Cargando…
Cell Type-Specific Effects of Implant Provisional Restoration Materials on the Growth and Function of Human Fibroblasts and Osteoblasts
Implant provisional restorations should ideally be nontoxic to the contacting and adjacent tissues, create anatomical and biophysiological stability, and establish a soft tissue seal through interactions between prosthesis, soft tissue, and alveolar bone. However, there is a lack of robust, systemat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9775359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36546943 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7040243 |
_version_ | 1784855624998191104 |
---|---|
author | Matsuura, Takanori Komatsu, Keiji Chao, Denny Lin, Yu-Chun Oberoi, Nimish McCulloch, Kalie Cheng, James Orellana, Daniela Ogawa, Takahiro |
author_facet | Matsuura, Takanori Komatsu, Keiji Chao, Denny Lin, Yu-Chun Oberoi, Nimish McCulloch, Kalie Cheng, James Orellana, Daniela Ogawa, Takahiro |
author_sort | Matsuura, Takanori |
collection | PubMed |
description | Implant provisional restorations should ideally be nontoxic to the contacting and adjacent tissues, create anatomical and biophysiological stability, and establish a soft tissue seal through interactions between prosthesis, soft tissue, and alveolar bone. However, there is a lack of robust, systematic, and fundamental data to inform clinical decision making. Here we systematically explored the biocompatibility of fibroblasts and osteoblasts in direct contact with, or close proximity to, provisional restoration materials. Human gingival fibroblasts and osteoblasts were cultured on the “contact” effect and around the “proximity” effect with various provisional materials: bis-acrylic, composite, self-curing acrylic, and milled acrylic, with titanium alloy as a bioinert control. The number of fibroblasts and osteoblasts surviving and attaching to and around the materials varied considerably depending on the material, with milled acrylic the most biocompatible and similar to titanium alloy, followed by self-curing acrylic and little to no attachment on or around bis-acrylic and composite materials. Milled and self-curing acrylics similarly favored subsequent cellular proliferation and physiological functions such as collagen production in fibroblasts and alkaline phosphatase activity in osteoblasts. Neither fibroblasts nor osteoblasts showed a functional phenotype when cultured with bis-acrylic or composite. By calculating a biocompatibility index for each material, we established that fibroblasts were more resistant to the cytotoxicity induced by most materials in direct contact, however, the osteoblasts were more resistant when the materials were in close proximity. In conclusion, there was a wide variation in the cytotoxicity of implant provisional restoration materials ranging from lethal and tolerant to near inert, and this cytotoxicity may be received differently between the different cell types and depending on their physical interrelationships. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9775359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97753592022-12-23 Cell Type-Specific Effects of Implant Provisional Restoration Materials on the Growth and Function of Human Fibroblasts and Osteoblasts Matsuura, Takanori Komatsu, Keiji Chao, Denny Lin, Yu-Chun Oberoi, Nimish McCulloch, Kalie Cheng, James Orellana, Daniela Ogawa, Takahiro Biomimetics (Basel) Article Implant provisional restorations should ideally be nontoxic to the contacting and adjacent tissues, create anatomical and biophysiological stability, and establish a soft tissue seal through interactions between prosthesis, soft tissue, and alveolar bone. However, there is a lack of robust, systematic, and fundamental data to inform clinical decision making. Here we systematically explored the biocompatibility of fibroblasts and osteoblasts in direct contact with, or close proximity to, provisional restoration materials. Human gingival fibroblasts and osteoblasts were cultured on the “contact” effect and around the “proximity” effect with various provisional materials: bis-acrylic, composite, self-curing acrylic, and milled acrylic, with titanium alloy as a bioinert control. The number of fibroblasts and osteoblasts surviving and attaching to and around the materials varied considerably depending on the material, with milled acrylic the most biocompatible and similar to titanium alloy, followed by self-curing acrylic and little to no attachment on or around bis-acrylic and composite materials. Milled and self-curing acrylics similarly favored subsequent cellular proliferation and physiological functions such as collagen production in fibroblasts and alkaline phosphatase activity in osteoblasts. Neither fibroblasts nor osteoblasts showed a functional phenotype when cultured with bis-acrylic or composite. By calculating a biocompatibility index for each material, we established that fibroblasts were more resistant to the cytotoxicity induced by most materials in direct contact, however, the osteoblasts were more resistant when the materials were in close proximity. In conclusion, there was a wide variation in the cytotoxicity of implant provisional restoration materials ranging from lethal and tolerant to near inert, and this cytotoxicity may be received differently between the different cell types and depending on their physical interrelationships. MDPI 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9775359/ /pubmed/36546943 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7040243 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Matsuura, Takanori Komatsu, Keiji Chao, Denny Lin, Yu-Chun Oberoi, Nimish McCulloch, Kalie Cheng, James Orellana, Daniela Ogawa, Takahiro Cell Type-Specific Effects of Implant Provisional Restoration Materials on the Growth and Function of Human Fibroblasts and Osteoblasts |
title | Cell Type-Specific Effects of Implant Provisional Restoration Materials on the Growth and Function of Human Fibroblasts and Osteoblasts |
title_full | Cell Type-Specific Effects of Implant Provisional Restoration Materials on the Growth and Function of Human Fibroblasts and Osteoblasts |
title_fullStr | Cell Type-Specific Effects of Implant Provisional Restoration Materials on the Growth and Function of Human Fibroblasts and Osteoblasts |
title_full_unstemmed | Cell Type-Specific Effects of Implant Provisional Restoration Materials on the Growth and Function of Human Fibroblasts and Osteoblasts |
title_short | Cell Type-Specific Effects of Implant Provisional Restoration Materials on the Growth and Function of Human Fibroblasts and Osteoblasts |
title_sort | cell type-specific effects of implant provisional restoration materials on the growth and function of human fibroblasts and osteoblasts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9775359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36546943 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7040243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsuuratakanori celltypespecificeffectsofimplantprovisionalrestorationmaterialsonthegrowthandfunctionofhumanfibroblastsandosteoblasts AT komatsukeiji celltypespecificeffectsofimplantprovisionalrestorationmaterialsonthegrowthandfunctionofhumanfibroblastsandosteoblasts AT chaodenny celltypespecificeffectsofimplantprovisionalrestorationmaterialsonthegrowthandfunctionofhumanfibroblastsandosteoblasts AT linyuchun celltypespecificeffectsofimplantprovisionalrestorationmaterialsonthegrowthandfunctionofhumanfibroblastsandosteoblasts AT oberoinimish celltypespecificeffectsofimplantprovisionalrestorationmaterialsonthegrowthandfunctionofhumanfibroblastsandosteoblasts AT mccullochkalie celltypespecificeffectsofimplantprovisionalrestorationmaterialsonthegrowthandfunctionofhumanfibroblastsandosteoblasts AT chengjames celltypespecificeffectsofimplantprovisionalrestorationmaterialsonthegrowthandfunctionofhumanfibroblastsandosteoblasts AT orellanadaniela celltypespecificeffectsofimplantprovisionalrestorationmaterialsonthegrowthandfunctionofhumanfibroblastsandosteoblasts AT ogawatakahiro celltypespecificeffectsofimplantprovisionalrestorationmaterialsonthegrowthandfunctionofhumanfibroblastsandosteoblasts |