Cargando…

The Effect of Fire Smoke Exposure on Firefighters’ Lung Function: A Meta-Analysis

Firefighters are exposed to a range of harmful substances during firefighting. Exposure to fire smoke has been associated with a decrease in their lung function. However, the cause–effect relationship between those two factors is not yet demonstrated. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbosa, Joana V., Farraia, Mariana, Branco, Pedro T. B. S., Alvim-Ferraz, Maria Conceição M., Martins, Fernando G., Annesi-Maesano, Isabella, Sousa, Sofia I. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416799
Descripción
Sumario:Firefighters are exposed to a range of harmful substances during firefighting. Exposure to fire smoke has been associated with a decrease in their lung function. However, the cause–effect relationship between those two factors is not yet demonstrated. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potential associations between firefighters’ occupational exposure and their lung function deterioration. Studies were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Science Direct databases (August 1990–March 2021). The studies were included when reporting the lung function values of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) or Forced Vital Capacity (FVC). The meta-analyses were performed using the generic inverse variance in R software with a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was used to determine if the lung function was influenced by a potential study effect or by the participants’ characteristics. A total of 5562 participants from 24 studies were included. No significant difference was found between firefighters’ predicted FEV(1) from wildland, 97.64% (95% CI: 91.45–103.82%; I(2) = 99%), and urban fires, 99.71% (95% CI: 96.75–102.67%; I(2) = 98%). Similar results were found for the predicted FVC. Nevertheless, the mean values of firefighters’ predicted lung function varied significantly among studies, suggesting many confounders, such as trials’ design, statistical methods, methodologies applied, firefighters’ daily exposure and career length, hindering an appropriate comparison between the studies.