Cargando…

Pre‐operative risk factors for driveline infection in left ventricular‐assist device patients

AIMS: Implantation of left ventricular‐assist devices (LVAD) to treat end‐stage heart failure is of increasing relevance due to donor shortage. Infections of the driveline are common adverse events. LVAD infections can lead to high urgency listings for transplantation. However, transplantation in pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Köhler, Ann‐Kristin, Körperich, Hermann, Morshuis, Michiel, Freytag, Claudia Christine, Gummert, Jan, Burchert, Wolfgang, Preuss, Rainer, Körfer, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35997005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14112
_version_ 1784855235198451712
author Köhler, Ann‐Kristin
Körperich, Hermann
Morshuis, Michiel
Freytag, Claudia Christine
Gummert, Jan
Burchert, Wolfgang
Preuss, Rainer
Körfer, Jan
author_facet Köhler, Ann‐Kristin
Körperich, Hermann
Morshuis, Michiel
Freytag, Claudia Christine
Gummert, Jan
Burchert, Wolfgang
Preuss, Rainer
Körfer, Jan
author_sort Köhler, Ann‐Kristin
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Implantation of left ventricular‐assist devices (LVAD) to treat end‐stage heart failure is of increasing relevance due to donor shortage. Infections of the driveline are common adverse events. LVAD infections can lead to high urgency listings for transplantation. However, transplantation in patients with infection leads to worse post‐transplantation outcomes. This study aims to evaluate specific risk factors for driveline infections at the time of implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred forty‐one patients receiving either Heartmate II or Heartware system from August 2009 to October 2013 were assessed. An expert committee sorted patients into four different groups concerning the likeliness of infection. Twenty‐eight (6%) of discussed infection cases were judged as secured, 33 (7%) as likely, 18 (4%) as possible, and 20 (4%) as unlikely. The remaining 342 (78%) subjects showed either no signs of infection at all times (329 [75%]) or developed signs of infection in a second observation period within 1 year after ending of the first observation period (13 [3%]). For a better discriminatory power, cases of secured and likely infections were tested against the group with no infection at all times in a Cox proportional hazard model. Among all variables tested by univariate analysis (significance level P < 0.15), only age (P = 0.07), LVAD‐type (P = 0.12), need for another thoracic operation (P = 0.02), and serum creatinine value (P = 0.02) reached statistical significance. These were subsequently subjected to multivariate analysis to calculate the cumulative risk of developing a drive infection. The multivariate analysis showed that of all the potential risk factors tested, only the necessity of re‐thoracotomy or secondary thoracic closure had a significant, protective effect (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 0.45 [0.21–0.95]; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This single‐centre cohort study shows that driveline infections are common adverse events. The duration of support represents the major risk factor for LVAD driveline infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9773640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97736402022-12-23 Pre‐operative risk factors for driveline infection in left ventricular‐assist device patients Köhler, Ann‐Kristin Körperich, Hermann Morshuis, Michiel Freytag, Claudia Christine Gummert, Jan Burchert, Wolfgang Preuss, Rainer Körfer, Jan ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: Implantation of left ventricular‐assist devices (LVAD) to treat end‐stage heart failure is of increasing relevance due to donor shortage. Infections of the driveline are common adverse events. LVAD infections can lead to high urgency listings for transplantation. However, transplantation in patients with infection leads to worse post‐transplantation outcomes. This study aims to evaluate specific risk factors for driveline infections at the time of implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred forty‐one patients receiving either Heartmate II or Heartware system from August 2009 to October 2013 were assessed. An expert committee sorted patients into four different groups concerning the likeliness of infection. Twenty‐eight (6%) of discussed infection cases were judged as secured, 33 (7%) as likely, 18 (4%) as possible, and 20 (4%) as unlikely. The remaining 342 (78%) subjects showed either no signs of infection at all times (329 [75%]) or developed signs of infection in a second observation period within 1 year after ending of the first observation period (13 [3%]). For a better discriminatory power, cases of secured and likely infections were tested against the group with no infection at all times in a Cox proportional hazard model. Among all variables tested by univariate analysis (significance level P < 0.15), only age (P = 0.07), LVAD‐type (P = 0.12), need for another thoracic operation (P = 0.02), and serum creatinine value (P = 0.02) reached statistical significance. These were subsequently subjected to multivariate analysis to calculate the cumulative risk of developing a drive infection. The multivariate analysis showed that of all the potential risk factors tested, only the necessity of re‐thoracotomy or secondary thoracic closure had a significant, protective effect (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 0.45 [0.21–0.95]; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This single‐centre cohort study shows that driveline infections are common adverse events. The duration of support represents the major risk factor for LVAD driveline infections. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9773640/ /pubmed/35997005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14112 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Köhler, Ann‐Kristin
Körperich, Hermann
Morshuis, Michiel
Freytag, Claudia Christine
Gummert, Jan
Burchert, Wolfgang
Preuss, Rainer
Körfer, Jan
Pre‐operative risk factors for driveline infection in left ventricular‐assist device patients
title Pre‐operative risk factors for driveline infection in left ventricular‐assist device patients
title_full Pre‐operative risk factors for driveline infection in left ventricular‐assist device patients
title_fullStr Pre‐operative risk factors for driveline infection in left ventricular‐assist device patients
title_full_unstemmed Pre‐operative risk factors for driveline infection in left ventricular‐assist device patients
title_short Pre‐operative risk factors for driveline infection in left ventricular‐assist device patients
title_sort pre‐operative risk factors for driveline infection in left ventricular‐assist device patients
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35997005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14112
work_keys_str_mv AT kohlerannkristin preoperativeriskfactorsfordrivelineinfectioninleftventricularassistdevicepatients
AT korperichhermann preoperativeriskfactorsfordrivelineinfectioninleftventricularassistdevicepatients
AT morshuismichiel preoperativeriskfactorsfordrivelineinfectioninleftventricularassistdevicepatients
AT freytagclaudiachristine preoperativeriskfactorsfordrivelineinfectioninleftventricularassistdevicepatients
AT gummertjan preoperativeriskfactorsfordrivelineinfectioninleftventricularassistdevicepatients
AT burchertwolfgang preoperativeriskfactorsfordrivelineinfectioninleftventricularassistdevicepatients
AT preussrainer preoperativeriskfactorsfordrivelineinfectioninleftventricularassistdevicepatients
AT korferjan preoperativeriskfactorsfordrivelineinfectioninleftventricularassistdevicepatients