Cargando…

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Many clinical trials have investigated the role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in pleural mesothelioma (PM), with contrasting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials testing single-agent ICIs or combined treatments in PM patients. Combin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gemelli, Maria, Cortinovis, Diego Luigi, Baggi, Alice, di Mauro, Pierluigi, Calza, Stefano, Berruti, Alfredo, Grisanti, Salvatore, Rota, Matteo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9775536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36551550
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246063
_version_ 1784855668473200640
author Gemelli, Maria
Cortinovis, Diego Luigi
Baggi, Alice
di Mauro, Pierluigi
Calza, Stefano
Berruti, Alfredo
Grisanti, Salvatore
Rota, Matteo
author_facet Gemelli, Maria
Cortinovis, Diego Luigi
Baggi, Alice
di Mauro, Pierluigi
Calza, Stefano
Berruti, Alfredo
Grisanti, Salvatore
Rota, Matteo
author_sort Gemelli, Maria
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Many clinical trials have investigated the role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in pleural mesothelioma (PM), with contrasting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials testing single-agent ICIs or combined treatments in PM patients. Combined ICI treatments have higher Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) rates when compared with single agents but a similar Overall Response Rate (ORR) and a higher rate of adverse events (AEs). ICI efficacy was independent of the treatment line. ABSTRACT: Many clinical trials have investigated the role of ICIs in PM, with contrasting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials testing single-agent anti-Programmed Death -1 (PD-1)/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1), anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) or combined treatment in PM patients, analyzing response and survival rate as well as safety data. We selected 17 studies including 2328 patients. Both OS and PFS rates were significantly higher with combined ICI treatments than with single agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively) or anti CTLA-4 (p < 0.001) treatments. ORR and DCR for all ICI treatments were 20% (95% CI 13–27%) and 56% (95% CI 45–67%), respectively, and they did not significantly differ between combined and single agent treatments (p = 0.088 and p = 0.058, respectively). The 12-month OS and 6-month PFS rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.0545 and p = 0.1464, respectively) among pre-treated or untreated patients. Combined ICI treatments had a significantly higher rate of Adverse Events (AEs) (p = 0.01). PD-L1-positive patients had a higher probability of response and survival. In conclusion, combined ICI treatments have higher efficacy than single agents but are limited by higher toxicity. Efficacy was independent of treatment line, so a customized sequential strategy should still be speculated. PD-L1 expression could influence response to ICIs; however, reliable biomarkers are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9775536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97755362022-12-23 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Gemelli, Maria Cortinovis, Diego Luigi Baggi, Alice di Mauro, Pierluigi Calza, Stefano Berruti, Alfredo Grisanti, Salvatore Rota, Matteo Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Many clinical trials have investigated the role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in pleural mesothelioma (PM), with contrasting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials testing single-agent ICIs or combined treatments in PM patients. Combined ICI treatments have higher Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) rates when compared with single agents but a similar Overall Response Rate (ORR) and a higher rate of adverse events (AEs). ICI efficacy was independent of the treatment line. ABSTRACT: Many clinical trials have investigated the role of ICIs in PM, with contrasting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials testing single-agent anti-Programmed Death -1 (PD-1)/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1), anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) or combined treatment in PM patients, analyzing response and survival rate as well as safety data. We selected 17 studies including 2328 patients. Both OS and PFS rates were significantly higher with combined ICI treatments than with single agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively) or anti CTLA-4 (p < 0.001) treatments. ORR and DCR for all ICI treatments were 20% (95% CI 13–27%) and 56% (95% CI 45–67%), respectively, and they did not significantly differ between combined and single agent treatments (p = 0.088 and p = 0.058, respectively). The 12-month OS and 6-month PFS rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.0545 and p = 0.1464, respectively) among pre-treated or untreated patients. Combined ICI treatments had a significantly higher rate of Adverse Events (AEs) (p = 0.01). PD-L1-positive patients had a higher probability of response and survival. In conclusion, combined ICI treatments have higher efficacy than single agents but are limited by higher toxicity. Efficacy was independent of treatment line, so a customized sequential strategy should still be speculated. PD-L1 expression could influence response to ICIs; however, reliable biomarkers are warranted. MDPI 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9775536/ /pubmed/36551550 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246063 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gemelli, Maria
Cortinovis, Diego Luigi
Baggi, Alice
di Mauro, Pierluigi
Calza, Stefano
Berruti, Alfredo
Grisanti, Salvatore
Rota, Matteo
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort immune checkpoint inhibitors in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9775536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36551550
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246063
work_keys_str_mv AT gemellimaria immunecheckpointinhibitorsinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cortinovisdiegoluigi immunecheckpointinhibitorsinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baggialice immunecheckpointinhibitorsinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dimauropierluigi immunecheckpointinhibitorsinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT calzastefano immunecheckpointinhibitorsinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT berrutialfredo immunecheckpointinhibitorsinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT grisantisalvatore immunecheckpointinhibitorsinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rotamatteo immunecheckpointinhibitorsinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis