Cargando…

The Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser-Activated Shock Wave-Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming Compared to Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Needle Irrigation in the Removal of Bioceramic Filling Remnants from Oval Root Canals—An Ex Vivo Study

The removal of filling material is important for successful root canal retreatment. The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of two activated irrigation techniques, the shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) mode of the Er:YAG laser and ultrasonically activated irrig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kapetanović Petričević, Gabrijela, Katić, Marko, Brzović Rajić, Valentina, Anić, Ivica, Bago, Ivona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9774814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36551026
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120820
_version_ 1784855500771295232
author Kapetanović Petričević, Gabrijela
Katić, Marko
Brzović Rajić, Valentina
Anić, Ivica
Bago, Ivona
author_facet Kapetanović Petričević, Gabrijela
Katić, Marko
Brzović Rajić, Valentina
Anić, Ivica
Bago, Ivona
author_sort Kapetanović Petričević, Gabrijela
collection PubMed
description The removal of filling material is important for successful root canal retreatment. The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of two activated irrigation techniques, the shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) mode of the Er:YAG laser and ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI) and a conventional syringe-needle technique (SNI), in the removal of bioceramic sealer/gutta-percha during conventional retreatment in oval root canals. The study sample consisted of distal root canals of 42 extracted human mandibular molars, which were prepared using a ProTaper Next system up to size 40/0.06 and filled with bioceramic sealer using a single-cone obturation technique. The teeth were then re-treated with a Reciproc Blue RB40 file and 3% sodium hypochlorite solution. The prepared teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n = 14 per group) and subjected to one of the three irrigation methods. Micro-CT scans were performed at different stages to assess the amount of filling material after each retreatment phase. The results of the study showed that all the tested irrigation techniques reduced a statistically significant amount of the remnant filling material at retreatment (p < 0.05), and there were no statistically significant differences in efficacy between the three methods. All tested techniques had similar efficacy in the removal of the remaining filling remnants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9774814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97748142022-12-23 The Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser-Activated Shock Wave-Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming Compared to Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Needle Irrigation in the Removal of Bioceramic Filling Remnants from Oval Root Canals—An Ex Vivo Study Kapetanović Petričević, Gabrijela Katić, Marko Brzović Rajić, Valentina Anić, Ivica Bago, Ivona Bioengineering (Basel) Article The removal of filling material is important for successful root canal retreatment. The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of two activated irrigation techniques, the shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) mode of the Er:YAG laser and ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI) and a conventional syringe-needle technique (SNI), in the removal of bioceramic sealer/gutta-percha during conventional retreatment in oval root canals. The study sample consisted of distal root canals of 42 extracted human mandibular molars, which were prepared using a ProTaper Next system up to size 40/0.06 and filled with bioceramic sealer using a single-cone obturation technique. The teeth were then re-treated with a Reciproc Blue RB40 file and 3% sodium hypochlorite solution. The prepared teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n = 14 per group) and subjected to one of the three irrigation methods. Micro-CT scans were performed at different stages to assess the amount of filling material after each retreatment phase. The results of the study showed that all the tested irrigation techniques reduced a statistically significant amount of the remnant filling material at retreatment (p < 0.05), and there were no statistically significant differences in efficacy between the three methods. All tested techniques had similar efficacy in the removal of the remaining filling remnants. MDPI 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9774814/ /pubmed/36551026 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120820 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kapetanović Petričević, Gabrijela
Katić, Marko
Brzović Rajić, Valentina
Anić, Ivica
Bago, Ivona
The Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser-Activated Shock Wave-Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming Compared to Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Needle Irrigation in the Removal of Bioceramic Filling Remnants from Oval Root Canals—An Ex Vivo Study
title The Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser-Activated Shock Wave-Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming Compared to Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Needle Irrigation in the Removal of Bioceramic Filling Remnants from Oval Root Canals—An Ex Vivo Study
title_full The Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser-Activated Shock Wave-Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming Compared to Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Needle Irrigation in the Removal of Bioceramic Filling Remnants from Oval Root Canals—An Ex Vivo Study
title_fullStr The Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser-Activated Shock Wave-Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming Compared to Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Needle Irrigation in the Removal of Bioceramic Filling Remnants from Oval Root Canals—An Ex Vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser-Activated Shock Wave-Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming Compared to Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Needle Irrigation in the Removal of Bioceramic Filling Remnants from Oval Root Canals—An Ex Vivo Study
title_short The Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser-Activated Shock Wave-Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming Compared to Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Needle Irrigation in the Removal of Bioceramic Filling Remnants from Oval Root Canals—An Ex Vivo Study
title_sort efficacy of er:yag laser-activated shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming compared to ultrasonically activated irrigation and needle irrigation in the removal of bioceramic filling remnants from oval root canals—an ex vivo study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9774814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36551026
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120820
work_keys_str_mv AT kapetanovicpetricevicgabrijela theefficacyoferyaglaseractivatedshockwaveenhancedemissionphotoacousticstreamingcomparedtoultrasonicallyactivatedirrigationandneedleirrigationintheremovalofbioceramicfillingremnantsfromovalrootcanalsanexvivostudy
AT katicmarko theefficacyoferyaglaseractivatedshockwaveenhancedemissionphotoacousticstreamingcomparedtoultrasonicallyactivatedirrigationandneedleirrigationintheremovalofbioceramicfillingremnantsfromovalrootcanalsanexvivostudy
AT brzovicrajicvalentina theefficacyoferyaglaseractivatedshockwaveenhancedemissionphotoacousticstreamingcomparedtoultrasonicallyactivatedirrigationandneedleirrigationintheremovalofbioceramicfillingremnantsfromovalrootcanalsanexvivostudy
AT anicivica theefficacyoferyaglaseractivatedshockwaveenhancedemissionphotoacousticstreamingcomparedtoultrasonicallyactivatedirrigationandneedleirrigationintheremovalofbioceramicfillingremnantsfromovalrootcanalsanexvivostudy
AT bagoivona theefficacyoferyaglaseractivatedshockwaveenhancedemissionphotoacousticstreamingcomparedtoultrasonicallyactivatedirrigationandneedleirrigationintheremovalofbioceramicfillingremnantsfromovalrootcanalsanexvivostudy
AT kapetanovicpetricevicgabrijela efficacyoferyaglaseractivatedshockwaveenhancedemissionphotoacousticstreamingcomparedtoultrasonicallyactivatedirrigationandneedleirrigationintheremovalofbioceramicfillingremnantsfromovalrootcanalsanexvivostudy
AT katicmarko efficacyoferyaglaseractivatedshockwaveenhancedemissionphotoacousticstreamingcomparedtoultrasonicallyactivatedirrigationandneedleirrigationintheremovalofbioceramicfillingremnantsfromovalrootcanalsanexvivostudy
AT brzovicrajicvalentina efficacyoferyaglaseractivatedshockwaveenhancedemissionphotoacousticstreamingcomparedtoultrasonicallyactivatedirrigationandneedleirrigationintheremovalofbioceramicfillingremnantsfromovalrootcanalsanexvivostudy
AT anicivica efficacyoferyaglaseractivatedshockwaveenhancedemissionphotoacousticstreamingcomparedtoultrasonicallyactivatedirrigationandneedleirrigationintheremovalofbioceramicfillingremnantsfromovalrootcanalsanexvivostudy
AT bagoivona efficacyoferyaglaseractivatedshockwaveenhancedemissionphotoacousticstreamingcomparedtoultrasonicallyactivatedirrigationandneedleirrigationintheremovalofbioceramicfillingremnantsfromovalrootcanalsanexvivostudy