Cargando…

Dimensions, Measures, and Contexts in Psychological Investigations of Curiosity: A Scoping Review

The study of curiosity as a construct has led to many conceptualisations, comprising of different dimensions. Due to this, various scales of curiosity have also been developed. Moreover, some researchers have conceived of curiosity as a general trait-like, while others have included contexts, such a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yow, Yong Jie, Ramsay, Jonathan E., Lin, Patrick K. F., Marsh, Nigel V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9774665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36546976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs12120493
_version_ 1784855465152217088
author Yow, Yong Jie
Ramsay, Jonathan E.
Lin, Patrick K. F.
Marsh, Nigel V.
author_facet Yow, Yong Jie
Ramsay, Jonathan E.
Lin, Patrick K. F.
Marsh, Nigel V.
author_sort Yow, Yong Jie
collection PubMed
description The study of curiosity as a construct has led to many conceptualisations, comprising of different dimensions. Due to this, various scales of curiosity have also been developed. Moreover, some researchers have conceived of curiosity as a general trait-like, while others have included contexts, such as the workplace, or education when investigating curiosity. This scoping review aims to scope the extant psychological literature on curiosity in order to better understand how it has been studied, specifically with regard to its dimensions, measures, and contexts. A total of 1194 records were identified, with 245 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Results suggest that the majority of curiosity research examined curiosity as having multiple dimensions and analysed the dimensions individually, with a deprivation-type curiosity playing the biggest role. The measure most commonly used was the Epistemic Curiosity Scale, which also consisted of a deprivation-type curiosity as one of the dimensions. Findings also implied that curiosity was most studied in the context of the workplace. Supplementary findings included a lack of representation of non-Western countries, as well as needing to cross-validate a recently developed curiosity scale. This scoping review represents a consolidation of the curiosity literature and how it can further prosper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9774665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97746652022-12-23 Dimensions, Measures, and Contexts in Psychological Investigations of Curiosity: A Scoping Review Yow, Yong Jie Ramsay, Jonathan E. Lin, Patrick K. F. Marsh, Nigel V. Behav Sci (Basel) Review The study of curiosity as a construct has led to many conceptualisations, comprising of different dimensions. Due to this, various scales of curiosity have also been developed. Moreover, some researchers have conceived of curiosity as a general trait-like, while others have included contexts, such as the workplace, or education when investigating curiosity. This scoping review aims to scope the extant psychological literature on curiosity in order to better understand how it has been studied, specifically with regard to its dimensions, measures, and contexts. A total of 1194 records were identified, with 245 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Results suggest that the majority of curiosity research examined curiosity as having multiple dimensions and analysed the dimensions individually, with a deprivation-type curiosity playing the biggest role. The measure most commonly used was the Epistemic Curiosity Scale, which also consisted of a deprivation-type curiosity as one of the dimensions. Findings also implied that curiosity was most studied in the context of the workplace. Supplementary findings included a lack of representation of non-Western countries, as well as needing to cross-validate a recently developed curiosity scale. This scoping review represents a consolidation of the curiosity literature and how it can further prosper. MDPI 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9774665/ /pubmed/36546976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs12120493 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Yow, Yong Jie
Ramsay, Jonathan E.
Lin, Patrick K. F.
Marsh, Nigel V.
Dimensions, Measures, and Contexts in Psychological Investigations of Curiosity: A Scoping Review
title Dimensions, Measures, and Contexts in Psychological Investigations of Curiosity: A Scoping Review
title_full Dimensions, Measures, and Contexts in Psychological Investigations of Curiosity: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Dimensions, Measures, and Contexts in Psychological Investigations of Curiosity: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Dimensions, Measures, and Contexts in Psychological Investigations of Curiosity: A Scoping Review
title_short Dimensions, Measures, and Contexts in Psychological Investigations of Curiosity: A Scoping Review
title_sort dimensions, measures, and contexts in psychological investigations of curiosity: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9774665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36546976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs12120493
work_keys_str_mv AT yowyongjie dimensionsmeasuresandcontextsinpsychologicalinvestigationsofcuriosityascopingreview
AT ramsayjonathane dimensionsmeasuresandcontextsinpsychologicalinvestigationsofcuriosityascopingreview
AT linpatrickkf dimensionsmeasuresandcontextsinpsychologicalinvestigationsofcuriosityascopingreview
AT marshnigelv dimensionsmeasuresandcontextsinpsychologicalinvestigationsofcuriosityascopingreview