Cargando…
Diagnosis and Antifungal Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis
The COVID-19 pandemic has redemonstrated the importance of the fungal-after-viral phenomenon, and the question of whether prophylaxis should be used to prevent COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). A distinct pathophysiology from invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), CAPA has an inci...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9774425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36551361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121704 |
_version_ | 1784855404773113856 |
---|---|
author | Hawes, Armani M. Permpalung, Nitipong |
author_facet | Hawes, Armani M. Permpalung, Nitipong |
author_sort | Hawes, Armani M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic has redemonstrated the importance of the fungal-after-viral phenomenon, and the question of whether prophylaxis should be used to prevent COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). A distinct pathophysiology from invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), CAPA has an incidence that ranges from 5% to 30%, with significant mortality. The aim of this work was to describe the current diagnostic landscape of CAPA and review the existing literature on antifungal prophylaxis. A variety of definitions for CAPA have been described in the literature and the performance of the diagnostic tests for CAPA is limited, making diagnosis a challenge. There are only six studies that have investigated antifungal prophylaxis for CAPA. The two studied drugs have been posaconazole, either a liquid formulation via an oral gastric tube or an intravenous formulation, and inhaled amphotericin. While some studies have revealed promising results, they are limited by small sample sizes and bias inherent to retrospective studies. Additionally, as the COVID-19 pandemic changes and we see fewer intubated and critically ill patients, it will be more important to recognize these fungal-after-viral complications among non-critically ill, immunocompromised patients. Randomized controlled trials are needed to better understand the role of antifungal prophylaxis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9774425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97744252022-12-23 Diagnosis and Antifungal Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis Hawes, Armani M. Permpalung, Nitipong Antibiotics (Basel) Review The COVID-19 pandemic has redemonstrated the importance of the fungal-after-viral phenomenon, and the question of whether prophylaxis should be used to prevent COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). A distinct pathophysiology from invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), CAPA has an incidence that ranges from 5% to 30%, with significant mortality. The aim of this work was to describe the current diagnostic landscape of CAPA and review the existing literature on antifungal prophylaxis. A variety of definitions for CAPA have been described in the literature and the performance of the diagnostic tests for CAPA is limited, making diagnosis a challenge. There are only six studies that have investigated antifungal prophylaxis for CAPA. The two studied drugs have been posaconazole, either a liquid formulation via an oral gastric tube or an intravenous formulation, and inhaled amphotericin. While some studies have revealed promising results, they are limited by small sample sizes and bias inherent to retrospective studies. Additionally, as the COVID-19 pandemic changes and we see fewer intubated and critically ill patients, it will be more important to recognize these fungal-after-viral complications among non-critically ill, immunocompromised patients. Randomized controlled trials are needed to better understand the role of antifungal prophylaxis. MDPI 2022-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9774425/ /pubmed/36551361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121704 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Hawes, Armani M. Permpalung, Nitipong Diagnosis and Antifungal Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis |
title | Diagnosis and Antifungal Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis |
title_full | Diagnosis and Antifungal Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis |
title_fullStr | Diagnosis and Antifungal Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosis and Antifungal Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis |
title_short | Diagnosis and Antifungal Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis |
title_sort | diagnosis and antifungal prophylaxis for covid-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9774425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36551361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121704 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hawesarmanim diagnosisandantifungalprophylaxisforcovid19associatedpulmonaryaspergillosis AT permpalungnitipong diagnosisandantifungalprophylaxisforcovid19associatedpulmonaryaspergillosis |