Cargando…

Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire—Short: Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the Italian Version

Objective: The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) is a widely used instrument to assess cognitive emotion regulation strategies. The study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the Italian short version of the CERQ (CERQ-IS). Methods: Two separate samples of 442 young adults (M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cerolini, Silvia, Zagaria, Andrea, Vacca, Mariacarolina, Spinhoven, Philip, Violani, Cristiano, Lombardo, Caterina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9774580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36546957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs12120474
_version_ 1784855444007682048
author Cerolini, Silvia
Zagaria, Andrea
Vacca, Mariacarolina
Spinhoven, Philip
Violani, Cristiano
Lombardo, Caterina
author_facet Cerolini, Silvia
Zagaria, Andrea
Vacca, Mariacarolina
Spinhoven, Philip
Violani, Cristiano
Lombardo, Caterina
author_sort Cerolini, Silvia
collection PubMed
description Objective: The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) is a widely used instrument to assess cognitive emotion regulation strategies. The study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the Italian short version of the CERQ (CERQ-IS). Methods: Two separate samples of 442 young adults (M(age) = 21.12; SD = 3.69) and 256 adolescents (M(age) = 14.81; SD = 0.59) completed the CERQ, the Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) and the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to evaluate the dimensionality of the CERQ-IS. Internal consistency was analysed by calculating model-based composite reliability coefficients. Criterion and discriminant validity were gathered through the correlations with the ERQ and the MPS, respectively. Factorial invariances tests across gender and age were computed by means of multiple-group CFA. Results: CFA confirmed the nine-factor structure showing an excellent fit to the data. Except for rumination which was minimally acceptable, all subscales had an acceptable to good reliability. Criterion validity was supported by significant correlations between CERQ-IS and ERQ subscales. Discriminant validity was confirmed by meaningless correlations with the MPS facets. Configural, metric and scalar invariance were established across both grouping variables. Conclusions: The brevity of this tool and its good psychometric properties suggest that CERQ-IS could be a useful screening tool in both clinical and research practice in adolescence and young adulthood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9774580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97745802022-12-23 Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire—Short: Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the Italian Version Cerolini, Silvia Zagaria, Andrea Vacca, Mariacarolina Spinhoven, Philip Violani, Cristiano Lombardo, Caterina Behav Sci (Basel) Article Objective: The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) is a widely used instrument to assess cognitive emotion regulation strategies. The study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the Italian short version of the CERQ (CERQ-IS). Methods: Two separate samples of 442 young adults (M(age) = 21.12; SD = 3.69) and 256 adolescents (M(age) = 14.81; SD = 0.59) completed the CERQ, the Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) and the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to evaluate the dimensionality of the CERQ-IS. Internal consistency was analysed by calculating model-based composite reliability coefficients. Criterion and discriminant validity were gathered through the correlations with the ERQ and the MPS, respectively. Factorial invariances tests across gender and age were computed by means of multiple-group CFA. Results: CFA confirmed the nine-factor structure showing an excellent fit to the data. Except for rumination which was minimally acceptable, all subscales had an acceptable to good reliability. Criterion validity was supported by significant correlations between CERQ-IS and ERQ subscales. Discriminant validity was confirmed by meaningless correlations with the MPS facets. Configural, metric and scalar invariance were established across both grouping variables. Conclusions: The brevity of this tool and its good psychometric properties suggest that CERQ-IS could be a useful screening tool in both clinical and research practice in adolescence and young adulthood. MDPI 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9774580/ /pubmed/36546957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs12120474 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cerolini, Silvia
Zagaria, Andrea
Vacca, Mariacarolina
Spinhoven, Philip
Violani, Cristiano
Lombardo, Caterina
Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire—Short: Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the Italian Version
title Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire—Short: Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the Italian Version
title_full Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire—Short: Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the Italian Version
title_fullStr Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire—Short: Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the Italian Version
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire—Short: Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the Italian Version
title_short Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire—Short: Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the Italian Version
title_sort cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire—short: reliability, validity, and measurement invariance of the italian version
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9774580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36546957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs12120474
work_keys_str_mv AT cerolinisilvia cognitiveemotionregulationquestionnaireshortreliabilityvalidityandmeasurementinvarianceoftheitalianversion
AT zagariaandrea cognitiveemotionregulationquestionnaireshortreliabilityvalidityandmeasurementinvarianceoftheitalianversion
AT vaccamariacarolina cognitiveemotionregulationquestionnaireshortreliabilityvalidityandmeasurementinvarianceoftheitalianversion
AT spinhovenphilip cognitiveemotionregulationquestionnaireshortreliabilityvalidityandmeasurementinvarianceoftheitalianversion
AT violanicristiano cognitiveemotionregulationquestionnaireshortreliabilityvalidityandmeasurementinvarianceoftheitalianversion
AT lombardocaterina cognitiveemotionregulationquestionnaireshortreliabilityvalidityandmeasurementinvarianceoftheitalianversion