Cargando…

Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted?

Metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with a rather dismal 5-year overall survival. The liver is the most commonly affected organ. Improved 5-year survival rates after successful hepatic resections for metastases confined to the liver have been reported. Certainly, a hepatectomy that results in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Symeonidis, Dimitrios, Tepetes, Konstantinos, Tzovaras, George, Kissa, Labrini, Samara, Athina A., Bompou, Effrosyni, Zacharoulis, Dimitrios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36547120
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clinpract12060112
_version_ 1784856041447489536
author Symeonidis, Dimitrios
Tepetes, Konstantinos
Tzovaras, George
Kissa, Labrini
Samara, Athina A.
Bompou, Effrosyni
Zacharoulis, Dimitrios
author_facet Symeonidis, Dimitrios
Tepetes, Konstantinos
Tzovaras, George
Kissa, Labrini
Samara, Athina A.
Bompou, Effrosyni
Zacharoulis, Dimitrios
author_sort Symeonidis, Dimitrios
collection PubMed
description Metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with a rather dismal 5-year overall survival. The liver is the most commonly affected organ. Improved 5-year survival rates after successful hepatic resections for metastases confined to the liver have been reported. Certainly, a hepatectomy that results in an incomplete tumor resection, in terms of leaving macroscopic residual tumor in the future liver remnant, is not associated with survival benefits. However, the prognostic implications of a microscopically positive surgical margin or a clear margin of less than 1 mm (R1) on pathology are debatable. Although it has been a field of extensive research, the relevant literature often reports contradictory results. The purpose of the present study was to define, assess the risk factors for, and, ultimately, analyze the effect that an R1 hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases might have on local recurrence rates and long-term prognosis by reviewing the relevant literature. Achieving an R0 hepatic resection, optimally with more than 1 mm of clear margin, should always be the goal. However, in the era of the aggressive multimodality treatment of liver metastatic colorectal cancer, an R1 resection might be the cost of increasing the pool of patients finally eligible for resection. The majority of literature reports have highlighted the detrimental effect of R1 resections on local recurrence and overall survival. However, there are indeed studies that degraded the prognostic handicap as a consequence of an R1 resection in selected patients and highlighted the presence of RAS mutations, the response to chemotherapy, and, in general, factors that reflect the biology of the disease as important, if not the determinant, prognostic factors. In these patients, the aggressive disease biology seems to outperform the resection margin status as a prognostic factor, and the recorded differences between R1 and R0 resections are equalized. Properly and accurately defining this patient group is a future challenge in the field of the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9777184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97771842022-12-23 Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted? Symeonidis, Dimitrios Tepetes, Konstantinos Tzovaras, George Kissa, Labrini Samara, Athina A. Bompou, Effrosyni Zacharoulis, Dimitrios Clin Pract Review Metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with a rather dismal 5-year overall survival. The liver is the most commonly affected organ. Improved 5-year survival rates after successful hepatic resections for metastases confined to the liver have been reported. Certainly, a hepatectomy that results in an incomplete tumor resection, in terms of leaving macroscopic residual tumor in the future liver remnant, is not associated with survival benefits. However, the prognostic implications of a microscopically positive surgical margin or a clear margin of less than 1 mm (R1) on pathology are debatable. Although it has been a field of extensive research, the relevant literature often reports contradictory results. The purpose of the present study was to define, assess the risk factors for, and, ultimately, analyze the effect that an R1 hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases might have on local recurrence rates and long-term prognosis by reviewing the relevant literature. Achieving an R0 hepatic resection, optimally with more than 1 mm of clear margin, should always be the goal. However, in the era of the aggressive multimodality treatment of liver metastatic colorectal cancer, an R1 resection might be the cost of increasing the pool of patients finally eligible for resection. The majority of literature reports have highlighted the detrimental effect of R1 resections on local recurrence and overall survival. However, there are indeed studies that degraded the prognostic handicap as a consequence of an R1 resection in selected patients and highlighted the presence of RAS mutations, the response to chemotherapy, and, in general, factors that reflect the biology of the disease as important, if not the determinant, prognostic factors. In these patients, the aggressive disease biology seems to outperform the resection margin status as a prognostic factor, and the recorded differences between R1 and R0 resections are equalized. Properly and accurately defining this patient group is a future challenge in the field of the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases. MDPI 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9777184/ /pubmed/36547120 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clinpract12060112 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Symeonidis, Dimitrios
Tepetes, Konstantinos
Tzovaras, George
Kissa, Labrini
Samara, Athina A.
Bompou, Effrosyni
Zacharoulis, Dimitrios
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted?
title Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted?
title_full Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted?
title_fullStr Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted?
title_full_unstemmed Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted?
title_short Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted?
title_sort colorectal cancer liver metastases: is an r1 hepatic resection accepted?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36547120
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/clinpract12060112
work_keys_str_mv AT symeonidisdimitrios colorectalcancerlivermetastasesisanr1hepaticresectionaccepted
AT tepeteskonstantinos colorectalcancerlivermetastasesisanr1hepaticresectionaccepted
AT tzovarasgeorge colorectalcancerlivermetastasesisanr1hepaticresectionaccepted
AT kissalabrini colorectalcancerlivermetastasesisanr1hepaticresectionaccepted
AT samaraathinaa colorectalcancerlivermetastasesisanr1hepaticresectionaccepted
AT bompoueffrosyni colorectalcancerlivermetastasesisanr1hepaticresectionaccepted
AT zacharoulisdimitrios colorectalcancerlivermetastasesisanr1hepaticresectionaccepted