Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of AI for Opportunistic Screening of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in CT: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

In this review, we focused on the applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) for opportunistic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) detection in computed tomography (CT). We used the academic search system PubMed as the primary source for the literature search and Google Scholar as a supplementary sou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kodenko, Maria R., Vasilev, Yuriy A., Vladzymyrskyy, Anton V., Omelyanskaya, Olga V., Leonov, Denis V., Blokhin, Ivan A., Novik, Vladimir P., Kulberg, Nicholas S., Samorodov, Andrey V., Mokienko, Olesya A., Reshetnikov, Roman V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553204
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123197
_version_ 1784856134933282816
author Kodenko, Maria R.
Vasilev, Yuriy A.
Vladzymyrskyy, Anton V.
Omelyanskaya, Olga V.
Leonov, Denis V.
Blokhin, Ivan A.
Novik, Vladimir P.
Kulberg, Nicholas S.
Samorodov, Andrey V.
Mokienko, Olesya A.
Reshetnikov, Roman V.
author_facet Kodenko, Maria R.
Vasilev, Yuriy A.
Vladzymyrskyy, Anton V.
Omelyanskaya, Olga V.
Leonov, Denis V.
Blokhin, Ivan A.
Novik, Vladimir P.
Kulberg, Nicholas S.
Samorodov, Andrey V.
Mokienko, Olesya A.
Reshetnikov, Roman V.
author_sort Kodenko, Maria R.
collection PubMed
description In this review, we focused on the applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) for opportunistic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) detection in computed tomography (CT). We used the academic search system PubMed as the primary source for the literature search and Google Scholar as a supplementary source of evidence. We searched through 2 February 2022. All studies on automated AAA detection or segmentation in noncontrast abdominal CT were included. For bias assessment, we developed and used an adapted version of the QUADAS-2 checklist. We included eight studies with 355 cases, of which 273 (77%) contained AAA. The highest risk of bias and level of applicability concerns were observed for the “patient selection” domain, due to the 100% pathology rate in the majority (75%) of the studies. The mean sensitivity value was 95% (95% CI 100–87%), the mean specificity value was 96.6% (95% CI 100–75.7%), and the mean accuracy value was 95.2% (95% CI 100–54.5%). Half of the included studies performed diagnostic accuracy estimation, with only one study having data on all diagnostic accuracy metrics. Therefore, we conducted a narrative synthesis. Our findings indicate high study heterogeneity, requiring further research with balanced noncontrast CT datasets and adherence to reporting standards in order to validate the high sensitivity value obtained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9777560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97775602022-12-23 Diagnostic Accuracy of AI for Opportunistic Screening of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in CT: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis Kodenko, Maria R. Vasilev, Yuriy A. Vladzymyrskyy, Anton V. Omelyanskaya, Olga V. Leonov, Denis V. Blokhin, Ivan A. Novik, Vladimir P. Kulberg, Nicholas S. Samorodov, Andrey V. Mokienko, Olesya A. Reshetnikov, Roman V. Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review In this review, we focused on the applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) for opportunistic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) detection in computed tomography (CT). We used the academic search system PubMed as the primary source for the literature search and Google Scholar as a supplementary source of evidence. We searched through 2 February 2022. All studies on automated AAA detection or segmentation in noncontrast abdominal CT were included. For bias assessment, we developed and used an adapted version of the QUADAS-2 checklist. We included eight studies with 355 cases, of which 273 (77%) contained AAA. The highest risk of bias and level of applicability concerns were observed for the “patient selection” domain, due to the 100% pathology rate in the majority (75%) of the studies. The mean sensitivity value was 95% (95% CI 100–87%), the mean specificity value was 96.6% (95% CI 100–75.7%), and the mean accuracy value was 95.2% (95% CI 100–54.5%). Half of the included studies performed diagnostic accuracy estimation, with only one study having data on all diagnostic accuracy metrics. Therefore, we conducted a narrative synthesis. Our findings indicate high study heterogeneity, requiring further research with balanced noncontrast CT datasets and adherence to reporting standards in order to validate the high sensitivity value obtained. MDPI 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9777560/ /pubmed/36553204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123197 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Kodenko, Maria R.
Vasilev, Yuriy A.
Vladzymyrskyy, Anton V.
Omelyanskaya, Olga V.
Leonov, Denis V.
Blokhin, Ivan A.
Novik, Vladimir P.
Kulberg, Nicholas S.
Samorodov, Andrey V.
Mokienko, Olesya A.
Reshetnikov, Roman V.
Diagnostic Accuracy of AI for Opportunistic Screening of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in CT: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis
title Diagnostic Accuracy of AI for Opportunistic Screening of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in CT: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of AI for Opportunistic Screening of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in CT: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of AI for Opportunistic Screening of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in CT: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of AI for Opportunistic Screening of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in CT: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of AI for Opportunistic Screening of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in CT: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of ai for opportunistic screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm in ct: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553204
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123197
work_keys_str_mv AT kodenkomariar diagnosticaccuracyofaiforopportunisticscreeningofabdominalaorticaneurysminctasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT vasilevyuriya diagnosticaccuracyofaiforopportunisticscreeningofabdominalaorticaneurysminctasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT vladzymyrskyyantonv diagnosticaccuracyofaiforopportunisticscreeningofabdominalaorticaneurysminctasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT omelyanskayaolgav diagnosticaccuracyofaiforopportunisticscreeningofabdominalaorticaneurysminctasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT leonovdenisv diagnosticaccuracyofaiforopportunisticscreeningofabdominalaorticaneurysminctasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT blokhinivana diagnosticaccuracyofaiforopportunisticscreeningofabdominalaorticaneurysminctasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT novikvladimirp diagnosticaccuracyofaiforopportunisticscreeningofabdominalaorticaneurysminctasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT kulbergnicholass diagnosticaccuracyofaiforopportunisticscreeningofabdominalaorticaneurysminctasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT samorodovandreyv diagnosticaccuracyofaiforopportunisticscreeningofabdominalaorticaneurysminctasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT mokienkoolesyaa diagnosticaccuracyofaiforopportunisticscreeningofabdominalaorticaneurysminctasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT reshetnikovromanv diagnosticaccuracyofaiforopportunisticscreeningofabdominalaorticaneurysminctasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis