Cargando…

Performance metrics of AI-enhanced single lead EKG maintained after entry of organised clustered data

BACKGROUND: Our experience in creating innovative Artificial Intelligence-guided single lead EKG methodologies for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) detection within complex EKG records has been previously validated. PURPOSE: By expanding the intricate variables of our previously tested alg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehta, S, Vieira, D, Zerpa, D, Guillen, V, Gonzalez, A, Brena-Pastor, L, Siyam, T, Stoica, S, Ozair, S, Pinos, D, Martinez, F, Fleming, M, Carrera, K, Rossitto, F, Whuking, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779832/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac076.2786
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Our experience in creating innovative Artificial Intelligence-guided single lead EKG methodologies for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) detection within complex EKG records has been previously validated. PURPOSE: By expanding the intricate variables of our previously tested algorithm input, we seek to further improve our STEMI detecting tool. METHODS: 11,567 12-lead EKG records (10-s length, 500 Hz sample frequency) derived from the Latin America Telemedicine Infarct Network database from April 2014 to December 2019. From these records, we included the following balanced classes: angiographically confirmed and unconfirmed STEMI (divided by wall affected), branch blocks, non-specific ST-T changes, normal, and abnormal (Remaining 200+ CPT codes). Cardiologist annotations ensured precision (Ground truth). Determined classes were “STEMI” and “Not-STEMI”. A 1-D Convolutional Neural Network model was trained and tested for each lead with dataset proportions of 90/10, respectively. The last dense layer outputs a probability for each record being STEMI/Not-STEMI. The analysis also included performance metrics and false-negative reports. RESULTS: Overall, the most promising Single lead for STEMI detection was V2 (91.2% Accuracy, 89.6% Sensitivity, and 92.9% Specificity). 55% of false negatives were inferior wall STEMI (Table 1). CONCLUSION: Appreciable progress of our new methodology compared to our previous experiences in AI-guided Single Lead for STEMI detection, especially for lead V2. By performing a thorough analysis of false-negative reports, we aspire to identify potential areas of STEMI detection weakness which will become the focus of future ventures. FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Type of funding sources: None.