Cargando…
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Introduction: One of the most effective diagnostic tools for pancreatic cancer is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or biopsy (EUS-FNB). Several randomized clinical trials have compared different EUS tissue sampling needles for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Objectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9776533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36552957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12122951 |
_version_ | 1784855889090445312 |
---|---|
author | Hassan, Galab M. Laporte, Louise Paquin, Sarto C. Menard, Charles Sahai, Anand V. Mâsse, Benoît Trottier, Helen |
author_facet | Hassan, Galab M. Laporte, Louise Paquin, Sarto C. Menard, Charles Sahai, Anand V. Mâsse, Benoît Trottier, Helen |
author_sort | Hassan, Galab M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: One of the most effective diagnostic tools for pancreatic cancer is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or biopsy (EUS-FNB). Several randomized clinical trials have compared different EUS tissue sampling needles for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided FNA as EUS-FNB needles for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Method: A literature review with a meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guide. The databases of PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar were used, including studies published between 2011–2021 comparing the diagnostic yield (diagnostic accuracy or probability of positivity, sensitivity, specificity, predictive value) of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Random effect models allowed estimation of the pooled odds ratio with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Results: Nine randomized control trials were selected out of 5802 articles identified. Among these, five studies found no statistically significant difference between the EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB, whereas the other four did. The meta-analysis found EUS-FNB accuracy superior to EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer with a pooled odds ratio of 1.87 (IC 95%: 1.33–2.63). Conclusion: As compared to EUS-FNA, EUS-FNB seems to improve diagnostic accuracy when applied to suspicious pancreatic lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9776533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97765332022-12-23 Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hassan, Galab M. Laporte, Louise Paquin, Sarto C. Menard, Charles Sahai, Anand V. Mâsse, Benoît Trottier, Helen Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review Introduction: One of the most effective diagnostic tools for pancreatic cancer is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or biopsy (EUS-FNB). Several randomized clinical trials have compared different EUS tissue sampling needles for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided FNA as EUS-FNB needles for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Method: A literature review with a meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guide. The databases of PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar were used, including studies published between 2011–2021 comparing the diagnostic yield (diagnostic accuracy or probability of positivity, sensitivity, specificity, predictive value) of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Random effect models allowed estimation of the pooled odds ratio with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Results: Nine randomized control trials were selected out of 5802 articles identified. Among these, five studies found no statistically significant difference between the EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB, whereas the other four did. The meta-analysis found EUS-FNB accuracy superior to EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer with a pooled odds ratio of 1.87 (IC 95%: 1.33–2.63). Conclusion: As compared to EUS-FNA, EUS-FNB seems to improve diagnostic accuracy when applied to suspicious pancreatic lesions. MDPI 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9776533/ /pubmed/36552957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12122951 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Hassan, Galab M. Laporte, Louise Paquin, Sarto C. Menard, Charles Sahai, Anand V. Mâsse, Benoît Trottier, Helen Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration versus endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy for pancreatic cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9776533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36552957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12122951 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hassangalabm endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT laportelouise endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT paquinsartoc endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT menardcharles endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sahaianandv endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT massebenoit endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT trottierhelen endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationversusendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforpancreaticcancerdiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |