Cargando…

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Many clinical trials have investigated the role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in pleural mesothelioma (PM), with contrasting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials testing single-agent ICIs or combined treatments in PM patients. Combin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gemelli, Maria, Cortinovis, Diego Luigi, Baggi, Alice, di Mauro, Pierluigi, Calza, Stefano, Berruti, Alfredo, Grisanti, Salvatore, Rota, Matteo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9775536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36551550
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246063
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: Many clinical trials have investigated the role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in pleural mesothelioma (PM), with contrasting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials testing single-agent ICIs or combined treatments in PM patients. Combined ICI treatments have higher Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) rates when compared with single agents but a similar Overall Response Rate (ORR) and a higher rate of adverse events (AEs). ICI efficacy was independent of the treatment line. ABSTRACT: Many clinical trials have investigated the role of ICIs in PM, with contrasting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials testing single-agent anti-Programmed Death -1 (PD-1)/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1), anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) or combined treatment in PM patients, analyzing response and survival rate as well as safety data. We selected 17 studies including 2328 patients. Both OS and PFS rates were significantly higher with combined ICI treatments than with single agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively) or anti CTLA-4 (p < 0.001) treatments. ORR and DCR for all ICI treatments were 20% (95% CI 13–27%) and 56% (95% CI 45–67%), respectively, and they did not significantly differ between combined and single agent treatments (p = 0.088 and p = 0.058, respectively). The 12-month OS and 6-month PFS rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.0545 and p = 0.1464, respectively) among pre-treated or untreated patients. Combined ICI treatments had a significantly higher rate of Adverse Events (AEs) (p = 0.01). PD-L1-positive patients had a higher probability of response and survival. In conclusion, combined ICI treatments have higher efficacy than single agents but are limited by higher toxicity. Efficacy was independent of treatment line, so a customized sequential strategy should still be speculated. PD-L1 expression could influence response to ICIs; however, reliable biomarkers are warranted.