Cargando…

First Results of Peer Training for Medical Staff—Psychosocial Support through Peer Support in Health Care

Background: In view of the increasing strain on health workers, psychosocial support measures are becoming more important. The core of a sustainable concept is the establishment of peer support teams. Two aspects are central: first, target group-specific training content, and second, suitable staff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hinzmann, Dominik, Koll-Krüsmann, Marion, Forster, Andrea, Schießl, Andreas, Igl, Andreas, Heininger, Susanne Katharina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554778
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416897
_version_ 1784856501909716992
author Hinzmann, Dominik
Koll-Krüsmann, Marion
Forster, Andrea
Schießl, Andreas
Igl, Andreas
Heininger, Susanne Katharina
author_facet Hinzmann, Dominik
Koll-Krüsmann, Marion
Forster, Andrea
Schießl, Andreas
Igl, Andreas
Heininger, Susanne Katharina
author_sort Hinzmann, Dominik
collection PubMed
description Background: In view of the increasing strain on health workers, psychosocial support measures are becoming more important. The core of a sustainable concept is the establishment of peer support teams. Two aspects are central: first, target group-specific training content, and second, suitable staff members who are trained as peers. The goal of the study was to obtain a first look at what content can be taught in peer training for medical staff, how the training is evaluated by the target group, and which people are interested in training from peers. Methods: During the period 2017–2022, Peer Training for medical staff was developed by a non-profit institution in Germany with state funding and the support of a medical professional association and evaluated during the project. Participants (N = 190) in the Peer Training course were interviewed in advance about their experiences and stresses at work using an anonymous questionnaire. After completing the training modules, the participants filled out an evaluation form. Results: The participants of the Peer Training were predominantly female (70.5%) and middle-aged (between 31 and 50 years old). Most (80.3%) experienced stressful events themselves, mostly without any preparation (93.5%) or follow-up (86.8%) by the employer. The participants estimate their workload in the medium range. The proportion of stressed individuals among the participants was below that of various comparison groups as available reference values. The training module itself was evaluated very positively. Conclusions: The content and framework parameters of the training were rated very well. There is a high degree of fit with the requirements in the health sector. The participants in the Peer Training seem to represent a good cross-section of the target group medical staff, also regarding their own experiences, seem to have a good psychological constitution and are therefore very suitable to work as peers after the training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9779000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97790002022-12-23 First Results of Peer Training for Medical Staff—Psychosocial Support through Peer Support in Health Care Hinzmann, Dominik Koll-Krüsmann, Marion Forster, Andrea Schießl, Andreas Igl, Andreas Heininger, Susanne Katharina Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: In view of the increasing strain on health workers, psychosocial support measures are becoming more important. The core of a sustainable concept is the establishment of peer support teams. Two aspects are central: first, target group-specific training content, and second, suitable staff members who are trained as peers. The goal of the study was to obtain a first look at what content can be taught in peer training for medical staff, how the training is evaluated by the target group, and which people are interested in training from peers. Methods: During the period 2017–2022, Peer Training for medical staff was developed by a non-profit institution in Germany with state funding and the support of a medical professional association and evaluated during the project. Participants (N = 190) in the Peer Training course were interviewed in advance about their experiences and stresses at work using an anonymous questionnaire. After completing the training modules, the participants filled out an evaluation form. Results: The participants of the Peer Training were predominantly female (70.5%) and middle-aged (between 31 and 50 years old). Most (80.3%) experienced stressful events themselves, mostly without any preparation (93.5%) or follow-up (86.8%) by the employer. The participants estimate their workload in the medium range. The proportion of stressed individuals among the participants was below that of various comparison groups as available reference values. The training module itself was evaluated very positively. Conclusions: The content and framework parameters of the training were rated very well. There is a high degree of fit with the requirements in the health sector. The participants in the Peer Training seem to represent a good cross-section of the target group medical staff, also regarding their own experiences, seem to have a good psychological constitution and are therefore very suitable to work as peers after the training. MDPI 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9779000/ /pubmed/36554778 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416897 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hinzmann, Dominik
Koll-Krüsmann, Marion
Forster, Andrea
Schießl, Andreas
Igl, Andreas
Heininger, Susanne Katharina
First Results of Peer Training for Medical Staff—Psychosocial Support through Peer Support in Health Care
title First Results of Peer Training for Medical Staff—Psychosocial Support through Peer Support in Health Care
title_full First Results of Peer Training for Medical Staff—Psychosocial Support through Peer Support in Health Care
title_fullStr First Results of Peer Training for Medical Staff—Psychosocial Support through Peer Support in Health Care
title_full_unstemmed First Results of Peer Training for Medical Staff—Psychosocial Support through Peer Support in Health Care
title_short First Results of Peer Training for Medical Staff—Psychosocial Support through Peer Support in Health Care
title_sort first results of peer training for medical staff—psychosocial support through peer support in health care
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554778
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416897
work_keys_str_mv AT hinzmanndominik firstresultsofpeertrainingformedicalstaffpsychosocialsupportthroughpeersupportinhealthcare
AT kollkrusmannmarion firstresultsofpeertrainingformedicalstaffpsychosocialsupportthroughpeersupportinhealthcare
AT forsterandrea firstresultsofpeertrainingformedicalstaffpsychosocialsupportthroughpeersupportinhealthcare
AT schießlandreas firstresultsofpeertrainingformedicalstaffpsychosocialsupportthroughpeersupportinhealthcare
AT iglandreas firstresultsofpeertrainingformedicalstaffpsychosocialsupportthroughpeersupportinhealthcare
AT heiningersusannekatharina firstresultsofpeertrainingformedicalstaffpsychosocialsupportthroughpeersupportinhealthcare