Cargando…

Screening for Referral of Serious Pathology by Physical Examination Tests in Patients with Back or Chest Pain: A Systematic Review

Objective: To investigate the most common physical examination tests (PET) for the screening for referral of patients with back or chest pain caused by serious pathology. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Searches were performed on seven electronic databases between June 2020 and December...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andreoletti, Federico, Maselli, Filippo, Storari, Lorenzo, Vongher, Andrea, Erbesato, Monica, Testa, Marco, Turolla, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554298
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416418
_version_ 1784856573583032320
author Andreoletti, Federico
Maselli, Filippo
Storari, Lorenzo
Vongher, Andrea
Erbesato, Monica
Testa, Marco
Turolla, Andrea
author_facet Andreoletti, Federico
Maselli, Filippo
Storari, Lorenzo
Vongher, Andrea
Erbesato, Monica
Testa, Marco
Turolla, Andrea
author_sort Andreoletti, Federico
collection PubMed
description Objective: To investigate the most common physical examination tests (PET) for the screening for referral of patients with back or chest pain caused by serious pathology. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Searches were performed on seven electronic databases between June 2020 and December 2021. Only studies evaluating patients with back and/or chest pain with clear reporting of PETs and prompt patient referrals were included. Results: 316 full texts were included, and these studies had a total of 474/492 patients affected by a serious disease. Only 26 studies of them described suspicion of serious disease due to at least one positive PET. Cardiac/pulmonary auscultation and heartbeats/blood pressure measurements were the most frequently reported tests. None of the reported studies included physiotherapists and chiropractors who reported the use of various tests, such as: cardiac and pulmonary auscultation, lung percussion, costovertebral angle tenderness, and lymph node palpation, highlighting a lack of attention in measuring vital parameters. On the contrary, doctors and nurses reported the assessment of the range of motion of the thoracolumbar spine and hip less frequently. Conclusions: Appropriate reporting of PETs is sparse, and their utilization is heterogeneous among different healthcare professionals. Further primary studies are needed to describe PETs results in patients suffering from back and/or chest pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9779291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97792912022-12-23 Screening for Referral of Serious Pathology by Physical Examination Tests in Patients with Back or Chest Pain: A Systematic Review Andreoletti, Federico Maselli, Filippo Storari, Lorenzo Vongher, Andrea Erbesato, Monica Testa, Marco Turolla, Andrea Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Objective: To investigate the most common physical examination tests (PET) for the screening for referral of patients with back or chest pain caused by serious pathology. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Searches were performed on seven electronic databases between June 2020 and December 2021. Only studies evaluating patients with back and/or chest pain with clear reporting of PETs and prompt patient referrals were included. Results: 316 full texts were included, and these studies had a total of 474/492 patients affected by a serious disease. Only 26 studies of them described suspicion of serious disease due to at least one positive PET. Cardiac/pulmonary auscultation and heartbeats/blood pressure measurements were the most frequently reported tests. None of the reported studies included physiotherapists and chiropractors who reported the use of various tests, such as: cardiac and pulmonary auscultation, lung percussion, costovertebral angle tenderness, and lymph node palpation, highlighting a lack of attention in measuring vital parameters. On the contrary, doctors and nurses reported the assessment of the range of motion of the thoracolumbar spine and hip less frequently. Conclusions: Appropriate reporting of PETs is sparse, and their utilization is heterogeneous among different healthcare professionals. Further primary studies are needed to describe PETs results in patients suffering from back and/or chest pain. MDPI 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9779291/ /pubmed/36554298 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416418 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Andreoletti, Federico
Maselli, Filippo
Storari, Lorenzo
Vongher, Andrea
Erbesato, Monica
Testa, Marco
Turolla, Andrea
Screening for Referral of Serious Pathology by Physical Examination Tests in Patients with Back or Chest Pain: A Systematic Review
title Screening for Referral of Serious Pathology by Physical Examination Tests in Patients with Back or Chest Pain: A Systematic Review
title_full Screening for Referral of Serious Pathology by Physical Examination Tests in Patients with Back or Chest Pain: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Screening for Referral of Serious Pathology by Physical Examination Tests in Patients with Back or Chest Pain: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Referral of Serious Pathology by Physical Examination Tests in Patients with Back or Chest Pain: A Systematic Review
title_short Screening for Referral of Serious Pathology by Physical Examination Tests in Patients with Back or Chest Pain: A Systematic Review
title_sort screening for referral of serious pathology by physical examination tests in patients with back or chest pain: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554298
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416418
work_keys_str_mv AT andreolettifederico screeningforreferralofseriouspathologybyphysicalexaminationtestsinpatientswithbackorchestpainasystematicreview
AT masellifilippo screeningforreferralofseriouspathologybyphysicalexaminationtestsinpatientswithbackorchestpainasystematicreview
AT storarilorenzo screeningforreferralofseriouspathologybyphysicalexaminationtestsinpatientswithbackorchestpainasystematicreview
AT vongherandrea screeningforreferralofseriouspathologybyphysicalexaminationtestsinpatientswithbackorchestpainasystematicreview
AT erbesatomonica screeningforreferralofseriouspathologybyphysicalexaminationtestsinpatientswithbackorchestpainasystematicreview
AT testamarco screeningforreferralofseriouspathologybyphysicalexaminationtestsinpatientswithbackorchestpainasystematicreview
AT turollaandrea screeningforreferralofseriouspathologybyphysicalexaminationtestsinpatientswithbackorchestpainasystematicreview