Cargando…

Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods for Subtyping of Cutaneous Melanoma

There is a growing number of multi-domain genomic datasets for human tumors. Multi-domain data are usually interpreted after separately analyzing single-domain data and integrating the results post hoc. Data fusion techniques allow for the real integration of multi-domain data to ideally improve the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amaro, Adriana, Pfeffer, Max, Pfeffer, Ulrich, Reggiani, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9775581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36551996
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10123240
_version_ 1784855679744344064
author Amaro, Adriana
Pfeffer, Max
Pfeffer, Ulrich
Reggiani, Francesco
author_facet Amaro, Adriana
Pfeffer, Max
Pfeffer, Ulrich
Reggiani, Francesco
author_sort Amaro, Adriana
collection PubMed
description There is a growing number of multi-domain genomic datasets for human tumors. Multi-domain data are usually interpreted after separately analyzing single-domain data and integrating the results post hoc. Data fusion techniques allow for the real integration of multi-domain data to ideally improve the tumor classification results for the prognosis and prediction of response to therapy. We have previously described the joint singular value decomposition (jSVD) technique as a means of data fusion. Here, we report on the development of these methods in open source code based on R and Python and on the application of these data fusion methods. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Skin Cutaneous Melanoma (SKCM) dataset was used as a benchmark to evaluate the potential of the data fusion approaches to improve molecular classification of cancers in a clinically relevant manner. Our data show that the data fusion approach does not generate classification results superior to those obtained using single-domain data. Data from different domains are not entirely independent from each other, and molecular classes are characterized by features that penetrate different domains. Data fusion techniques might be better suited for response prediction, where they could contribute to the identification of predictive features in a domain-independent manner to be used as biomarkers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9775581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97755812022-12-23 Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods for Subtyping of Cutaneous Melanoma Amaro, Adriana Pfeffer, Max Pfeffer, Ulrich Reggiani, Francesco Biomedicines Article There is a growing number of multi-domain genomic datasets for human tumors. Multi-domain data are usually interpreted after separately analyzing single-domain data and integrating the results post hoc. Data fusion techniques allow for the real integration of multi-domain data to ideally improve the tumor classification results for the prognosis and prediction of response to therapy. We have previously described the joint singular value decomposition (jSVD) technique as a means of data fusion. Here, we report on the development of these methods in open source code based on R and Python and on the application of these data fusion methods. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Skin Cutaneous Melanoma (SKCM) dataset was used as a benchmark to evaluate the potential of the data fusion approaches to improve molecular classification of cancers in a clinically relevant manner. Our data show that the data fusion approach does not generate classification results superior to those obtained using single-domain data. Data from different domains are not entirely independent from each other, and molecular classes are characterized by features that penetrate different domains. Data fusion techniques might be better suited for response prediction, where they could contribute to the identification of predictive features in a domain-independent manner to be used as biomarkers. MDPI 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9775581/ /pubmed/36551996 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10123240 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Amaro, Adriana
Pfeffer, Max
Pfeffer, Ulrich
Reggiani, Francesco
Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods for Subtyping of Cutaneous Melanoma
title Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods for Subtyping of Cutaneous Melanoma
title_full Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods for Subtyping of Cutaneous Melanoma
title_fullStr Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods for Subtyping of Cutaneous Melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods for Subtyping of Cutaneous Melanoma
title_short Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods for Subtyping of Cutaneous Melanoma
title_sort evaluation and comparison of multi-omics data integration methods for subtyping of cutaneous melanoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9775581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36551996
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10123240
work_keys_str_mv AT amaroadriana evaluationandcomparisonofmultiomicsdataintegrationmethodsforsubtypingofcutaneousmelanoma
AT pfeffermax evaluationandcomparisonofmultiomicsdataintegrationmethodsforsubtypingofcutaneousmelanoma
AT pfefferulrich evaluationandcomparisonofmultiomicsdataintegrationmethodsforsubtypingofcutaneousmelanoma
AT reggianifrancesco evaluationandcomparisonofmultiomicsdataintegrationmethodsforsubtypingofcutaneousmelanoma