Cargando…

An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires

Fires are one of the main disasters in underground engineering. In order to comprehensively describe and evaluate the risk of underground engineering fires, this study proposes a UEF risk assessment method based on EPB-FBN. Firstly, based on the EPB model, the static and dynamic information of the f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Qi, Zhu, Hongqinq, Zhang, Xiaolei, Zhang, Baozhen, Zhang, Xingkai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554815
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416934
_version_ 1784856682656956416
author Yuan, Qi
Zhu, Hongqinq
Zhang, Xiaolei
Zhang, Baozhen
Zhang, Xingkai
author_facet Yuan, Qi
Zhu, Hongqinq
Zhang, Xiaolei
Zhang, Baozhen
Zhang, Xingkai
author_sort Yuan, Qi
collection PubMed
description Fires are one of the main disasters in underground engineering. In order to comprehensively describe and evaluate the risk of underground engineering fires, this study proposes a UEF risk assessment method based on EPB-FBN. Firstly, based on the EPB model, the static and dynamic information of the fire, such as the cause, occurrence, hazard, product, consequence, and emergency rescue, was analyzed. An EPB model of underground engineering fires was established, and the EPB model was transformed into a BN structure through the conversion rules. Secondly, a fuzzy number was used to describe the state of UEF variable nodes, and a fuzzy conditional probability table was established to describe the uncertain logical relationship between UEF nodes. In order to make full use of the expert knowledge and empirical data, the probability was divided into intervals, and a triangulated fuzzy number was used to represent the linguistic variables judged by experts. The α-weighted valuation method was used for de-fuzzification, and the exact conditional probability table parameters were obtained. Through fuzzy Bayesian inference, the key risk factors can be identified, the sensitivity value of key factors can be calculated, and the maximum risk chain can be found in the case of known evidence. Finally, the method was applied to the deductive analysis of three scenarios. The results show that the model can provide realistic analysis ideas for fire safety evaluation and emergency management of underground engineering. The proposed EPB risk assessment model provides a new perspective for the analysis of UEF accidents and contributes to the ongoing development of UEF research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9779735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97797352022-12-23 An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires Yuan, Qi Zhu, Hongqinq Zhang, Xiaolei Zhang, Baozhen Zhang, Xingkai Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Fires are one of the main disasters in underground engineering. In order to comprehensively describe and evaluate the risk of underground engineering fires, this study proposes a UEF risk assessment method based on EPB-FBN. Firstly, based on the EPB model, the static and dynamic information of the fire, such as the cause, occurrence, hazard, product, consequence, and emergency rescue, was analyzed. An EPB model of underground engineering fires was established, and the EPB model was transformed into a BN structure through the conversion rules. Secondly, a fuzzy number was used to describe the state of UEF variable nodes, and a fuzzy conditional probability table was established to describe the uncertain logical relationship between UEF nodes. In order to make full use of the expert knowledge and empirical data, the probability was divided into intervals, and a triangulated fuzzy number was used to represent the linguistic variables judged by experts. The α-weighted valuation method was used for de-fuzzification, and the exact conditional probability table parameters were obtained. Through fuzzy Bayesian inference, the key risk factors can be identified, the sensitivity value of key factors can be calculated, and the maximum risk chain can be found in the case of known evidence. Finally, the method was applied to the deductive analysis of three scenarios. The results show that the model can provide realistic analysis ideas for fire safety evaluation and emergency management of underground engineering. The proposed EPB risk assessment model provides a new perspective for the analysis of UEF accidents and contributes to the ongoing development of UEF research. MDPI 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9779735/ /pubmed/36554815 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416934 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yuan, Qi
Zhu, Hongqinq
Zhang, Xiaolei
Zhang, Baozhen
Zhang, Xingkai
An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires
title An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires
title_full An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires
title_fullStr An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires
title_full_unstemmed An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires
title_short An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires
title_sort integrated quantitative risk assessment method for underground engineering fires
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36554815
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416934
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanqi anintegratedquantitativeriskassessmentmethodforundergroundengineeringfires
AT zhuhongqinq anintegratedquantitativeriskassessmentmethodforundergroundengineeringfires
AT zhangxiaolei anintegratedquantitativeriskassessmentmethodforundergroundengineeringfires
AT zhangbaozhen anintegratedquantitativeriskassessmentmethodforundergroundengineeringfires
AT zhangxingkai anintegratedquantitativeriskassessmentmethodforundergroundengineeringfires
AT yuanqi integratedquantitativeriskassessmentmethodforundergroundengineeringfires
AT zhuhongqinq integratedquantitativeriskassessmentmethodforundergroundengineeringfires
AT zhangxiaolei integratedquantitativeriskassessmentmethodforundergroundengineeringfires
AT zhangbaozhen integratedquantitativeriskassessmentmethodforundergroundengineeringfires
AT zhangxingkai integratedquantitativeriskassessmentmethodforundergroundengineeringfires