Cargando…
Intervention effect estimates in randomised controlled trials conducted in primary care versus secondary or tertiary care settings: a meta-epidemiological study
BACKGROUND: Many clinical practice guidelines are based on randomised controlled trials conducted in secondary or tertiary care setting and general practitioners frequently question their relevance for primary care patients. Our aim was to compare the intervention effect estimates between primary ca...
Autores principales: | Dugard, Amandine, Tavernier, Elsa, Caille, Agnès, Dechartres, Agnès, Hoang, Adeline, Giraudeau, Bruno, Dibao-Dina, Clarisse |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01815-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Heterogeneous perception of the ethical legitimacy of unbalanced randomization by institutional review board members: a clinical vignette-based survey
por: Dibao-Dina, Clarisse, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Intervention effect estimates in cluster randomized versus individually randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Leyrat, Clémence, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review
por: Charles, Pierre, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Mixing Nulliparous and Multiparous Women in Randomised Controlled Trials of Preeclampsia Prevention Is Debatable: Evidence from a Systematic Review
por: Simon, Emmanuel, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management
por: Giraudeau, Bruno, et al.
Publicado: (2022)