Cargando…

Use of LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional axillary dissection in breast cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND: In locally advanced breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection remains a pivotal component of surgical therapy. Apart from this, it has been mostly replaced by sentinel node biopsy. Complications after axillary dissection include wound infection, neuropathy, lymphedema and—most freque...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wienerroither, V., Hammer, R., Kornprat, P., Schrem, H., Wagner, D., Mischinger, H. J., El-Shabrawi, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01888-2
_version_ 1784855192943984640
author Wienerroither, V.
Hammer, R.
Kornprat, P.
Schrem, H.
Wagner, D.
Mischinger, H. J.
El-Shabrawi, A.
author_facet Wienerroither, V.
Hammer, R.
Kornprat, P.
Schrem, H.
Wagner, D.
Mischinger, H. J.
El-Shabrawi, A.
author_sort Wienerroither, V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In locally advanced breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection remains a pivotal component of surgical therapy. Apart from this, it has been mostly replaced by sentinel node biopsy. Complications after axillary dissection include wound infection, neuropathy, lymphedema and—most frequently—seroma. In this retrospective multi-centre study, we compared the use of LigaSure(TM) with monopolar electrocautery regarding perioperative outcome. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis from female breast cancer patients who underwent axillary dissection at two breast centres in Austria that are using two different surgical techniques was performed for this study. We compared the rate of complications and re-operations, length of hospital stay, time to drain removal, total drain fluid, seroma formation after drain removal, number of seroma aspirations and total seroma fluid. RESULTS: Seventy one female patients with a median age of 63 (30–83) were included in this study. In 35 patients LigaSure(TM) and in 36 monopolar cautery was used for axillary dissection. There was no significant difference regarding intraoperative complications and rate of re-operations between the two groups (2.9 vs. 5.6%; p = 1 and 2.9 vs. 13.9%; p = 0.199). The time to drain removal and the length of hospital stay was similar in both groups. A significant difference in the occurence of postoperative wound infection could also not be shown. However, we found a significantly smaller total drain fluid in the LigaSure(TM)-group compared to the cautery-group (364.6 ml vs. 643.4 ml; p = 0.004). Seroma formation after drain removal was more frequent in the LigaSure(TM)-group (68.6 vs. 41.7%; p = 0.032) with a higher number of outpatient seroma aspirations (2.0 vs. 0.9; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: LigaSure(TM) and monopolar cautery provide equivalent techniques in axillary lymph node dissection with comparable postoperative outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9773442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97734422022-12-23 Use of LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional axillary dissection in breast cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study Wienerroither, V. Hammer, R. Kornprat, P. Schrem, H. Wagner, D. Mischinger, H. J. El-Shabrawi, A. BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: In locally advanced breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection remains a pivotal component of surgical therapy. Apart from this, it has been mostly replaced by sentinel node biopsy. Complications after axillary dissection include wound infection, neuropathy, lymphedema and—most frequently—seroma. In this retrospective multi-centre study, we compared the use of LigaSure(TM) with monopolar electrocautery regarding perioperative outcome. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis from female breast cancer patients who underwent axillary dissection at two breast centres in Austria that are using two different surgical techniques was performed for this study. We compared the rate of complications and re-operations, length of hospital stay, time to drain removal, total drain fluid, seroma formation after drain removal, number of seroma aspirations and total seroma fluid. RESULTS: Seventy one female patients with a median age of 63 (30–83) were included in this study. In 35 patients LigaSure(TM) and in 36 monopolar cautery was used for axillary dissection. There was no significant difference regarding intraoperative complications and rate of re-operations between the two groups (2.9 vs. 5.6%; p = 1 and 2.9 vs. 13.9%; p = 0.199). The time to drain removal and the length of hospital stay was similar in both groups. A significant difference in the occurence of postoperative wound infection could also not be shown. However, we found a significantly smaller total drain fluid in the LigaSure(TM)-group compared to the cautery-group (364.6 ml vs. 643.4 ml; p = 0.004). Seroma formation after drain removal was more frequent in the LigaSure(TM)-group (68.6 vs. 41.7%; p = 0.032) with a higher number of outpatient seroma aspirations (2.0 vs. 0.9; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: LigaSure(TM) and monopolar cautery provide equivalent techniques in axillary lymph node dissection with comparable postoperative outcomes. BioMed Central 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9773442/ /pubmed/36544128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01888-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wienerroither, V.
Hammer, R.
Kornprat, P.
Schrem, H.
Wagner, D.
Mischinger, H. J.
El-Shabrawi, A.
Use of LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional axillary dissection in breast cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study
title Use of LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional axillary dissection in breast cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study
title_full Use of LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional axillary dissection in breast cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study
title_fullStr Use of LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional axillary dissection in breast cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Use of LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional axillary dissection in breast cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study
title_short Use of LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional axillary dissection in breast cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study
title_sort use of ligasure vessel sealing system versus conventional axillary dissection in breast cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01888-2
work_keys_str_mv AT wienerroitherv useofligasurevesselsealingsystemversusconventionalaxillarydissectioninbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT hammerr useofligasurevesselsealingsystemversusconventionalaxillarydissectioninbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT kornpratp useofligasurevesselsealingsystemversusconventionalaxillarydissectioninbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT schremh useofligasurevesselsealingsystemversusconventionalaxillarydissectioninbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT wagnerd useofligasurevesselsealingsystemversusconventionalaxillarydissectioninbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT mischingerhj useofligasurevesselsealingsystemversusconventionalaxillarydissectioninbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT elshabrawia useofligasurevesselsealingsystemversusconventionalaxillarydissectioninbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectivecomparativestudy