Cargando…
A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastasis. Liver surgery is a cornerstone in treatment, with progressive expansion of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of open surgery and MIS for the treatment of colorectal adenocarcin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122433 |
_version_ | 1784856288528695296 |
---|---|
author | Bartolini, Ilenia Fortuna, Laura Risaliti, Matteo Tirloni, Luca Buccianti, Simone Luceri, Cristina Ringressi, Maria Novella Batignani, Giacomo Taddei, Antonio |
author_facet | Bartolini, Ilenia Fortuna, Laura Risaliti, Matteo Tirloni, Luca Buccianti, Simone Luceri, Cristina Ringressi, Maria Novella Batignani, Giacomo Taddei, Antonio |
author_sort | Bartolini, Ilenia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastasis. Liver surgery is a cornerstone in treatment, with progressive expansion of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of open surgery and MIS for the treatment of colorectal adenocarcinoma liver metastasis during the first three years of increasing caseload and implementation of MIS use in liver surgery. All patients treated between November 2018 and August 2021 at Careggi Teaching Hospital in Florence, Italy, were prospectively entered into a database and retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-one patients were resected (41 open, 10 MIS). Considering that patients with a significantly higher number of lesions underwent open surgery and operative results were similar, postoperative morbidity rate and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the open group. No differences were found in the pathological specimen. The postoperative mortality rate was 2%. Mean overall survival and disease-free survival were 46 months (95% CI 42–50) and 22 months (95% CI 15.6–29), respectively. The use of minimally invasive techniques in liver surgery is safe and feasible if surgeons have adequate expertise. MIS and parenchymal sparing resections should be preferred whenever technically feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9778157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97781572022-12-23 A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis Bartolini, Ilenia Fortuna, Laura Risaliti, Matteo Tirloni, Luca Buccianti, Simone Luceri, Cristina Ringressi, Maria Novella Batignani, Giacomo Taddei, Antonio Healthcare (Basel) Article The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastasis. Liver surgery is a cornerstone in treatment, with progressive expansion of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of open surgery and MIS for the treatment of colorectal adenocarcinoma liver metastasis during the first three years of increasing caseload and implementation of MIS use in liver surgery. All patients treated between November 2018 and August 2021 at Careggi Teaching Hospital in Florence, Italy, were prospectively entered into a database and retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-one patients were resected (41 open, 10 MIS). Considering that patients with a significantly higher number of lesions underwent open surgery and operative results were similar, postoperative morbidity rate and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the open group. No differences were found in the pathological specimen. The postoperative mortality rate was 2%. Mean overall survival and disease-free survival were 46 months (95% CI 42–50) and 22 months (95% CI 15.6–29), respectively. The use of minimally invasive techniques in liver surgery is safe and feasible if surgeons have adequate expertise. MIS and parenchymal sparing resections should be preferred whenever technically feasible. MDPI 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9778157/ /pubmed/36553957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122433 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bartolini, Ilenia Fortuna, Laura Risaliti, Matteo Tirloni, Luca Buccianti, Simone Luceri, Cristina Ringressi, Maria Novella Batignani, Giacomo Taddei, Antonio A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis |
title | A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis |
title_full | A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis |
title_fullStr | A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis |
title_short | A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis |
title_sort | comparison between open and minimally invasive techniques for the resection of colorectal liver metastasis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartoliniilenia acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT fortunalaura acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT risalitimatteo acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT tirloniluca acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT bucciantisimone acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT lucericristina acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT ringressimarianovella acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT batignanigiacomo acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT taddeiantonio acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT bartoliniilenia comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT fortunalaura comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT risalitimatteo comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT tirloniluca comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT bucciantisimone comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT lucericristina comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT ringressimarianovella comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT batignanigiacomo comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis AT taddeiantonio comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis |