Cargando…

Topics Mentioned by Stroke Patients during Supportive Phone Calls—Implications for Individualized Aftercare Programs

By understanding stroke as a chronic disease, aftercare becomes increasingly important. For developing aftercare programs, the patients’ perspective regarding, for example, stroke-related symptoms and interactions with the healthcare system is necessary. Records from a local stroke pilot program wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidt, Richard, Geisler, Daniela, Urban, Daniela, Wagner, Markus, Ivanova, Galina, Neumuth, Thomas, Classen, Joseph, Michalski, Dominik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122394
_version_ 1784856140466618368
author Schmidt, Richard
Geisler, Daniela
Urban, Daniela
Wagner, Markus
Ivanova, Galina
Neumuth, Thomas
Classen, Joseph
Michalski, Dominik
author_facet Schmidt, Richard
Geisler, Daniela
Urban, Daniela
Wagner, Markus
Ivanova, Galina
Neumuth, Thomas
Classen, Joseph
Michalski, Dominik
author_sort Schmidt, Richard
collection PubMed
description By understanding stroke as a chronic disease, aftercare becomes increasingly important. For developing aftercare programs, the patients’ perspective regarding, for example, stroke-related symptoms and interactions with the healthcare system is necessary. Records from a local stroke pilot program were used to extract relevant topics from the patients’ perspective, as mentioned during a phone call two months after hospital discharge. Data from 157 patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) were included. “Rehabilitation” was mentioned by 67.5% of patients, followed by “specialist physician”, “symptoms”, and “medication”. Compared with severely disabled patients, those with no relevant disability at hospital discharge mentioned “symptoms” significantly more often. Regarding rehabilitation, “outpatient care” was mentioned more often by patients in an inpatient setting, and 11.8% without rehabilitation mentioned “depression”. Patients in single-compared to multi-person households differed, for example, in the frequency of mentioning “specialist physicians” and gradually “outpatient care”. A multivariate model yielded associations between the disability at discharge and the probability of mentioning relevant topics afterward. This study provided insights into the patients’ perspective and identified topics that need attention while accompanying stroke and TIA patients after discharge. Further, the degree of disability at discharge might be helpful for planning individual aftercare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9777582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97775822022-12-23 Topics Mentioned by Stroke Patients during Supportive Phone Calls—Implications for Individualized Aftercare Programs Schmidt, Richard Geisler, Daniela Urban, Daniela Wagner, Markus Ivanova, Galina Neumuth, Thomas Classen, Joseph Michalski, Dominik Healthcare (Basel) Article By understanding stroke as a chronic disease, aftercare becomes increasingly important. For developing aftercare programs, the patients’ perspective regarding, for example, stroke-related symptoms and interactions with the healthcare system is necessary. Records from a local stroke pilot program were used to extract relevant topics from the patients’ perspective, as mentioned during a phone call two months after hospital discharge. Data from 157 patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) were included. “Rehabilitation” was mentioned by 67.5% of patients, followed by “specialist physician”, “symptoms”, and “medication”. Compared with severely disabled patients, those with no relevant disability at hospital discharge mentioned “symptoms” significantly more often. Regarding rehabilitation, “outpatient care” was mentioned more often by patients in an inpatient setting, and 11.8% without rehabilitation mentioned “depression”. Patients in single-compared to multi-person households differed, for example, in the frequency of mentioning “specialist physicians” and gradually “outpatient care”. A multivariate model yielded associations between the disability at discharge and the probability of mentioning relevant topics afterward. This study provided insights into the patients’ perspective and identified topics that need attention while accompanying stroke and TIA patients after discharge. Further, the degree of disability at discharge might be helpful for planning individual aftercare. MDPI 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9777582/ /pubmed/36553918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122394 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schmidt, Richard
Geisler, Daniela
Urban, Daniela
Wagner, Markus
Ivanova, Galina
Neumuth, Thomas
Classen, Joseph
Michalski, Dominik
Topics Mentioned by Stroke Patients during Supportive Phone Calls—Implications for Individualized Aftercare Programs
title Topics Mentioned by Stroke Patients during Supportive Phone Calls—Implications for Individualized Aftercare Programs
title_full Topics Mentioned by Stroke Patients during Supportive Phone Calls—Implications for Individualized Aftercare Programs
title_fullStr Topics Mentioned by Stroke Patients during Supportive Phone Calls—Implications for Individualized Aftercare Programs
title_full_unstemmed Topics Mentioned by Stroke Patients during Supportive Phone Calls—Implications for Individualized Aftercare Programs
title_short Topics Mentioned by Stroke Patients during Supportive Phone Calls—Implications for Individualized Aftercare Programs
title_sort topics mentioned by stroke patients during supportive phone calls—implications for individualized aftercare programs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9777582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122394
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidtrichard topicsmentionedbystrokepatientsduringsupportivephonecallsimplicationsforindividualizedaftercareprograms
AT geislerdaniela topicsmentionedbystrokepatientsduringsupportivephonecallsimplicationsforindividualizedaftercareprograms
AT urbandaniela topicsmentionedbystrokepatientsduringsupportivephonecallsimplicationsforindividualizedaftercareprograms
AT wagnermarkus topicsmentionedbystrokepatientsduringsupportivephonecallsimplicationsforindividualizedaftercareprograms
AT ivanovagalina topicsmentionedbystrokepatientsduringsupportivephonecallsimplicationsforindividualizedaftercareprograms
AT neumuththomas topicsmentionedbystrokepatientsduringsupportivephonecallsimplicationsforindividualizedaftercareprograms
AT classenjoseph topicsmentionedbystrokepatientsduringsupportivephonecallsimplicationsforindividualizedaftercareprograms
AT michalskidominik topicsmentionedbystrokepatientsduringsupportivephonecallsimplicationsforindividualizedaftercareprograms