Cargando…

An Innovative Biomedical Research Training Model: Rationale, Design, and Evaluation

Much is told regarding the need for greater diversity in the biomedical research workforce in terms of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. However, there are few evidence-based models that are tested and can have significant effects in this regard. Thus, there is a need for development and ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheikhattari, Payam, Mehravaran, Shiva, Apata, Jummai, Silver, Gillian, Murphy, Shamara, Hurtado, Sylvia, Kamangar, Farin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36547024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe12120123
_version_ 1784856104839151616
author Sheikhattari, Payam
Mehravaran, Shiva
Apata, Jummai
Silver, Gillian
Murphy, Shamara
Hurtado, Sylvia
Kamangar, Farin
author_facet Sheikhattari, Payam
Mehravaran, Shiva
Apata, Jummai
Silver, Gillian
Murphy, Shamara
Hurtado, Sylvia
Kamangar, Farin
author_sort Sheikhattari, Payam
collection PubMed
description Much is told regarding the need for greater diversity in the biomedical research workforce in terms of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. However, there are few evidence-based models that are tested and can have significant effects in this regard. Thus, there is a need for development and evaluation of innovative models that may help train a more diverse biomedical research workforce. In this study, we provided the rationale, conceptual model, and preliminary evaluation of a program called “A Student-Centered Entrepreneurship Development (ASCEND)”. This training program was designed, implemented, and evaluated between 2017 and 2020 at Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States. The program’s conceptual model is based on four stages: Attraction and Inspiration, Ideation and Innovation, Research Implementation, and Career Growth. Results of the comparative survey between 50 students who participated in ASCEND and 86 non-member controls showed an increase in science identity, academic self-concept, science self-efficacy, and peer support. The only domain that did not show a larger increase in participants in our program compared to controls was social self-concept. In addition, a total of 59 students submitted 48 research concepts, and 16 undergraduate student projects were funded. Of participants in the Health Research Concepts Competition, 39 students graduated, and 13 were pursuing graduate programs in STEM fields at the time of evaluation. The number of research projects and trainees who started a graduate degree were also reported. The ASCEND training model fosters an entrepreneurial mindset among undergraduate students. Such a program might be effective in diversifying the biomedical research workforce. While this preliminary evaluation indicates the efficacy of the ASCEND model, there is a need for further long-term and multi-center evaluations with the trainees’ research productivity and receipt of independent funding as outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9777441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97774412022-12-23 An Innovative Biomedical Research Training Model: Rationale, Design, and Evaluation Sheikhattari, Payam Mehravaran, Shiva Apata, Jummai Silver, Gillian Murphy, Shamara Hurtado, Sylvia Kamangar, Farin Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ Article Much is told regarding the need for greater diversity in the biomedical research workforce in terms of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. However, there are few evidence-based models that are tested and can have significant effects in this regard. Thus, there is a need for development and evaluation of innovative models that may help train a more diverse biomedical research workforce. In this study, we provided the rationale, conceptual model, and preliminary evaluation of a program called “A Student-Centered Entrepreneurship Development (ASCEND)”. This training program was designed, implemented, and evaluated between 2017 and 2020 at Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States. The program’s conceptual model is based on four stages: Attraction and Inspiration, Ideation and Innovation, Research Implementation, and Career Growth. Results of the comparative survey between 50 students who participated in ASCEND and 86 non-member controls showed an increase in science identity, academic self-concept, science self-efficacy, and peer support. The only domain that did not show a larger increase in participants in our program compared to controls was social self-concept. In addition, a total of 59 students submitted 48 research concepts, and 16 undergraduate student projects were funded. Of participants in the Health Research Concepts Competition, 39 students graduated, and 13 were pursuing graduate programs in STEM fields at the time of evaluation. The number of research projects and trainees who started a graduate degree were also reported. The ASCEND training model fosters an entrepreneurial mindset among undergraduate students. Such a program might be effective in diversifying the biomedical research workforce. While this preliminary evaluation indicates the efficacy of the ASCEND model, there is a need for further long-term and multi-center evaluations with the trainees’ research productivity and receipt of independent funding as outcomes. MDPI 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9777441/ /pubmed/36547024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe12120123 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sheikhattari, Payam
Mehravaran, Shiva
Apata, Jummai
Silver, Gillian
Murphy, Shamara
Hurtado, Sylvia
Kamangar, Farin
An Innovative Biomedical Research Training Model: Rationale, Design, and Evaluation
title An Innovative Biomedical Research Training Model: Rationale, Design, and Evaluation
title_full An Innovative Biomedical Research Training Model: Rationale, Design, and Evaluation
title_fullStr An Innovative Biomedical Research Training Model: Rationale, Design, and Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed An Innovative Biomedical Research Training Model: Rationale, Design, and Evaluation
title_short An Innovative Biomedical Research Training Model: Rationale, Design, and Evaluation
title_sort innovative biomedical research training model: rationale, design, and evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36547024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe12120123
work_keys_str_mv AT sheikhattaripayam aninnovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT mehravaranshiva aninnovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT apatajummai aninnovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT silvergillian aninnovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT murphyshamara aninnovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT hurtadosylvia aninnovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT kamangarfarin aninnovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT sheikhattaripayam innovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT mehravaranshiva innovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT apatajummai innovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT silvergillian innovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT murphyshamara innovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT hurtadosylvia innovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation
AT kamangarfarin innovativebiomedicalresearchtrainingmodelrationaledesignandevaluation