Cargando…

The Effect of Fire Smoke Exposure on Firefighters’ Lung Function: A Meta-Analysis

Firefighters are exposed to a range of harmful substances during firefighting. Exposure to fire smoke has been associated with a decrease in their lung function. However, the cause–effect relationship between those two factors is not yet demonstrated. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbosa, Joana V., Farraia, Mariana, Branco, Pedro T. B. S., Alvim-Ferraz, Maria Conceição M., Martins, Fernando G., Annesi-Maesano, Isabella, Sousa, Sofia I. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416799
_version_ 1784856572872097792
author Barbosa, Joana V.
Farraia, Mariana
Branco, Pedro T. B. S.
Alvim-Ferraz, Maria Conceição M.
Martins, Fernando G.
Annesi-Maesano, Isabella
Sousa, Sofia I. V.
author_facet Barbosa, Joana V.
Farraia, Mariana
Branco, Pedro T. B. S.
Alvim-Ferraz, Maria Conceição M.
Martins, Fernando G.
Annesi-Maesano, Isabella
Sousa, Sofia I. V.
author_sort Barbosa, Joana V.
collection PubMed
description Firefighters are exposed to a range of harmful substances during firefighting. Exposure to fire smoke has been associated with a decrease in their lung function. However, the cause–effect relationship between those two factors is not yet demonstrated. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potential associations between firefighters’ occupational exposure and their lung function deterioration. Studies were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Science Direct databases (August 1990–March 2021). The studies were included when reporting the lung function values of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) or Forced Vital Capacity (FVC). The meta-analyses were performed using the generic inverse variance in R software with a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was used to determine if the lung function was influenced by a potential study effect or by the participants’ characteristics. A total of 5562 participants from 24 studies were included. No significant difference was found between firefighters’ predicted FEV(1) from wildland, 97.64% (95% CI: 91.45–103.82%; I(2) = 99%), and urban fires, 99.71% (95% CI: 96.75–102.67%; I(2) = 98%). Similar results were found for the predicted FVC. Nevertheless, the mean values of firefighters’ predicted lung function varied significantly among studies, suggesting many confounders, such as trials’ design, statistical methods, methodologies applied, firefighters’ daily exposure and career length, hindering an appropriate comparison between the studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9779288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97792882022-12-23 The Effect of Fire Smoke Exposure on Firefighters’ Lung Function: A Meta-Analysis Barbosa, Joana V. Farraia, Mariana Branco, Pedro T. B. S. Alvim-Ferraz, Maria Conceição M. Martins, Fernando G. Annesi-Maesano, Isabella Sousa, Sofia I. V. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Firefighters are exposed to a range of harmful substances during firefighting. Exposure to fire smoke has been associated with a decrease in their lung function. However, the cause–effect relationship between those two factors is not yet demonstrated. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potential associations between firefighters’ occupational exposure and their lung function deterioration. Studies were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Science Direct databases (August 1990–March 2021). The studies were included when reporting the lung function values of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) or Forced Vital Capacity (FVC). The meta-analyses were performed using the generic inverse variance in R software with a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was used to determine if the lung function was influenced by a potential study effect or by the participants’ characteristics. A total of 5562 participants from 24 studies were included. No significant difference was found between firefighters’ predicted FEV(1) from wildland, 97.64% (95% CI: 91.45–103.82%; I(2) = 99%), and urban fires, 99.71% (95% CI: 96.75–102.67%; I(2) = 98%). Similar results were found for the predicted FVC. Nevertheless, the mean values of firefighters’ predicted lung function varied significantly among studies, suggesting many confounders, such as trials’ design, statistical methods, methodologies applied, firefighters’ daily exposure and career length, hindering an appropriate comparison between the studies. MDPI 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9779288/ /pubmed/36554677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416799 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Barbosa, Joana V.
Farraia, Mariana
Branco, Pedro T. B. S.
Alvim-Ferraz, Maria Conceição M.
Martins, Fernando G.
Annesi-Maesano, Isabella
Sousa, Sofia I. V.
The Effect of Fire Smoke Exposure on Firefighters’ Lung Function: A Meta-Analysis
title The Effect of Fire Smoke Exposure on Firefighters’ Lung Function: A Meta-Analysis
title_full The Effect of Fire Smoke Exposure on Firefighters’ Lung Function: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Effect of Fire Smoke Exposure on Firefighters’ Lung Function: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Fire Smoke Exposure on Firefighters’ Lung Function: A Meta-Analysis
title_short The Effect of Fire Smoke Exposure on Firefighters’ Lung Function: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort effect of fire smoke exposure on firefighters’ lung function: a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416799
work_keys_str_mv AT barbosajoanav theeffectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT farraiamariana theeffectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT brancopedrotbs theeffectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT alvimferrazmariaconceicaom theeffectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT martinsfernandog theeffectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT annesimaesanoisabella theeffectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT sousasofiaiv theeffectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT barbosajoanav effectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT farraiamariana effectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT brancopedrotbs effectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT alvimferrazmariaconceicaom effectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT martinsfernandog effectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT annesimaesanoisabella effectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis
AT sousasofiaiv effectoffiresmokeexposureonfirefighterslungfunctionametaanalysis