Cargando…
A Bibliometric Analysis of Wearable Device Research Trends 2001–2022—A Study on the Reversal of Number of Publications and Research Trends in China and the USA
In recent years, Wearable Devices have been used in a wide variety of applications and fields, but because they span so many different disciplines, it is difficult to ascertain the intellectual structure of this entire research domain. No review encompasses the whole research domain related to Weara...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554307 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416427 |
_version_ | 1784856468223164416 |
---|---|
author | Kageyama, Itsuki Kurata, Karin Miyashita, Shuto Lim, Yeongjoo Sengoku, Shintaro Kodama, Kota |
author_facet | Kageyama, Itsuki Kurata, Karin Miyashita, Shuto Lim, Yeongjoo Sengoku, Shintaro Kodama, Kota |
author_sort | Kageyama, Itsuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, Wearable Devices have been used in a wide variety of applications and fields, but because they span so many different disciplines, it is difficult to ascertain the intellectual structure of this entire research domain. No review encompasses the whole research domain related to Wearable Devices. In this study, we collected articles on wearable devices from 2001 to 2022 and quantitatively organized them by bibliometric analysis to clarify the intellectual structure of this research domain as a whole. The cluster analysis, co-occurrence analysis, and network centrality analysis were conducted on articles collected from the Web of Science. As a result, we identified one cluster that represents applied research and two clusters that represent basic research in this research domain. Furthermore, focusing on the top two countries contributing to this research domain, China and the USA., it was confirmed that China is extremely inclined toward basic research and the USA. toward applied research, indicating that applied and basic research are in balance. The basic intellectual structure of this cross-sectional research domain was identified. The results summarize the current state of research related to Wearable Devices and provide insight into trends. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9778864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97788642022-12-23 A Bibliometric Analysis of Wearable Device Research Trends 2001–2022—A Study on the Reversal of Number of Publications and Research Trends in China and the USA Kageyama, Itsuki Kurata, Karin Miyashita, Shuto Lim, Yeongjoo Sengoku, Shintaro Kodama, Kota Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In recent years, Wearable Devices have been used in a wide variety of applications and fields, but because they span so many different disciplines, it is difficult to ascertain the intellectual structure of this entire research domain. No review encompasses the whole research domain related to Wearable Devices. In this study, we collected articles on wearable devices from 2001 to 2022 and quantitatively organized them by bibliometric analysis to clarify the intellectual structure of this research domain as a whole. The cluster analysis, co-occurrence analysis, and network centrality analysis were conducted on articles collected from the Web of Science. As a result, we identified one cluster that represents applied research and two clusters that represent basic research in this research domain. Furthermore, focusing on the top two countries contributing to this research domain, China and the USA., it was confirmed that China is extremely inclined toward basic research and the USA. toward applied research, indicating that applied and basic research are in balance. The basic intellectual structure of this cross-sectional research domain was identified. The results summarize the current state of research related to Wearable Devices and provide insight into trends. MDPI 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9778864/ /pubmed/36554307 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416427 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kageyama, Itsuki Kurata, Karin Miyashita, Shuto Lim, Yeongjoo Sengoku, Shintaro Kodama, Kota A Bibliometric Analysis of Wearable Device Research Trends 2001–2022—A Study on the Reversal of Number of Publications and Research Trends in China and the USA |
title | A Bibliometric Analysis of Wearable Device Research Trends 2001–2022—A Study on the Reversal of Number of Publications and Research Trends in China and the USA |
title_full | A Bibliometric Analysis of Wearable Device Research Trends 2001–2022—A Study on the Reversal of Number of Publications and Research Trends in China and the USA |
title_fullStr | A Bibliometric Analysis of Wearable Device Research Trends 2001–2022—A Study on the Reversal of Number of Publications and Research Trends in China and the USA |
title_full_unstemmed | A Bibliometric Analysis of Wearable Device Research Trends 2001–2022—A Study on the Reversal of Number of Publications and Research Trends in China and the USA |
title_short | A Bibliometric Analysis of Wearable Device Research Trends 2001–2022—A Study on the Reversal of Number of Publications and Research Trends in China and the USA |
title_sort | bibliometric analysis of wearable device research trends 2001–2022—a study on the reversal of number of publications and research trends in china and the usa |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554307 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416427 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kageyamaitsuki abibliometricanalysisofwearabledeviceresearchtrends20012022astudyonthereversalofnumberofpublicationsandresearchtrendsinchinaandtheusa AT kuratakarin abibliometricanalysisofwearabledeviceresearchtrends20012022astudyonthereversalofnumberofpublicationsandresearchtrendsinchinaandtheusa AT miyashitashuto abibliometricanalysisofwearabledeviceresearchtrends20012022astudyonthereversalofnumberofpublicationsandresearchtrendsinchinaandtheusa AT limyeongjoo abibliometricanalysisofwearabledeviceresearchtrends20012022astudyonthereversalofnumberofpublicationsandresearchtrendsinchinaandtheusa AT sengokushintaro abibliometricanalysisofwearabledeviceresearchtrends20012022astudyonthereversalofnumberofpublicationsandresearchtrendsinchinaandtheusa AT kodamakota abibliometricanalysisofwearabledeviceresearchtrends20012022astudyonthereversalofnumberofpublicationsandresearchtrendsinchinaandtheusa AT kageyamaitsuki bibliometricanalysisofwearabledeviceresearchtrends20012022astudyonthereversalofnumberofpublicationsandresearchtrendsinchinaandtheusa AT kuratakarin bibliometricanalysisofwearabledeviceresearchtrends20012022astudyonthereversalofnumberofpublicationsandresearchtrendsinchinaandtheusa AT miyashitashuto bibliometricanalysisofwearabledeviceresearchtrends20012022astudyonthereversalofnumberofpublicationsandresearchtrendsinchinaandtheusa AT limyeongjoo bibliometricanalysisofwearabledeviceresearchtrends20012022astudyonthereversalofnumberofpublicationsandresearchtrendsinchinaandtheusa AT sengokushintaro bibliometricanalysisofwearabledeviceresearchtrends20012022astudyonthereversalofnumberofpublicationsandresearchtrendsinchinaandtheusa AT kodamakota bibliometricanalysisofwearabledeviceresearchtrends20012022astudyonthereversalofnumberofpublicationsandresearchtrendsinchinaandtheusa |