Cargando…

Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction

During submaximal isometric contraction, there are two different load types: maintenance of a constant limb angle while supporting an inertial load (position task) and maintenance of a constant force by pushing against a rigid restraint (force task). Previous studies demonstrated that performing the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yunoki, Keisuke, Watanabe, Tatsunori, Matsumoto, Takuya, Kuwabara, Takayuki, Horinouchi, Takayuki, Ito, Kanami, Ishida, Haruki, Kirimoto, Hikari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279477
_version_ 1784856500703854592
author Yunoki, Keisuke
Watanabe, Tatsunori
Matsumoto, Takuya
Kuwabara, Takayuki
Horinouchi, Takayuki
Ito, Kanami
Ishida, Haruki
Kirimoto, Hikari
author_facet Yunoki, Keisuke
Watanabe, Tatsunori
Matsumoto, Takuya
Kuwabara, Takayuki
Horinouchi, Takayuki
Ito, Kanami
Ishida, Haruki
Kirimoto, Hikari
author_sort Yunoki, Keisuke
collection PubMed
description During submaximal isometric contraction, there are two different load types: maintenance of a constant limb angle while supporting an inertial load (position task) and maintenance of a constant force by pushing against a rigid restraint (force task). Previous studies demonstrated that performing the position task requires more proprioceptive information. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there would be a difference in cutaneous information processing between the position and force tasks by assessing the gating effect, which is reduction of amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and cutaneomuscular reflex (CMR). Eighteen healthy adults participated in this study. They contracted their right first dorsal interosseous muscle by abducting their index finger to produce a constant force against a rigid restraint that was 20% maximum voluntary contraction (force task), or to maintain a target position corresponding to 10° abduction of the metacarpophalangeal joint while supporting a load equivalent to 20% maximum voluntary contraction (position task). During each task, electrical stimulation was applied to the digital nerves of the right index finger, and SEPs and CMR were recorded from C3’ of the International 10–20 system and the right first dorsal interosseous muscle, respectively. Reduction of the amplitude of N33 component of SEPs was significantly larger during the force than position task. In addition, the E2 amplitude of CMR was significantly greater for the force than position task. These findings suggest that cutaneous information processing differs with load type during static muscle contraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9778995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97789952022-12-23 Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction Yunoki, Keisuke Watanabe, Tatsunori Matsumoto, Takuya Kuwabara, Takayuki Horinouchi, Takayuki Ito, Kanami Ishida, Haruki Kirimoto, Hikari PLoS One Research Article During submaximal isometric contraction, there are two different load types: maintenance of a constant limb angle while supporting an inertial load (position task) and maintenance of a constant force by pushing against a rigid restraint (force task). Previous studies demonstrated that performing the position task requires more proprioceptive information. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there would be a difference in cutaneous information processing between the position and force tasks by assessing the gating effect, which is reduction of amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and cutaneomuscular reflex (CMR). Eighteen healthy adults participated in this study. They contracted their right first dorsal interosseous muscle by abducting their index finger to produce a constant force against a rigid restraint that was 20% maximum voluntary contraction (force task), or to maintain a target position corresponding to 10° abduction of the metacarpophalangeal joint while supporting a load equivalent to 20% maximum voluntary contraction (position task). During each task, electrical stimulation was applied to the digital nerves of the right index finger, and SEPs and CMR were recorded from C3’ of the International 10–20 system and the right first dorsal interosseous muscle, respectively. Reduction of the amplitude of N33 component of SEPs was significantly larger during the force than position task. In addition, the E2 amplitude of CMR was significantly greater for the force than position task. These findings suggest that cutaneous information processing differs with load type during static muscle contraction. Public Library of Science 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9778995/ /pubmed/36548285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279477 Text en © 2022 Yunoki et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yunoki, Keisuke
Watanabe, Tatsunori
Matsumoto, Takuya
Kuwabara, Takayuki
Horinouchi, Takayuki
Ito, Kanami
Ishida, Haruki
Kirimoto, Hikari
Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction
title Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction
title_full Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction
title_fullStr Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction
title_full_unstemmed Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction
title_short Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction
title_sort cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279477
work_keys_str_mv AT yunokikeisuke cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction
AT watanabetatsunori cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction
AT matsumototakuya cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction
AT kuwabaratakayuki cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction
AT horinouchitakayuki cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction
AT itokanami cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction
AT ishidaharuki cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction
AT kirimotohikari cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction