Cargando…
Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes before and during a Diabetes Camp—A Ceiling Effect?
Background: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the time in range (TIR) of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) before and during a diabetes summer camp using different therapy modalities. Methods: A retrospective analysis of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data collected from 26 chil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9121951 |
_version_ | 1784856124149727232 |
---|---|
author | Nagl, Katrin Bozic, Ina Berger, Gabriele Tauschmann, Martin Blauensteiner, Nicole Weimann, Katharina Mader, Julia K. Rami-Merhar, Birgit |
author_facet | Nagl, Katrin Bozic, Ina Berger, Gabriele Tauschmann, Martin Blauensteiner, Nicole Weimann, Katharina Mader, Julia K. Rami-Merhar, Birgit |
author_sort | Nagl, Katrin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the time in range (TIR) of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) before and during a diabetes summer camp using different therapy modalities. Methods: A retrospective analysis of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data collected from 26 children with T1D (mean age: 11.0 ± 1.4 years; 62% female; 62% on insulin pump; Hb1Ac 7.3 ± 0.8% (56.3 ± 8.7 mmol/mol) before and during a 14-day summer camp. CGM methods: 50% intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) and 50% real-time CGM (rtCGM). No child was using a hybrid closed loop system. Results: Mean TIR during camp was significantly higher than before camp ((67.0 ± 10.7%) vs. 58.2% ± 17.4%, p = 0.004). There was a significant reduction in time above range (TAR) (p = 0.001) and increase in time below range (TBR) (p < 0.001), Children using isCGM showed a more pronounced improvement in TIR during camp compared to rtCGM-users (p = 0.025). The increase in TIR strongly correlated with numbers of scans per day in isCGM-users (r = 0.751, p = 0.003). Compared to isCGM-users, rtCGM-users showed significantly less TBR. The TIR target was met by 30.8% of participants during camp. Conclusion: Glycemic control improved significantly during the camp. However, on average, the therapy goal (TIR > 70%) could not be achieved despite great professional effort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9777517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97775172022-12-23 Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes before and during a Diabetes Camp—A Ceiling Effect? Nagl, Katrin Bozic, Ina Berger, Gabriele Tauschmann, Martin Blauensteiner, Nicole Weimann, Katharina Mader, Julia K. Rami-Merhar, Birgit Children (Basel) Article Background: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the time in range (TIR) of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) before and during a diabetes summer camp using different therapy modalities. Methods: A retrospective analysis of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data collected from 26 children with T1D (mean age: 11.0 ± 1.4 years; 62% female; 62% on insulin pump; Hb1Ac 7.3 ± 0.8% (56.3 ± 8.7 mmol/mol) before and during a 14-day summer camp. CGM methods: 50% intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) and 50% real-time CGM (rtCGM). No child was using a hybrid closed loop system. Results: Mean TIR during camp was significantly higher than before camp ((67.0 ± 10.7%) vs. 58.2% ± 17.4%, p = 0.004). There was a significant reduction in time above range (TAR) (p = 0.001) and increase in time below range (TBR) (p < 0.001), Children using isCGM showed a more pronounced improvement in TIR during camp compared to rtCGM-users (p = 0.025). The increase in TIR strongly correlated with numbers of scans per day in isCGM-users (r = 0.751, p = 0.003). Compared to isCGM-users, rtCGM-users showed significantly less TBR. The TIR target was met by 30.8% of participants during camp. Conclusion: Glycemic control improved significantly during the camp. However, on average, the therapy goal (TIR > 70%) could not be achieved despite great professional effort. MDPI 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9777517/ /pubmed/36553394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9121951 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nagl, Katrin Bozic, Ina Berger, Gabriele Tauschmann, Martin Blauensteiner, Nicole Weimann, Katharina Mader, Julia K. Rami-Merhar, Birgit Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes before and during a Diabetes Camp—A Ceiling Effect? |
title | Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes before and during a Diabetes Camp—A Ceiling Effect? |
title_full | Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes before and during a Diabetes Camp—A Ceiling Effect? |
title_fullStr | Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes before and during a Diabetes Camp—A Ceiling Effect? |
title_full_unstemmed | Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes before and during a Diabetes Camp—A Ceiling Effect? |
title_short | Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes before and during a Diabetes Camp—A Ceiling Effect? |
title_sort | time in range in children with type 1 diabetes before and during a diabetes camp—a ceiling effect? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9121951 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naglkatrin timeinrangeinchildrenwithtype1diabetesbeforeandduringadiabetescampaceilingeffect AT bozicina timeinrangeinchildrenwithtype1diabetesbeforeandduringadiabetescampaceilingeffect AT bergergabriele timeinrangeinchildrenwithtype1diabetesbeforeandduringadiabetescampaceilingeffect AT tauschmannmartin timeinrangeinchildrenwithtype1diabetesbeforeandduringadiabetescampaceilingeffect AT blauensteinernicole timeinrangeinchildrenwithtype1diabetesbeforeandduringadiabetescampaceilingeffect AT weimannkatharina timeinrangeinchildrenwithtype1diabetesbeforeandduringadiabetescampaceilingeffect AT maderjuliak timeinrangeinchildrenwithtype1diabetesbeforeandduringadiabetescampaceilingeffect AT ramimerharbirgit timeinrangeinchildrenwithtype1diabetesbeforeandduringadiabetescampaceilingeffect |