Cargando…
Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction
During submaximal isometric contraction, there are two different load types: maintenance of a constant limb angle while supporting an inertial load (position task) and maintenance of a constant force by pushing against a rigid restraint (force task). Previous studies demonstrated that performing the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279477 |
_version_ | 1784856500703854592 |
---|---|
author | Yunoki, Keisuke Watanabe, Tatsunori Matsumoto, Takuya Kuwabara, Takayuki Horinouchi, Takayuki Ito, Kanami Ishida, Haruki Kirimoto, Hikari |
author_facet | Yunoki, Keisuke Watanabe, Tatsunori Matsumoto, Takuya Kuwabara, Takayuki Horinouchi, Takayuki Ito, Kanami Ishida, Haruki Kirimoto, Hikari |
author_sort | Yunoki, Keisuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | During submaximal isometric contraction, there are two different load types: maintenance of a constant limb angle while supporting an inertial load (position task) and maintenance of a constant force by pushing against a rigid restraint (force task). Previous studies demonstrated that performing the position task requires more proprioceptive information. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there would be a difference in cutaneous information processing between the position and force tasks by assessing the gating effect, which is reduction of amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and cutaneomuscular reflex (CMR). Eighteen healthy adults participated in this study. They contracted their right first dorsal interosseous muscle by abducting their index finger to produce a constant force against a rigid restraint that was 20% maximum voluntary contraction (force task), or to maintain a target position corresponding to 10° abduction of the metacarpophalangeal joint while supporting a load equivalent to 20% maximum voluntary contraction (position task). During each task, electrical stimulation was applied to the digital nerves of the right index finger, and SEPs and CMR were recorded from C3’ of the International 10–20 system and the right first dorsal interosseous muscle, respectively. Reduction of the amplitude of N33 component of SEPs was significantly larger during the force than position task. In addition, the E2 amplitude of CMR was significantly greater for the force than position task. These findings suggest that cutaneous information processing differs with load type during static muscle contraction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9778995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97789952022-12-23 Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction Yunoki, Keisuke Watanabe, Tatsunori Matsumoto, Takuya Kuwabara, Takayuki Horinouchi, Takayuki Ito, Kanami Ishida, Haruki Kirimoto, Hikari PLoS One Research Article During submaximal isometric contraction, there are two different load types: maintenance of a constant limb angle while supporting an inertial load (position task) and maintenance of a constant force by pushing against a rigid restraint (force task). Previous studies demonstrated that performing the position task requires more proprioceptive information. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there would be a difference in cutaneous information processing between the position and force tasks by assessing the gating effect, which is reduction of amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and cutaneomuscular reflex (CMR). Eighteen healthy adults participated in this study. They contracted their right first dorsal interosseous muscle by abducting their index finger to produce a constant force against a rigid restraint that was 20% maximum voluntary contraction (force task), or to maintain a target position corresponding to 10° abduction of the metacarpophalangeal joint while supporting a load equivalent to 20% maximum voluntary contraction (position task). During each task, electrical stimulation was applied to the digital nerves of the right index finger, and SEPs and CMR were recorded from C3’ of the International 10–20 system and the right first dorsal interosseous muscle, respectively. Reduction of the amplitude of N33 component of SEPs was significantly larger during the force than position task. In addition, the E2 amplitude of CMR was significantly greater for the force than position task. These findings suggest that cutaneous information processing differs with load type during static muscle contraction. Public Library of Science 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9778995/ /pubmed/36548285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279477 Text en © 2022 Yunoki et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yunoki, Keisuke Watanabe, Tatsunori Matsumoto, Takuya Kuwabara, Takayuki Horinouchi, Takayuki Ito, Kanami Ishida, Haruki Kirimoto, Hikari Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction |
title | Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction |
title_full | Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction |
title_fullStr | Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction |
title_full_unstemmed | Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction |
title_short | Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction |
title_sort | cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279477 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yunokikeisuke cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction AT watanabetatsunori cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction AT matsumototakuya cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction AT kuwabaratakayuki cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction AT horinouchitakayuki cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction AT itokanami cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction AT ishidaharuki cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction AT kirimotohikari cutaneousinformationprocessingdifferswithloadtypeduringisometricfingerabduction |