Cargando…
Routine Diagnostics Confirm Novel Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Routine diagnostics is biased towards genes and variants with satisfactory evidence, but rare disorders with only little confirmation of their pathogenicity might be missed. Many of these genes can, however, be considered relevant, although they may have less evidence because they lack OMIM entries...
Autores principales: | Jauss, Robin-Tobias, Schließke, Sophia, Abou Jamra, Rami |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36553572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13122305 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Approach to Cohort-Wide Re-Analysis of Exome Data in 1000 Individuals with Neurodevelopmental Disorders
por: Halfmeyer, Insa, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Exome first approach to reduce diagnostic costs and time – retrospective analysis of 111 individuals with rare neurodevelopmental disorders
por: Klau, Julia, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Heterozygous and homozygous variants in STX1A cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with or without epilepsy
por: Luppe, Johannes, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Re-evaluation and re-analysis of 152 research exomes five years after the initial report reveals clinically relevant changes in 18%
por: Bartolomaeus, Tobias, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The diagnostic journey of genetically defined neurodevelopmental disorders
por: Simon, Juliana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)