Cargando…

A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis

The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastasis. Liver surgery is a cornerstone in treatment, with progressive expansion of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of open surgery and MIS for the treatment of colorectal adenocarcin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartolini, Ilenia, Fortuna, Laura, Risaliti, Matteo, Tirloni, Luca, Buccianti, Simone, Luceri, Cristina, Ringressi, Maria Novella, Batignani, Giacomo, Taddei, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122433
_version_ 1784856288528695296
author Bartolini, Ilenia
Fortuna, Laura
Risaliti, Matteo
Tirloni, Luca
Buccianti, Simone
Luceri, Cristina
Ringressi, Maria Novella
Batignani, Giacomo
Taddei, Antonio
author_facet Bartolini, Ilenia
Fortuna, Laura
Risaliti, Matteo
Tirloni, Luca
Buccianti, Simone
Luceri, Cristina
Ringressi, Maria Novella
Batignani, Giacomo
Taddei, Antonio
author_sort Bartolini, Ilenia
collection PubMed
description The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastasis. Liver surgery is a cornerstone in treatment, with progressive expansion of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of open surgery and MIS for the treatment of colorectal adenocarcinoma liver metastasis during the first three years of increasing caseload and implementation of MIS use in liver surgery. All patients treated between November 2018 and August 2021 at Careggi Teaching Hospital in Florence, Italy, were prospectively entered into a database and retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-one patients were resected (41 open, 10 MIS). Considering that patients with a significantly higher number of lesions underwent open surgery and operative results were similar, postoperative morbidity rate and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the open group. No differences were found in the pathological specimen. The postoperative mortality rate was 2%. Mean overall survival and disease-free survival were 46 months (95% CI 42–50) and 22 months (95% CI 15.6–29), respectively. The use of minimally invasive techniques in liver surgery is safe and feasible if surgeons have adequate expertise. MIS and parenchymal sparing resections should be preferred whenever technically feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9778157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97781572022-12-23 A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis Bartolini, Ilenia Fortuna, Laura Risaliti, Matteo Tirloni, Luca Buccianti, Simone Luceri, Cristina Ringressi, Maria Novella Batignani, Giacomo Taddei, Antonio Healthcare (Basel) Article The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastasis. Liver surgery is a cornerstone in treatment, with progressive expansion of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of open surgery and MIS for the treatment of colorectal adenocarcinoma liver metastasis during the first three years of increasing caseload and implementation of MIS use in liver surgery. All patients treated between November 2018 and August 2021 at Careggi Teaching Hospital in Florence, Italy, were prospectively entered into a database and retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-one patients were resected (41 open, 10 MIS). Considering that patients with a significantly higher number of lesions underwent open surgery and operative results were similar, postoperative morbidity rate and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the open group. No differences were found in the pathological specimen. The postoperative mortality rate was 2%. Mean overall survival and disease-free survival were 46 months (95% CI 42–50) and 22 months (95% CI 15.6–29), respectively. The use of minimally invasive techniques in liver surgery is safe and feasible if surgeons have adequate expertise. MIS and parenchymal sparing resections should be preferred whenever technically feasible. MDPI 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9778157/ /pubmed/36553957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122433 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bartolini, Ilenia
Fortuna, Laura
Risaliti, Matteo
Tirloni, Luca
Buccianti, Simone
Luceri, Cristina
Ringressi, Maria Novella
Batignani, Giacomo
Taddei, Antonio
A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
title A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
title_full A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
title_fullStr A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
title_short A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
title_sort comparison between open and minimally invasive techniques for the resection of colorectal liver metastasis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122433
work_keys_str_mv AT bartoliniilenia acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT fortunalaura acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT risalitimatteo acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT tirloniluca acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT bucciantisimone acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT lucericristina acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT ringressimarianovella acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT batignanigiacomo acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT taddeiantonio acomparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT bartoliniilenia comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT fortunalaura comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT risalitimatteo comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT tirloniluca comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT bucciantisimone comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT lucericristina comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT ringressimarianovella comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT batignanigiacomo comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis
AT taddeiantonio comparisonbetweenopenandminimallyinvasivetechniquesfortheresectionofcolorectallivermetastasis