Cargando…

The Impact of PEGylation on Cellular Uptake and In Vivo Biodistribution of Gold Nanoparticle MRI Contrast Agents

Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have immense potential in biomedicine, but understanding their interactions with serum proteins is crucial as it could change their biological profile due to the formation of a protein corona, which could then affect their ultimate biodistribution in the body. Grafting GNPs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Baz, Nagwa, Nunn, Betty M., Bates, Paula J., O’Toole, Martin G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9774698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550972
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120766
_version_ 1784855471772925952
author El-Baz, Nagwa
Nunn, Betty M.
Bates, Paula J.
O’Toole, Martin G.
author_facet El-Baz, Nagwa
Nunn, Betty M.
Bates, Paula J.
O’Toole, Martin G.
author_sort El-Baz, Nagwa
collection PubMed
description Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have immense potential in biomedicine, but understanding their interactions with serum proteins is crucial as it could change their biological profile due to the formation of a protein corona, which could then affect their ultimate biodistribution in the body. Grafting GNPs with polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a widely used practice in research in order to decrease opsonization of the particles by serum proteins and to decrease particle uptake by the mononuclear phagocyte system. We investigated the impact of PEGylation on the formation of protein coronae and the subsequent uptake by macrophages and MDA-MB-231 cancer cells. Furthermore, we investigated the in vivo biodistribution in xenograft tumor-bearing mice using a library of 4 and 10 nm GNPs conjugated with a gadolinium chelate as MRI contrast agent, cancer-targeting aptamer AS1411 (or CRO control oligonucleotide), and with or without PEG molecules of different molecular weight (Mw: 1, 2, and 5 kDa). In vitro results showed that PEG failed to decrease the adsorption of proteins; moreover, the cellular uptake by macrophage cells was contingent on the different configurations of the aptamers and the length of the PEG chain. In vivo biodistribution studies showed that PEG increased the uptake by tumor cells for some GNPs, albeit it did not decrease the uptake of GNPs by macrophage-rich organs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9774698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97746982022-12-23 The Impact of PEGylation on Cellular Uptake and In Vivo Biodistribution of Gold Nanoparticle MRI Contrast Agents El-Baz, Nagwa Nunn, Betty M. Bates, Paula J. O’Toole, Martin G. Bioengineering (Basel) Article Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have immense potential in biomedicine, but understanding their interactions with serum proteins is crucial as it could change their biological profile due to the formation of a protein corona, which could then affect their ultimate biodistribution in the body. Grafting GNPs with polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a widely used practice in research in order to decrease opsonization of the particles by serum proteins and to decrease particle uptake by the mononuclear phagocyte system. We investigated the impact of PEGylation on the formation of protein coronae and the subsequent uptake by macrophages and MDA-MB-231 cancer cells. Furthermore, we investigated the in vivo biodistribution in xenograft tumor-bearing mice using a library of 4 and 10 nm GNPs conjugated with a gadolinium chelate as MRI contrast agent, cancer-targeting aptamer AS1411 (or CRO control oligonucleotide), and with or without PEG molecules of different molecular weight (Mw: 1, 2, and 5 kDa). In vitro results showed that PEG failed to decrease the adsorption of proteins; moreover, the cellular uptake by macrophage cells was contingent on the different configurations of the aptamers and the length of the PEG chain. In vivo biodistribution studies showed that PEG increased the uptake by tumor cells for some GNPs, albeit it did not decrease the uptake of GNPs by macrophage-rich organs. MDPI 2022-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9774698/ /pubmed/36550972 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120766 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
El-Baz, Nagwa
Nunn, Betty M.
Bates, Paula J.
O’Toole, Martin G.
The Impact of PEGylation on Cellular Uptake and In Vivo Biodistribution of Gold Nanoparticle MRI Contrast Agents
title The Impact of PEGylation on Cellular Uptake and In Vivo Biodistribution of Gold Nanoparticle MRI Contrast Agents
title_full The Impact of PEGylation on Cellular Uptake and In Vivo Biodistribution of Gold Nanoparticle MRI Contrast Agents
title_fullStr The Impact of PEGylation on Cellular Uptake and In Vivo Biodistribution of Gold Nanoparticle MRI Contrast Agents
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of PEGylation on Cellular Uptake and In Vivo Biodistribution of Gold Nanoparticle MRI Contrast Agents
title_short The Impact of PEGylation on Cellular Uptake and In Vivo Biodistribution of Gold Nanoparticle MRI Contrast Agents
title_sort impact of pegylation on cellular uptake and in vivo biodistribution of gold nanoparticle mri contrast agents
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9774698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550972
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120766
work_keys_str_mv AT elbaznagwa theimpactofpegylationoncellularuptakeandinvivobiodistributionofgoldnanoparticlemricontrastagents
AT nunnbettym theimpactofpegylationoncellularuptakeandinvivobiodistributionofgoldnanoparticlemricontrastagents
AT batespaulaj theimpactofpegylationoncellularuptakeandinvivobiodistributionofgoldnanoparticlemricontrastagents
AT otoolemarting theimpactofpegylationoncellularuptakeandinvivobiodistributionofgoldnanoparticlemricontrastagents
AT elbaznagwa impactofpegylationoncellularuptakeandinvivobiodistributionofgoldnanoparticlemricontrastagents
AT nunnbettym impactofpegylationoncellularuptakeandinvivobiodistributionofgoldnanoparticlemricontrastagents
AT batespaulaj impactofpegylationoncellularuptakeandinvivobiodistributionofgoldnanoparticlemricontrastagents
AT otoolemarting impactofpegylationoncellularuptakeandinvivobiodistributionofgoldnanoparticlemricontrastagents