Cargando…

Cognition and Neuropsychological Changes at Altitude—A Systematic Review of Literature

High-altitude (HA) exposure affects cognitive functions, but studies have found inconsistent results. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of HA exposure on cognitive functions in healthy subjects. A structural overview of the applied neuropsychological tests was provided wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bliemsrieder, Kathrin, Weiss, Elisabeth Margarete, Fischer, Rainald, Brugger, Hermann, Sperner-Unterweger, Barbara, Hüfner, Katharina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9775937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36552195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121736
_version_ 1784855755106549760
author Bliemsrieder, Kathrin
Weiss, Elisabeth Margarete
Fischer, Rainald
Brugger, Hermann
Sperner-Unterweger, Barbara
Hüfner, Katharina
author_facet Bliemsrieder, Kathrin
Weiss, Elisabeth Margarete
Fischer, Rainald
Brugger, Hermann
Sperner-Unterweger, Barbara
Hüfner, Katharina
author_sort Bliemsrieder, Kathrin
collection PubMed
description High-altitude (HA) exposure affects cognitive functions, but studies have found inconsistent results. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of HA exposure on cognitive functions in healthy subjects. A structural overview of the applied neuropsychological tests was provided with a classification of superordinate cognitive domains. A literature search was performed using PubMed up to October 2021 according to PRISMA guidelines. Eligibility criteria included a healthy human cohort exposed to altitude in the field (at minimum 2440 m [8000 ft]) or in a hypoxic environment in a laboratory, and an assessment of cognitive domains. The literature search identified 52 studies (29 of these were field studies; altitude range: 2440 m–8848 m [8000–29,029 ft]). Researchers applied 112 different neuropsychological tests. Attentional capacity, concentration, and executive functions were the most frequently studied. In the laboratory, the ratio of altitude-induced impairments (64.7%) was twice as high compared to results showing no change or improved results (35.3%), but altitudes studied were similar in the chamber compared to field studies. In the field, the opposite results were found (66.4 % no change or improvements, 33.6% impairments). Since better acclimatization can be assumed in the field studies, the findings support the hypothesis that sufficient acclimatization has beneficial effects on cognitive functions at HA. However, it also becomes apparent that research in this area would benefit most if a consensus could be reached on a standardized framework of freely available neurocognitive tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9775937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97759372022-12-23 Cognition and Neuropsychological Changes at Altitude—A Systematic Review of Literature Bliemsrieder, Kathrin Weiss, Elisabeth Margarete Fischer, Rainald Brugger, Hermann Sperner-Unterweger, Barbara Hüfner, Katharina Brain Sci Review High-altitude (HA) exposure affects cognitive functions, but studies have found inconsistent results. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of HA exposure on cognitive functions in healthy subjects. A structural overview of the applied neuropsychological tests was provided with a classification of superordinate cognitive domains. A literature search was performed using PubMed up to October 2021 according to PRISMA guidelines. Eligibility criteria included a healthy human cohort exposed to altitude in the field (at minimum 2440 m [8000 ft]) or in a hypoxic environment in a laboratory, and an assessment of cognitive domains. The literature search identified 52 studies (29 of these were field studies; altitude range: 2440 m–8848 m [8000–29,029 ft]). Researchers applied 112 different neuropsychological tests. Attentional capacity, concentration, and executive functions were the most frequently studied. In the laboratory, the ratio of altitude-induced impairments (64.7%) was twice as high compared to results showing no change or improved results (35.3%), but altitudes studied were similar in the chamber compared to field studies. In the field, the opposite results were found (66.4 % no change or improvements, 33.6% impairments). Since better acclimatization can be assumed in the field studies, the findings support the hypothesis that sufficient acclimatization has beneficial effects on cognitive functions at HA. However, it also becomes apparent that research in this area would benefit most if a consensus could be reached on a standardized framework of freely available neurocognitive tests. MDPI 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9775937/ /pubmed/36552195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121736 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bliemsrieder, Kathrin
Weiss, Elisabeth Margarete
Fischer, Rainald
Brugger, Hermann
Sperner-Unterweger, Barbara
Hüfner, Katharina
Cognition and Neuropsychological Changes at Altitude—A Systematic Review of Literature
title Cognition and Neuropsychological Changes at Altitude—A Systematic Review of Literature
title_full Cognition and Neuropsychological Changes at Altitude—A Systematic Review of Literature
title_fullStr Cognition and Neuropsychological Changes at Altitude—A Systematic Review of Literature
title_full_unstemmed Cognition and Neuropsychological Changes at Altitude—A Systematic Review of Literature
title_short Cognition and Neuropsychological Changes at Altitude—A Systematic Review of Literature
title_sort cognition and neuropsychological changes at altitude—a systematic review of literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9775937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36552195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12121736
work_keys_str_mv AT bliemsriederkathrin cognitionandneuropsychologicalchangesataltitudeasystematicreviewofliterature
AT weisselisabethmargarete cognitionandneuropsychologicalchangesataltitudeasystematicreviewofliterature
AT fischerrainald cognitionandneuropsychologicalchangesataltitudeasystematicreviewofliterature
AT bruggerhermann cognitionandneuropsychologicalchangesataltitudeasystematicreviewofliterature
AT spernerunterwegerbarbara cognitionandneuropsychologicalchangesataltitudeasystematicreviewofliterature
AT hufnerkatharina cognitionandneuropsychologicalchangesataltitudeasystematicreviewofliterature