Cargando…
Validation of a new emotion regulation self-report questionnaire for children
OBJECTIVE: To examine and validate the self-report Questionnaire on the Regulation of Unpleasant Moods in Children (FRUST), which is a modified and shortened version of the Questionnaire for the Assessment of Emotion Regulation in Children and Adolescents (FEEL-KJ). METHODS: The data comprised child...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04440-x |
_version_ | 1784855197077471232 |
---|---|
author | Junghänel, Michaela Wand, Hildegard Dose, Christina Thöne, Ann-Kathrin Treier, Anne-Katrin Hanisch, Charlotte Ritschel, Anne Kölch, Michael Lincke, Lena Roessner, Veit Kohls, Gregor Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike Kaman, Anne Banaschewski, Tobias Aggensteiner, Pascal-M. Görtz-Dorten, Anja Döpfner, Manfred |
author_facet | Junghänel, Michaela Wand, Hildegard Dose, Christina Thöne, Ann-Kathrin Treier, Anne-Katrin Hanisch, Charlotte Ritschel, Anne Kölch, Michael Lincke, Lena Roessner, Veit Kohls, Gregor Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike Kaman, Anne Banaschewski, Tobias Aggensteiner, Pascal-M. Görtz-Dorten, Anja Döpfner, Manfred |
author_sort | Junghänel, Michaela |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine and validate the self-report Questionnaire on the Regulation of Unpleasant Moods in Children (FRUST), which is a modified and shortened version of the Questionnaire for the Assessment of Emotion Regulation in Children and Adolescents (FEEL-KJ). METHODS: The data comprised child and parent ratings of a community-screened sample with differing levels of affective dysregulation (AD) (N = 391, age: M = 10.64, SD = 1.33, 56% male). We conducted latent factor analyses to establish a factor structure. Subsequently, we assessed measurement invariance (MI) regarding age, gender, and AD level and evaluated the internal consistencies of the scales. Finally, we examined the convergent and divergent validity of the instrument by calculating differential correlations between the emotion regulation strategy (ERS) scales and self- and parent-report measures of psychopathology. RESULTS: A four-factor model, with one factor representing Dysfunctional Strategies and the three factors Distraction, Problem-Solving and Social Support representing functional strategies provided the best fit to our data and was straightforward to interpret. We found strong MI for age and gender and weak MI for AD level. Differential correlations with child and parent ratings of measures of psychopathology supported the construct validity of the factors. CONCLUSIONS: We established a reliable and valid self-report measure for the assessment of ERS in children. Due to the reduced number of items and the inclusion of highly specific regulatory behaviors, the FRUST might be a valuable contribution to the assessment of ER strategies for diagnostic, therapeutic, and research purposes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04440-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9773459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97734592022-12-23 Validation of a new emotion regulation self-report questionnaire for children Junghänel, Michaela Wand, Hildegard Dose, Christina Thöne, Ann-Kathrin Treier, Anne-Katrin Hanisch, Charlotte Ritschel, Anne Kölch, Michael Lincke, Lena Roessner, Veit Kohls, Gregor Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike Kaman, Anne Banaschewski, Tobias Aggensteiner, Pascal-M. Görtz-Dorten, Anja Döpfner, Manfred BMC Psychiatry Research OBJECTIVE: To examine and validate the self-report Questionnaire on the Regulation of Unpleasant Moods in Children (FRUST), which is a modified and shortened version of the Questionnaire for the Assessment of Emotion Regulation in Children and Adolescents (FEEL-KJ). METHODS: The data comprised child and parent ratings of a community-screened sample with differing levels of affective dysregulation (AD) (N = 391, age: M = 10.64, SD = 1.33, 56% male). We conducted latent factor analyses to establish a factor structure. Subsequently, we assessed measurement invariance (MI) regarding age, gender, and AD level and evaluated the internal consistencies of the scales. Finally, we examined the convergent and divergent validity of the instrument by calculating differential correlations between the emotion regulation strategy (ERS) scales and self- and parent-report measures of psychopathology. RESULTS: A four-factor model, with one factor representing Dysfunctional Strategies and the three factors Distraction, Problem-Solving and Social Support representing functional strategies provided the best fit to our data and was straightforward to interpret. We found strong MI for age and gender and weak MI for AD level. Differential correlations with child and parent ratings of measures of psychopathology supported the construct validity of the factors. CONCLUSIONS: We established a reliable and valid self-report measure for the assessment of ERS in children. Due to the reduced number of items and the inclusion of highly specific regulatory behaviors, the FRUST might be a valuable contribution to the assessment of ER strategies for diagnostic, therapeutic, and research purposes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04440-x. BioMed Central 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9773459/ /pubmed/36550484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04440-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Junghänel, Michaela Wand, Hildegard Dose, Christina Thöne, Ann-Kathrin Treier, Anne-Katrin Hanisch, Charlotte Ritschel, Anne Kölch, Michael Lincke, Lena Roessner, Veit Kohls, Gregor Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike Kaman, Anne Banaschewski, Tobias Aggensteiner, Pascal-M. Görtz-Dorten, Anja Döpfner, Manfred Validation of a new emotion regulation self-report questionnaire for children |
title | Validation of a new emotion regulation self-report questionnaire for children |
title_full | Validation of a new emotion regulation self-report questionnaire for children |
title_fullStr | Validation of a new emotion regulation self-report questionnaire for children |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a new emotion regulation self-report questionnaire for children |
title_short | Validation of a new emotion regulation self-report questionnaire for children |
title_sort | validation of a new emotion regulation self-report questionnaire for children |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04440-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT junghanelmichaela validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT wandhildegard validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT dosechristina validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT thoneannkathrin validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT treierannekatrin validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT hanischcharlotte validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT ritschelanne validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT kolchmichael validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT linckelena validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT roessnerveit validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT kohlsgregor validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT ravenssiebererulrike validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT kamananne validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT banaschewskitobias validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT aggensteinerpascalm validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT gortzdortenanja validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT dopfnermanfred validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren AT validationofanewemotionregulationselfreportquestionnaireforchildren |