Cargando…

Comparing antigenaemia- and microfilaraemia as criteria for stopping decisions in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes in Africa

BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) is the main strategy towards lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination. Progress is monitored by assessing microfilaraemia (Mf) or circulating filarial antigenaemia (CFA) prevalence, the latter being more practical for field surveys. The current criterion for s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stolk, Wilma A., Coffeng, Luc E., Bolay, Fatorma K., Eneanya, Obiora A., Fischer, Peter U., Hollingsworth, T. Déirdre, Koudou, Benjamin G., Méité, Aboulaye, Michael, Edwin, Prada, Joaquin M., Caja Rivera, Rocio M., Sharma, Swarnali, Touloupou, Panayiota, Weil, Gary J., de Vlas, Sake J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36508458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010953
_version_ 1784856678918782976
author Stolk, Wilma A.
Coffeng, Luc E.
Bolay, Fatorma K.
Eneanya, Obiora A.
Fischer, Peter U.
Hollingsworth, T. Déirdre
Koudou, Benjamin G.
Méité, Aboulaye
Michael, Edwin
Prada, Joaquin M.
Caja Rivera, Rocio M.
Sharma, Swarnali
Touloupou, Panayiota
Weil, Gary J.
de Vlas, Sake J.
author_facet Stolk, Wilma A.
Coffeng, Luc E.
Bolay, Fatorma K.
Eneanya, Obiora A.
Fischer, Peter U.
Hollingsworth, T. Déirdre
Koudou, Benjamin G.
Méité, Aboulaye
Michael, Edwin
Prada, Joaquin M.
Caja Rivera, Rocio M.
Sharma, Swarnali
Touloupou, Panayiota
Weil, Gary J.
de Vlas, Sake J.
author_sort Stolk, Wilma A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) is the main strategy towards lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination. Progress is monitored by assessing microfilaraemia (Mf) or circulating filarial antigenaemia (CFA) prevalence, the latter being more practical for field surveys. The current criterion for stopping MDA requires <2% CFA prevalence in 6- to 7-year olds, but this criterion is not evidence-based. We used mathematical modelling to investigate the validity of different thresholds regarding testing method and age group for African MDA programmes using ivermectin plus albendazole. METHODOLGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We verified that our model captures observed patterns in Mf and CFA prevalence during annual MDA, assuming that CFA tests are positive if at least one adult worm is present. We then assessed how well elimination can be predicted from CFA prevalence in 6-7-year-old children or from Mf or CFA prevalence in the 5+ or 15+ population, and determined safe (>95% positive predictive value) thresholds for stopping MDA. The model captured trends in Mf and CFA prevalences reasonably well. Elimination cannot be predicted with sufficient certainty from CFA prevalence in 6-7-year olds. Resurgence may still occur if all children are antigen-negative, irrespective of the number tested. Mf-based criteria also show unfavourable results (PPV <95% or unpractically low threshold). CFA prevalences in the 5+ or 15+ population are the best predictors, and post-MDA threshold values for stopping MDA can be as high as 10% for 15+. These thresholds are robust for various alternative assumptions regarding baseline endemicity, biological parameters and sampling strategies. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: For African areas with moderate to high pre-treatment Mf prevalence that have had 6 or more rounds of annual ivermectin/albendazole MDA with adequate coverage, we recommend to adopt a CFA threshold prevalence of 10% in adults (15+) for stopping MDA. This could be combined with Mf testing of CFA positives to ensure absence of a significant Mf reservoir for transmission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9779720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97797202022-12-23 Comparing antigenaemia- and microfilaraemia as criteria for stopping decisions in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes in Africa Stolk, Wilma A. Coffeng, Luc E. Bolay, Fatorma K. Eneanya, Obiora A. Fischer, Peter U. Hollingsworth, T. Déirdre Koudou, Benjamin G. Méité, Aboulaye Michael, Edwin Prada, Joaquin M. Caja Rivera, Rocio M. Sharma, Swarnali Touloupou, Panayiota Weil, Gary J. de Vlas, Sake J. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) is the main strategy towards lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination. Progress is monitored by assessing microfilaraemia (Mf) or circulating filarial antigenaemia (CFA) prevalence, the latter being more practical for field surveys. The current criterion for stopping MDA requires <2% CFA prevalence in 6- to 7-year olds, but this criterion is not evidence-based. We used mathematical modelling to investigate the validity of different thresholds regarding testing method and age group for African MDA programmes using ivermectin plus albendazole. METHODOLGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We verified that our model captures observed patterns in Mf and CFA prevalence during annual MDA, assuming that CFA tests are positive if at least one adult worm is present. We then assessed how well elimination can be predicted from CFA prevalence in 6-7-year-old children or from Mf or CFA prevalence in the 5+ or 15+ population, and determined safe (>95% positive predictive value) thresholds for stopping MDA. The model captured trends in Mf and CFA prevalences reasonably well. Elimination cannot be predicted with sufficient certainty from CFA prevalence in 6-7-year olds. Resurgence may still occur if all children are antigen-negative, irrespective of the number tested. Mf-based criteria also show unfavourable results (PPV <95% or unpractically low threshold). CFA prevalences in the 5+ or 15+ population are the best predictors, and post-MDA threshold values for stopping MDA can be as high as 10% for 15+. These thresholds are robust for various alternative assumptions regarding baseline endemicity, biological parameters and sampling strategies. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: For African areas with moderate to high pre-treatment Mf prevalence that have had 6 or more rounds of annual ivermectin/albendazole MDA with adequate coverage, we recommend to adopt a CFA threshold prevalence of 10% in adults (15+) for stopping MDA. This could be combined with Mf testing of CFA positives to ensure absence of a significant Mf reservoir for transmission. Public Library of Science 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9779720/ /pubmed/36508458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010953 Text en © 2022 Stolk et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stolk, Wilma A.
Coffeng, Luc E.
Bolay, Fatorma K.
Eneanya, Obiora A.
Fischer, Peter U.
Hollingsworth, T. Déirdre
Koudou, Benjamin G.
Méité, Aboulaye
Michael, Edwin
Prada, Joaquin M.
Caja Rivera, Rocio M.
Sharma, Swarnali
Touloupou, Panayiota
Weil, Gary J.
de Vlas, Sake J.
Comparing antigenaemia- and microfilaraemia as criteria for stopping decisions in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes in Africa
title Comparing antigenaemia- and microfilaraemia as criteria for stopping decisions in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes in Africa
title_full Comparing antigenaemia- and microfilaraemia as criteria for stopping decisions in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes in Africa
title_fullStr Comparing antigenaemia- and microfilaraemia as criteria for stopping decisions in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes in Africa
title_full_unstemmed Comparing antigenaemia- and microfilaraemia as criteria for stopping decisions in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes in Africa
title_short Comparing antigenaemia- and microfilaraemia as criteria for stopping decisions in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes in Africa
title_sort comparing antigenaemia- and microfilaraemia as criteria for stopping decisions in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes in africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36508458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010953
work_keys_str_mv AT stolkwilmaa comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT coffengluce comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT bolayfatormak comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT eneanyaobioraa comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT fischerpeteru comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT hollingsworthtdeirdre comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT koudoubenjaming comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT meiteaboulaye comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT michaeledwin comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT pradajoaquinm comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT cajariverarociom comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT sharmaswarnali comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT touloupoupanayiota comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT weilgaryj comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica
AT devlassakej comparingantigenaemiaandmicrofilaraemiaascriteriaforstoppingdecisionsinlymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogrammesinafrica