Cargando…

Malnutrition screening and treatment in pediatric oncology: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition and cachexia during pediatric cancer treatment worsen toxicity and quality-of-life. Clinical practice varies with lack of standard malnutrition definition and nutrition interventions. This scoping review highlights available malnutrition screening and intervention data in ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franke, Jessica, Bishop, Chris, Runco, Daniel V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40795-022-00643-3
_version_ 1784855222959472640
author Franke, Jessica
Bishop, Chris
Runco, Daniel V.
author_facet Franke, Jessica
Bishop, Chris
Runco, Daniel V.
author_sort Franke, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malnutrition and cachexia during pediatric cancer treatment worsen toxicity and quality-of-life. Clinical practice varies with lack of standard malnutrition definition and nutrition interventions. This scoping review highlights available malnutrition screening and intervention data in childhood cancer and the need for standardizing assessment and treatment. METHODS: Ovid Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies containing malnutrition as the primary outcome with anthropometric, radiographic, or biochemical measurements. Secondary outcomes included validated nutritional assessment or screening tools. Two authors reviewed full manuscripts for inclusion. Narrative analysis was chosen over statistical analysis due to study heterogeneity. RESULTS: The search yielded 234 articles and 17 articles identified from reference searching. Nine met inclusion criteria with six nutritional intervention studies (examining appetite stimulants, nutrition supplementation, and proactive feeding tubes) and three nutritional screening studies (algorithms or nutrition support teams) each with variable measures and outcomes. Both laboratory evaluations (albumin, prealbumin, total protein) and body measurement (weight loss, mid-upper arm circumference) were used. Studies demonstrated improved weight, without difference between formula or appetite stimulant used. Screening studies yielded mixed results on preventing weight loss, weight gain, and survival. CONCLUSION: Our review demonstrated a paucity of evidence for malnutrition screening and intervention in pediatric cancer treatment. While a variety of malnutrition outcomes, interventions, and screening tools exist, nutritional interventions increased weight and decreased complications. Screening tools decreased malnutrition risk and may improve weight gain. Potential age- and disease-specific nutritional benefits and toxicities also exist, further highlighting the benefit of standardizing malnutrition definitions, screening, and interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9773580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97735802022-12-23 Malnutrition screening and treatment in pediatric oncology: a scoping review Franke, Jessica Bishop, Chris Runco, Daniel V. BMC Nutr Research Article BACKGROUND: Malnutrition and cachexia during pediatric cancer treatment worsen toxicity and quality-of-life. Clinical practice varies with lack of standard malnutrition definition and nutrition interventions. This scoping review highlights available malnutrition screening and intervention data in childhood cancer and the need for standardizing assessment and treatment. METHODS: Ovid Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies containing malnutrition as the primary outcome with anthropometric, radiographic, or biochemical measurements. Secondary outcomes included validated nutritional assessment or screening tools. Two authors reviewed full manuscripts for inclusion. Narrative analysis was chosen over statistical analysis due to study heterogeneity. RESULTS: The search yielded 234 articles and 17 articles identified from reference searching. Nine met inclusion criteria with six nutritional intervention studies (examining appetite stimulants, nutrition supplementation, and proactive feeding tubes) and three nutritional screening studies (algorithms or nutrition support teams) each with variable measures and outcomes. Both laboratory evaluations (albumin, prealbumin, total protein) and body measurement (weight loss, mid-upper arm circumference) were used. Studies demonstrated improved weight, without difference between formula or appetite stimulant used. Screening studies yielded mixed results on preventing weight loss, weight gain, and survival. CONCLUSION: Our review demonstrated a paucity of evidence for malnutrition screening and intervention in pediatric cancer treatment. While a variety of malnutrition outcomes, interventions, and screening tools exist, nutritional interventions increased weight and decreased complications. Screening tools decreased malnutrition risk and may improve weight gain. Potential age- and disease-specific nutritional benefits and toxicities also exist, further highlighting the benefit of standardizing malnutrition definitions, screening, and interventions. BioMed Central 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9773580/ /pubmed/36550508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40795-022-00643-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Franke, Jessica
Bishop, Chris
Runco, Daniel V.
Malnutrition screening and treatment in pediatric oncology: a scoping review
title Malnutrition screening and treatment in pediatric oncology: a scoping review
title_full Malnutrition screening and treatment in pediatric oncology: a scoping review
title_fullStr Malnutrition screening and treatment in pediatric oncology: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Malnutrition screening and treatment in pediatric oncology: a scoping review
title_short Malnutrition screening and treatment in pediatric oncology: a scoping review
title_sort malnutrition screening and treatment in pediatric oncology: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40795-022-00643-3
work_keys_str_mv AT frankejessica malnutritionscreeningandtreatmentinpediatriconcologyascopingreview
AT bishopchris malnutritionscreeningandtreatmentinpediatriconcologyascopingreview
AT runcodanielv malnutritionscreeningandtreatmentinpediatriconcologyascopingreview