Cargando…
Comparison of 22G Fork-Tip and Franseen Needles and Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is less accurate in obtaining samples from gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (SELs) ≤2 cm than from pancreatic cancers. The present study compared the usefulness of 22G Fork-tip and Franseen needles for EUS-TA and assessed the abili...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9776934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553129 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123122 |
_version_ | 1784855980737036288 |
---|---|
author | Yamashita, Yasunobu Ashida, Reiko Yamazaki, Hirofumi Kawaji, Yuki Shimokawa, Toshio Tamura, Takashi Hatamaru, Keiichi Itonaga, Masahiro Kitano, Masayuki |
author_facet | Yamashita, Yasunobu Ashida, Reiko Yamazaki, Hirofumi Kawaji, Yuki Shimokawa, Toshio Tamura, Takashi Hatamaru, Keiichi Itonaga, Masahiro Kitano, Masayuki |
author_sort | Yamashita, Yasunobu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is less accurate in obtaining samples from gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (SELs) ≤2 cm than from pancreatic cancers. The present study compared the usefulness of 22G Fork-tip and Franseen needles for EUS-TA and assessed the ability of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) to diagnose SELs ≤2 cm. Fifty-seven patients who underwent EUS-TA for SELs ≤2 cm were evaluated. The primary endpoint was to compare the rate of acquisition of sufficient samples by these two needles. Secondary endpoints included technical success rate, adverse events, numbers of needle passes, and diagnostic ability of CH-EUS for SELs. Of the 57 included patients, 23 and 34 underwent EUS-TA with Fork-tip and Franseen needles, respectively. Technical success rates were 100% with both needles and adverse events occurred in zero (0%) and one (2.9%) patient with Fork-tip and Franseen needles, respectively. The rate of adequate sample acquisition was significantly higher using Fork-tip than Franseen needles (96% vs. 74%; p = 0.038). The hyper- or iso-vascular pattern on CH-EUS correlated significantly with a diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (p < 0.001). EUS-TA with Fork-tip needles were superior to EUS-TA with Franseen needles in acquiring sufficient samples and CH-EUS was also useful for the diagnosis of SELs ≤2 cm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9776934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97769342022-12-23 Comparison of 22G Fork-Tip and Franseen Needles and Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions Yamashita, Yasunobu Ashida, Reiko Yamazaki, Hirofumi Kawaji, Yuki Shimokawa, Toshio Tamura, Takashi Hatamaru, Keiichi Itonaga, Masahiro Kitano, Masayuki Diagnostics (Basel) Article Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is less accurate in obtaining samples from gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (SELs) ≤2 cm than from pancreatic cancers. The present study compared the usefulness of 22G Fork-tip and Franseen needles for EUS-TA and assessed the ability of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) to diagnose SELs ≤2 cm. Fifty-seven patients who underwent EUS-TA for SELs ≤2 cm were evaluated. The primary endpoint was to compare the rate of acquisition of sufficient samples by these two needles. Secondary endpoints included technical success rate, adverse events, numbers of needle passes, and diagnostic ability of CH-EUS for SELs. Of the 57 included patients, 23 and 34 underwent EUS-TA with Fork-tip and Franseen needles, respectively. Technical success rates were 100% with both needles and adverse events occurred in zero (0%) and one (2.9%) patient with Fork-tip and Franseen needles, respectively. The rate of adequate sample acquisition was significantly higher using Fork-tip than Franseen needles (96% vs. 74%; p = 0.038). The hyper- or iso-vascular pattern on CH-EUS correlated significantly with a diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (p < 0.001). EUS-TA with Fork-tip needles were superior to EUS-TA with Franseen needles in acquiring sufficient samples and CH-EUS was also useful for the diagnosis of SELs ≤2 cm. MDPI 2022-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9776934/ /pubmed/36553129 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123122 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yamashita, Yasunobu Ashida, Reiko Yamazaki, Hirofumi Kawaji, Yuki Shimokawa, Toshio Tamura, Takashi Hatamaru, Keiichi Itonaga, Masahiro Kitano, Masayuki Comparison of 22G Fork-Tip and Franseen Needles and Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions |
title | Comparison of 22G Fork-Tip and Franseen Needles and Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions |
title_full | Comparison of 22G Fork-Tip and Franseen Needles and Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions |
title_fullStr | Comparison of 22G Fork-Tip and Franseen Needles and Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of 22G Fork-Tip and Franseen Needles and Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions |
title_short | Comparison of 22G Fork-Tip and Franseen Needles and Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions |
title_sort | comparison of 22g fork-tip and franseen needles and usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9776934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553129 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamashitayasunobu comparisonof22gforktipandfranseenneedlesandusefulnessofcontrastenhancedendoscopicultrasoundfordiagnosisofuppergastrointestinalsubepitheliallesions AT ashidareiko comparisonof22gforktipandfranseenneedlesandusefulnessofcontrastenhancedendoscopicultrasoundfordiagnosisofuppergastrointestinalsubepitheliallesions AT yamazakihirofumi comparisonof22gforktipandfranseenneedlesandusefulnessofcontrastenhancedendoscopicultrasoundfordiagnosisofuppergastrointestinalsubepitheliallesions AT kawajiyuki comparisonof22gforktipandfranseenneedlesandusefulnessofcontrastenhancedendoscopicultrasoundfordiagnosisofuppergastrointestinalsubepitheliallesions AT shimokawatoshio comparisonof22gforktipandfranseenneedlesandusefulnessofcontrastenhancedendoscopicultrasoundfordiagnosisofuppergastrointestinalsubepitheliallesions AT tamuratakashi comparisonof22gforktipandfranseenneedlesandusefulnessofcontrastenhancedendoscopicultrasoundfordiagnosisofuppergastrointestinalsubepitheliallesions AT hatamarukeiichi comparisonof22gforktipandfranseenneedlesandusefulnessofcontrastenhancedendoscopicultrasoundfordiagnosisofuppergastrointestinalsubepitheliallesions AT itonagamasahiro comparisonof22gforktipandfranseenneedlesandusefulnessofcontrastenhancedendoscopicultrasoundfordiagnosisofuppergastrointestinalsubepitheliallesions AT kitanomasayuki comparisonof22gforktipandfranseenneedlesandusefulnessofcontrastenhancedendoscopicultrasoundfordiagnosisofuppergastrointestinalsubepitheliallesions |