Cargando…

Electronic health record-based facilitation of familial hypercholesterolaemia detection sensitivity of different algorithms in genetically confirmed patients

AIMS: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a disorder of LDL cholesterol clearance, resulting in increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Recently, we developed a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria-based algorithm to facilitate FH detection in electronic health records (EHRs). In this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammadnia, Niekbachsh, Akyea, Ralph K, Qureshi, Nadeem, Bax, Willem A, Cornel, Jan H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36710904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac059
_version_ 1784856695284957184
author Mohammadnia, Niekbachsh
Akyea, Ralph K
Qureshi, Nadeem
Bax, Willem A
Cornel, Jan H
author_facet Mohammadnia, Niekbachsh
Akyea, Ralph K
Qureshi, Nadeem
Bax, Willem A
Cornel, Jan H
author_sort Mohammadnia, Niekbachsh
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a disorder of LDL cholesterol clearance, resulting in increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Recently, we developed a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria-based algorithm to facilitate FH detection in electronic health records (EHRs). In this study, we investigated the sensitivity of this and other algorithms in a genetically confirmed FH population. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with a healthcare insurance-related coded diagnosis of ‘primary dyslipidaemia’ between 2018 and 2020 were assessed for genetically confirmed FH. Data were extracted at the time of genetic confirmation of FH (T1) and during the first visit in 2018–2020 (T2). We assessed the sensitivity of algorithms on T1 and T2 for DLCN ≥ 6 and compared with other algorithms [familial hypercholesterolaemia case ascertainment tool (FAMCAT), Make Early Diagnoses to Prevent Early Death (MEDPED), and Simon Broome (SB)] using EHR-coded data and using all available data (i.e. including non-coded free text). 208 patients with genetically confirmed FH were included. The sensitivity (95% CI) on T1 and T2 with EHR-coded data for DLCN ≥ 6 was 19% (14–25%) and 22% (17–28%), respectively. When using all available data, the sensitivity for DLCN ≥ 6 was 26% (20–32%) on T1 and 28% (22–34%) on T2. For FAMCAT, the sensitivity with EHR-coded data on T1 was 74% (67–79%) and 32% (26–39%) on T2, whilst sensitivity with all available data was 81% on T1 (75–86%) and 45% (39–52%) on T2. For Make Early Diagnoses to Prevent Early Death MEDPED and SB, using all available data, the sensitivity on T1 was 31% (25–37%) and 17% (13–23%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The FAMCAT algorithm had significantly better sensitivity than DLCN, MEDPED, and SB. FAMCAT has the best potential for FH case-finding using EHRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9779787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97797872023-01-27 Electronic health record-based facilitation of familial hypercholesterolaemia detection sensitivity of different algorithms in genetically confirmed patients Mohammadnia, Niekbachsh Akyea, Ralph K Qureshi, Nadeem Bax, Willem A Cornel, Jan H Eur Heart J Digit Health Original Article AIMS: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a disorder of LDL cholesterol clearance, resulting in increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Recently, we developed a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria-based algorithm to facilitate FH detection in electronic health records (EHRs). In this study, we investigated the sensitivity of this and other algorithms in a genetically confirmed FH population. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with a healthcare insurance-related coded diagnosis of ‘primary dyslipidaemia’ between 2018 and 2020 were assessed for genetically confirmed FH. Data were extracted at the time of genetic confirmation of FH (T1) and during the first visit in 2018–2020 (T2). We assessed the sensitivity of algorithms on T1 and T2 for DLCN ≥ 6 and compared with other algorithms [familial hypercholesterolaemia case ascertainment tool (FAMCAT), Make Early Diagnoses to Prevent Early Death (MEDPED), and Simon Broome (SB)] using EHR-coded data and using all available data (i.e. including non-coded free text). 208 patients with genetically confirmed FH were included. The sensitivity (95% CI) on T1 and T2 with EHR-coded data for DLCN ≥ 6 was 19% (14–25%) and 22% (17–28%), respectively. When using all available data, the sensitivity for DLCN ≥ 6 was 26% (20–32%) on T1 and 28% (22–34%) on T2. For FAMCAT, the sensitivity with EHR-coded data on T1 was 74% (67–79%) and 32% (26–39%) on T2, whilst sensitivity with all available data was 81% on T1 (75–86%) and 45% (39–52%) on T2. For Make Early Diagnoses to Prevent Early Death MEDPED and SB, using all available data, the sensitivity on T1 was 31% (25–37%) and 17% (13–23%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The FAMCAT algorithm had significantly better sensitivity than DLCN, MEDPED, and SB. FAMCAT has the best potential for FH case-finding using EHRs. Oxford University Press 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9779787/ /pubmed/36710904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac059 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohammadnia, Niekbachsh
Akyea, Ralph K
Qureshi, Nadeem
Bax, Willem A
Cornel, Jan H
Electronic health record-based facilitation of familial hypercholesterolaemia detection sensitivity of different algorithms in genetically confirmed patients
title Electronic health record-based facilitation of familial hypercholesterolaemia detection sensitivity of different algorithms in genetically confirmed patients
title_full Electronic health record-based facilitation of familial hypercholesterolaemia detection sensitivity of different algorithms in genetically confirmed patients
title_fullStr Electronic health record-based facilitation of familial hypercholesterolaemia detection sensitivity of different algorithms in genetically confirmed patients
title_full_unstemmed Electronic health record-based facilitation of familial hypercholesterolaemia detection sensitivity of different algorithms in genetically confirmed patients
title_short Electronic health record-based facilitation of familial hypercholesterolaemia detection sensitivity of different algorithms in genetically confirmed patients
title_sort electronic health record-based facilitation of familial hypercholesterolaemia detection sensitivity of different algorithms in genetically confirmed patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36710904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac059
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadnianiekbachsh electronichealthrecordbasedfacilitationoffamilialhypercholesterolaemiadetectionsensitivityofdifferentalgorithmsingeneticallyconfirmedpatients
AT akyearalphk electronichealthrecordbasedfacilitationoffamilialhypercholesterolaemiadetectionsensitivityofdifferentalgorithmsingeneticallyconfirmedpatients
AT qureshinadeem electronichealthrecordbasedfacilitationoffamilialhypercholesterolaemiadetectionsensitivityofdifferentalgorithmsingeneticallyconfirmedpatients
AT baxwillema electronichealthrecordbasedfacilitationoffamilialhypercholesterolaemiadetectionsensitivityofdifferentalgorithmsingeneticallyconfirmedpatients
AT corneljanh electronichealthrecordbasedfacilitationoffamilialhypercholesterolaemiadetectionsensitivityofdifferentalgorithmsingeneticallyconfirmedpatients