Cargando…
Easy and Affordable: A New Method for the Studying of Bacterial Biofilm Formation
Background: Bacterial biofilm formation (BBF) proves itself to be in the spotlight of microbiology research due to the wide variety of infections that it can be associated with, the involvement in food spoilage, industrial biofouling and perhaps sewage treatment. However, BBF remains difficult to st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36552883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11244119 |
_version_ | 1784856048843096064 |
---|---|
author | Toc, Dan Alexandru Csapai, Alexandra Popa, Florin Popa, Catalin Pascalau, Violeta Tosa, Nicoleta Botan, Alexandru Mihaila, Razvan Marian Costache, Carmen Anca Colosi, Ioana Alina Junie, Lia Monica |
author_facet | Toc, Dan Alexandru Csapai, Alexandra Popa, Florin Popa, Catalin Pascalau, Violeta Tosa, Nicoleta Botan, Alexandru Mihaila, Razvan Marian Costache, Carmen Anca Colosi, Ioana Alina Junie, Lia Monica |
author_sort | Toc, Dan Alexandru |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Bacterial biofilm formation (BBF) proves itself to be in the spotlight of microbiology research due to the wide variety of infections that it can be associated with, the involvement in food spoilage, industrial biofouling and perhaps sewage treatment. However, BBF remains difficult to study due to the lack of standardization of the existing methods and the expensive equipment needed. We aim to describe a new inexpensive and easy to reproduce protocol for a 3D-printed microfluidic device that can be used to study BBF in a dynamic manner. Methods: We used the SolidWorks 3D CAD Software (EducationEdition 2019–2020, Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France) to design the device and the Creality3D Ender 5 printer (Shenzhen Creality 3D Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) for its manufacture. We cultivated strains of Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For the biofilm evaluation we used optical coherence tomography (OCT), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and crystal violet staining technique. Results: Based on the analysis, Enterococcus faecalis seems to produce more biofilm in the first hours while Pseudomonas aeruginosa started to take the lead on biofilm production after 24 h. Conclusions: With an estimated cost around €0.1285 for one microfluidic device, a relatively inexpensive and easy alternative for the study of BBF was developed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9777215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97772152022-12-23 Easy and Affordable: A New Method for the Studying of Bacterial Biofilm Formation Toc, Dan Alexandru Csapai, Alexandra Popa, Florin Popa, Catalin Pascalau, Violeta Tosa, Nicoleta Botan, Alexandru Mihaila, Razvan Marian Costache, Carmen Anca Colosi, Ioana Alina Junie, Lia Monica Cells Article Background: Bacterial biofilm formation (BBF) proves itself to be in the spotlight of microbiology research due to the wide variety of infections that it can be associated with, the involvement in food spoilage, industrial biofouling and perhaps sewage treatment. However, BBF remains difficult to study due to the lack of standardization of the existing methods and the expensive equipment needed. We aim to describe a new inexpensive and easy to reproduce protocol for a 3D-printed microfluidic device that can be used to study BBF in a dynamic manner. Methods: We used the SolidWorks 3D CAD Software (EducationEdition 2019–2020, Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France) to design the device and the Creality3D Ender 5 printer (Shenzhen Creality 3D Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) for its manufacture. We cultivated strains of Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For the biofilm evaluation we used optical coherence tomography (OCT), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and crystal violet staining technique. Results: Based on the analysis, Enterococcus faecalis seems to produce more biofilm in the first hours while Pseudomonas aeruginosa started to take the lead on biofilm production after 24 h. Conclusions: With an estimated cost around €0.1285 for one microfluidic device, a relatively inexpensive and easy alternative for the study of BBF was developed. MDPI 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9777215/ /pubmed/36552883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11244119 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Toc, Dan Alexandru Csapai, Alexandra Popa, Florin Popa, Catalin Pascalau, Violeta Tosa, Nicoleta Botan, Alexandru Mihaila, Razvan Marian Costache, Carmen Anca Colosi, Ioana Alina Junie, Lia Monica Easy and Affordable: A New Method for the Studying of Bacterial Biofilm Formation |
title | Easy and Affordable: A New Method for the Studying of Bacterial Biofilm Formation |
title_full | Easy and Affordable: A New Method for the Studying of Bacterial Biofilm Formation |
title_fullStr | Easy and Affordable: A New Method for the Studying of Bacterial Biofilm Formation |
title_full_unstemmed | Easy and Affordable: A New Method for the Studying of Bacterial Biofilm Formation |
title_short | Easy and Affordable: A New Method for the Studying of Bacterial Biofilm Formation |
title_sort | easy and affordable: a new method for the studying of bacterial biofilm formation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36552883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11244119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tocdanalexandru easyandaffordableanewmethodforthestudyingofbacterialbiofilmformation AT csapaialexandra easyandaffordableanewmethodforthestudyingofbacterialbiofilmformation AT popaflorin easyandaffordableanewmethodforthestudyingofbacterialbiofilmformation AT popacatalin easyandaffordableanewmethodforthestudyingofbacterialbiofilmformation AT pascalauvioleta easyandaffordableanewmethodforthestudyingofbacterialbiofilmformation AT tosanicoleta easyandaffordableanewmethodforthestudyingofbacterialbiofilmformation AT botanalexandru easyandaffordableanewmethodforthestudyingofbacterialbiofilmformation AT mihailarazvanmarian easyandaffordableanewmethodforthestudyingofbacterialbiofilmformation AT costachecarmenanca easyandaffordableanewmethodforthestudyingofbacterialbiofilmformation AT colosiioanaalina easyandaffordableanewmethodforthestudyingofbacterialbiofilmformation AT junieliamonica easyandaffordableanewmethodforthestudyingofbacterialbiofilmformation |