Cargando…

Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future

This article provides an overview of verbal lie detection research. This type of research began in the 1970s with examining the relationship between deception and specific words. We briefly review this initial research. In the late 1980s, Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) emerged, a veracity as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vrij, Aldert, Granhag, Pär Anders, Ashkenazi, Tzachi, Ganis, Giorgio, Leal, Sharon, Fisher, Ronald P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9775025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36552104
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121644
_version_ 1784855542411296768
author Vrij, Aldert
Granhag, Pär Anders
Ashkenazi, Tzachi
Ganis, Giorgio
Leal, Sharon
Fisher, Ronald P.
author_facet Vrij, Aldert
Granhag, Pär Anders
Ashkenazi, Tzachi
Ganis, Giorgio
Leal, Sharon
Fisher, Ronald P.
author_sort Vrij, Aldert
collection PubMed
description This article provides an overview of verbal lie detection research. This type of research began in the 1970s with examining the relationship between deception and specific words. We briefly review this initial research. In the late 1980s, Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) emerged, a veracity assessment tool containing a list of verbal criteria. This was followed by Reality Monitoring (RM) and Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN), two other veracity assessment tools that contain lists of verbal criteria. We discuss their contents, theoretical rationales, and ability to identify truths and lies. We also discuss similarities and differences between CBCA, RM, and SCAN. In the mid 2000s, ‘Interviewing to deception’ emerged, with the goal of developing specific interview protocols aimed at enhancing or eliciting verbal veracity cues. We outline the four most widely researched interview protocols to date: the Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE), Verifiability Approach (VA), Cognitive Credibility Assessment (CCA), and Reality Interviewing (RI). We briefly discuss the working of these protocols, their theoretical rationales and empirical support, as well as the similarities and differences between them. We conclude this article with elaborating on how neuroscientists can inform and improve verbal lie detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9775025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97750252022-12-23 Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future Vrij, Aldert Granhag, Pär Anders Ashkenazi, Tzachi Ganis, Giorgio Leal, Sharon Fisher, Ronald P. Brain Sci Article This article provides an overview of verbal lie detection research. This type of research began in the 1970s with examining the relationship between deception and specific words. We briefly review this initial research. In the late 1980s, Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) emerged, a veracity assessment tool containing a list of verbal criteria. This was followed by Reality Monitoring (RM) and Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN), two other veracity assessment tools that contain lists of verbal criteria. We discuss their contents, theoretical rationales, and ability to identify truths and lies. We also discuss similarities and differences between CBCA, RM, and SCAN. In the mid 2000s, ‘Interviewing to deception’ emerged, with the goal of developing specific interview protocols aimed at enhancing or eliciting verbal veracity cues. We outline the four most widely researched interview protocols to date: the Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE), Verifiability Approach (VA), Cognitive Credibility Assessment (CCA), and Reality Interviewing (RI). We briefly discuss the working of these protocols, their theoretical rationales and empirical support, as well as the similarities and differences between them. We conclude this article with elaborating on how neuroscientists can inform and improve verbal lie detection. MDPI 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9775025/ /pubmed/36552104 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121644 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vrij, Aldert
Granhag, Pär Anders
Ashkenazi, Tzachi
Ganis, Giorgio
Leal, Sharon
Fisher, Ronald P.
Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future
title Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future
title_full Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future
title_fullStr Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future
title_full_unstemmed Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future
title_short Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future
title_sort verbal lie detection: its past, present and future
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9775025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36552104
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121644
work_keys_str_mv AT vrijaldert verballiedetectionitspastpresentandfuture
AT granhagparanders verballiedetectionitspastpresentandfuture
AT ashkenazitzachi verballiedetectionitspastpresentandfuture
AT ganisgiorgio verballiedetectionitspastpresentandfuture
AT lealsharon verballiedetectionitspastpresentandfuture
AT fisherronaldp verballiedetectionitspastpresentandfuture