Cargando…

Examining Psychotherapeutic Processes with Depressed Adolescents: A Comparative Study of Two Psychodynamic Therapies

To understand processes associated with better or poorer psychotherapy outcomes is vital. This study examined and contrasted interaction patterns between one therapist and two depressed 17-year-old girls, Johanna (good outcome) and Sonja (poor outcome), in short-term psychoanalytic therapies selecte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calderon, Ana, Storeide, Knut Arne Hooper, Elvejord, Cecilie, Nissen-Lie, Helene Amundsen, Ulberg, Randi, Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554820
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416939
_version_ 1784856655361474560
author Calderon, Ana
Storeide, Knut Arne Hooper
Elvejord, Cecilie
Nissen-Lie, Helene Amundsen
Ulberg, Randi
Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen
author_facet Calderon, Ana
Storeide, Knut Arne Hooper
Elvejord, Cecilie
Nissen-Lie, Helene Amundsen
Ulberg, Randi
Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen
author_sort Calderon, Ana
collection PubMed
description To understand processes associated with better or poorer psychotherapy outcomes is vital. This study examined and contrasted interaction patterns between one therapist and two depressed 17-year-old girls, Johanna (good outcome) and Sonja (poor outcome), in short-term psychoanalytic therapies selected from an RCT. Outcome data were collected regarding level of inter- and intra-personal functioning and symptoms of depression. Process data were obtained using the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-Set on all available sessions. Analyses yielded five relational patterns or “interaction structures” in the two therapy processes; Three explained most of the variance in sessions with Johanna (i.e., ‘positive working alliance’, ‘therapist’s active use of psychodynamic techniques’, and ‘a receptive patient’) and two explained more of the variance in sessions with Sonja (i.e., ‘therapist using a more problem-solving and symptom-oriented approach’ and ‘patient displaying limited capacity for mentalization’). The processes in the two cases presented differences related to mentalization, psychological mindedness, and attachment style of the patients. The therapist used different therapeutic approaches, favouring more psychodynamic interventions in the good outcome case and a more problem-solving and symptom-oriented approach with the poor outcome case. In the latter case, the relationship seemed to be more of a struggle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9779625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97796252022-12-23 Examining Psychotherapeutic Processes with Depressed Adolescents: A Comparative Study of Two Psychodynamic Therapies Calderon, Ana Storeide, Knut Arne Hooper Elvejord, Cecilie Nissen-Lie, Helene Amundsen Ulberg, Randi Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen Int J Environ Res Public Health Article To understand processes associated with better or poorer psychotherapy outcomes is vital. This study examined and contrasted interaction patterns between one therapist and two depressed 17-year-old girls, Johanna (good outcome) and Sonja (poor outcome), in short-term psychoanalytic therapies selected from an RCT. Outcome data were collected regarding level of inter- and intra-personal functioning and symptoms of depression. Process data were obtained using the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-Set on all available sessions. Analyses yielded five relational patterns or “interaction structures” in the two therapy processes; Three explained most of the variance in sessions with Johanna (i.e., ‘positive working alliance’, ‘therapist’s active use of psychodynamic techniques’, and ‘a receptive patient’) and two explained more of the variance in sessions with Sonja (i.e., ‘therapist using a more problem-solving and symptom-oriented approach’ and ‘patient displaying limited capacity for mentalization’). The processes in the two cases presented differences related to mentalization, psychological mindedness, and attachment style of the patients. The therapist used different therapeutic approaches, favouring more psychodynamic interventions in the good outcome case and a more problem-solving and symptom-oriented approach with the poor outcome case. In the latter case, the relationship seemed to be more of a struggle. MDPI 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9779625/ /pubmed/36554820 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416939 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Calderon, Ana
Storeide, Knut Arne Hooper
Elvejord, Cecilie
Nissen-Lie, Helene Amundsen
Ulberg, Randi
Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen
Examining Psychotherapeutic Processes with Depressed Adolescents: A Comparative Study of Two Psychodynamic Therapies
title Examining Psychotherapeutic Processes with Depressed Adolescents: A Comparative Study of Two Psychodynamic Therapies
title_full Examining Psychotherapeutic Processes with Depressed Adolescents: A Comparative Study of Two Psychodynamic Therapies
title_fullStr Examining Psychotherapeutic Processes with Depressed Adolescents: A Comparative Study of Two Psychodynamic Therapies
title_full_unstemmed Examining Psychotherapeutic Processes with Depressed Adolescents: A Comparative Study of Two Psychodynamic Therapies
title_short Examining Psychotherapeutic Processes with Depressed Adolescents: A Comparative Study of Two Psychodynamic Therapies
title_sort examining psychotherapeutic processes with depressed adolescents: a comparative study of two psychodynamic therapies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554820
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416939
work_keys_str_mv AT calderonana examiningpsychotherapeuticprocesseswithdepressedadolescentsacomparativestudyoftwopsychodynamictherapies
AT storeideknutarnehooper examiningpsychotherapeuticprocesseswithdepressedadolescentsacomparativestudyoftwopsychodynamictherapies
AT elvejordcecilie examiningpsychotherapeuticprocesseswithdepressedadolescentsacomparativestudyoftwopsychodynamictherapies
AT nissenlieheleneamundsen examiningpsychotherapeuticprocesseswithdepressedadolescentsacomparativestudyoftwopsychodynamictherapies
AT ulbergrandi examiningpsychotherapeuticprocesseswithdepressedadolescentsacomparativestudyoftwopsychodynamictherapies
AT dahlhannesofiejohnsen examiningpsychotherapeuticprocesseswithdepressedadolescentsacomparativestudyoftwopsychodynamictherapies