Cargando…

Invisible cervical cancers on MRI: Can the type of histology (SCC versus non-SCC) influence surgical planning?

BACKGROUND: Invisible cervical cancers on MRI can indicate less invasive surgery. Cervical cancers consist of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and non-SCC, each with different long-term outcomes. It is still unclear if surgical planning should be changed according to the histologic type of cervical can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeon, Jungeun, Park, Byung Kwan, Lee, Jeong-Won, Choi, Chel Hun, Lee, Yoo-Young, Kim, Tae-Joong, Kim, Byoungi-Gie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568188
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.996516
_version_ 1784855276654952448
author Jeon, Jungeun
Park, Byung Kwan
Lee, Jeong-Won
Choi, Chel Hun
Lee, Yoo-Young
Kim, Tae-Joong
Kim, Byoungi-Gie
author_facet Jeon, Jungeun
Park, Byung Kwan
Lee, Jeong-Won
Choi, Chel Hun
Lee, Yoo-Young
Kim, Tae-Joong
Kim, Byoungi-Gie
author_sort Jeon, Jungeun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Invisible cervical cancers on MRI can indicate less invasive surgery. Cervical cancers consist of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and non-SCC, each with different long-term outcomes. It is still unclear if surgical planning should be changed according to the histologic type of cervical cancer when it is not visible on MRI. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine if surgical planning for cervical cancer that is not visible on MRI is influenced by the histologic type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2016, 155 women had Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 1B1 cervical cancer that was not visible on preoperative MRI. They underwent radical hysterectomies and pelvic lymph node dissections. Among them, 88 and 67 were histologically diagnosed with SCC and non-SCC, respectively. The size of the residual tumor, depth of stromal invasion, parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis were compared between these patients using the t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, Chi-squared test, or Fisher’s exact test. The recurrence-free and overall 10-year survival rates were compared between the groups by Kaplan–Meier analysis. RESULTS: The mean sizes of residual tumors were 8.4 ± 10.4 mm in the SCC group and 12.5 ± 11.9 mm in the non-SCC group (p = 0.024). The mean depth of stromal invasion in the SCC group was 12.4 ± 21.2% (0%–100%), whereas that in the non-SCC group was 22.4 ± 24.4 (0%–93%) (p = 0.016). However, there was no difference in parametrial or vaginal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, or lymph node metastasis (p = 0.504–1.000). The recurrence-free and overall 10-year survival rates were 98.9% (87/88) and 95.5% (64/67) (p = 0.246), and 96.6% (85/88) and 95.5% (64/67) (p = 0.872), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The non-SCC group tends to have larger residual tumors and a greater depth of stromal invasion than the SCC group, even though neither is visible on MRI. Therefore, meticulous care is necessary for performing parametrectomy in patients with non-SCC cervical cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9773832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97738322022-12-23 Invisible cervical cancers on MRI: Can the type of histology (SCC versus non-SCC) influence surgical planning? Jeon, Jungeun Park, Byung Kwan Lee, Jeong-Won Choi, Chel Hun Lee, Yoo-Young Kim, Tae-Joong Kim, Byoungi-Gie Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Invisible cervical cancers on MRI can indicate less invasive surgery. Cervical cancers consist of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and non-SCC, each with different long-term outcomes. It is still unclear if surgical planning should be changed according to the histologic type of cervical cancer when it is not visible on MRI. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine if surgical planning for cervical cancer that is not visible on MRI is influenced by the histologic type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2016, 155 women had Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 1B1 cervical cancer that was not visible on preoperative MRI. They underwent radical hysterectomies and pelvic lymph node dissections. Among them, 88 and 67 were histologically diagnosed with SCC and non-SCC, respectively. The size of the residual tumor, depth of stromal invasion, parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis were compared between these patients using the t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, Chi-squared test, or Fisher’s exact test. The recurrence-free and overall 10-year survival rates were compared between the groups by Kaplan–Meier analysis. RESULTS: The mean sizes of residual tumors were 8.4 ± 10.4 mm in the SCC group and 12.5 ± 11.9 mm in the non-SCC group (p = 0.024). The mean depth of stromal invasion in the SCC group was 12.4 ± 21.2% (0%–100%), whereas that in the non-SCC group was 22.4 ± 24.4 (0%–93%) (p = 0.016). However, there was no difference in parametrial or vaginal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, or lymph node metastasis (p = 0.504–1.000). The recurrence-free and overall 10-year survival rates were 98.9% (87/88) and 95.5% (64/67) (p = 0.246), and 96.6% (85/88) and 95.5% (64/67) (p = 0.872), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The non-SCC group tends to have larger residual tumors and a greater depth of stromal invasion than the SCC group, even though neither is visible on MRI. Therefore, meticulous care is necessary for performing parametrectomy in patients with non-SCC cervical cancer. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9773832/ /pubmed/36568188 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.996516 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jeon, Park, Lee, Choi, Lee, Kim and Kim https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Jeon, Jungeun
Park, Byung Kwan
Lee, Jeong-Won
Choi, Chel Hun
Lee, Yoo-Young
Kim, Tae-Joong
Kim, Byoungi-Gie
Invisible cervical cancers on MRI: Can the type of histology (SCC versus non-SCC) influence surgical planning?
title Invisible cervical cancers on MRI: Can the type of histology (SCC versus non-SCC) influence surgical planning?
title_full Invisible cervical cancers on MRI: Can the type of histology (SCC versus non-SCC) influence surgical planning?
title_fullStr Invisible cervical cancers on MRI: Can the type of histology (SCC versus non-SCC) influence surgical planning?
title_full_unstemmed Invisible cervical cancers on MRI: Can the type of histology (SCC versus non-SCC) influence surgical planning?
title_short Invisible cervical cancers on MRI: Can the type of histology (SCC versus non-SCC) influence surgical planning?
title_sort invisible cervical cancers on mri: can the type of histology (scc versus non-scc) influence surgical planning?
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568188
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.996516
work_keys_str_mv AT jeonjungeun invisiblecervicalcancersonmricanthetypeofhistologysccversusnonsccinfluencesurgicalplanning
AT parkbyungkwan invisiblecervicalcancersonmricanthetypeofhistologysccversusnonsccinfluencesurgicalplanning
AT leejeongwon invisiblecervicalcancersonmricanthetypeofhistologysccversusnonsccinfluencesurgicalplanning
AT choichelhun invisiblecervicalcancersonmricanthetypeofhistologysccversusnonsccinfluencesurgicalplanning
AT leeyooyoung invisiblecervicalcancersonmricanthetypeofhistologysccversusnonsccinfluencesurgicalplanning
AT kimtaejoong invisiblecervicalcancersonmricanthetypeofhistologysccversusnonsccinfluencesurgicalplanning
AT kimbyoungigie invisiblecervicalcancersonmricanthetypeofhistologysccversusnonsccinfluencesurgicalplanning