Cargando…
Performance metrics of AI-enhanced single lead EKG maintained after entry of organised clustered data
BACKGROUND: Our experience in creating innovative Artificial Intelligence-guided single lead EKG methodologies for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) detection within complex EKG records has been previously validated. PURPOSE: By expanding the intricate variables of our previously tested alg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779832/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac076.2786 |
_version_ | 1784856706405105664 |
---|---|
author | Mehta, S Vieira, D Zerpa, D Guillen, V Gonzalez, A Brena-Pastor, L Siyam, T Stoica, S Ozair, S Pinos, D Martinez, F Fleming, M Carrera, K Rossitto, F Whuking, C |
author_facet | Mehta, S Vieira, D Zerpa, D Guillen, V Gonzalez, A Brena-Pastor, L Siyam, T Stoica, S Ozair, S Pinos, D Martinez, F Fleming, M Carrera, K Rossitto, F Whuking, C |
author_sort | Mehta, S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Our experience in creating innovative Artificial Intelligence-guided single lead EKG methodologies for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) detection within complex EKG records has been previously validated. PURPOSE: By expanding the intricate variables of our previously tested algorithm input, we seek to further improve our STEMI detecting tool. METHODS: 11,567 12-lead EKG records (10-s length, 500 Hz sample frequency) derived from the Latin America Telemedicine Infarct Network database from April 2014 to December 2019. From these records, we included the following balanced classes: angiographically confirmed and unconfirmed STEMI (divided by wall affected), branch blocks, non-specific ST-T changes, normal, and abnormal (Remaining 200+ CPT codes). Cardiologist annotations ensured precision (Ground truth). Determined classes were “STEMI” and “Not-STEMI”. A 1-D Convolutional Neural Network model was trained and tested for each lead with dataset proportions of 90/10, respectively. The last dense layer outputs a probability for each record being STEMI/Not-STEMI. The analysis also included performance metrics and false-negative reports. RESULTS: Overall, the most promising Single lead for STEMI detection was V2 (91.2% Accuracy, 89.6% Sensitivity, and 92.9% Specificity). 55% of false negatives were inferior wall STEMI (Table 1). CONCLUSION: Appreciable progress of our new methodology compared to our previous experiences in AI-guided Single Lead for STEMI detection, especially for lead V2. By performing a thorough analysis of false-negative reports, we aspire to identify potential areas of STEMI detection weakness which will become the focus of future ventures. FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Type of funding sources: None. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9779832 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97798322023-01-27 Performance metrics of AI-enhanced single lead EKG maintained after entry of organised clustered data Mehta, S Vieira, D Zerpa, D Guillen, V Gonzalez, A Brena-Pastor, L Siyam, T Stoica, S Ozair, S Pinos, D Martinez, F Fleming, M Carrera, K Rossitto, F Whuking, C Eur Heart J Digit Health Abstracts BACKGROUND: Our experience in creating innovative Artificial Intelligence-guided single lead EKG methodologies for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) detection within complex EKG records has been previously validated. PURPOSE: By expanding the intricate variables of our previously tested algorithm input, we seek to further improve our STEMI detecting tool. METHODS: 11,567 12-lead EKG records (10-s length, 500 Hz sample frequency) derived from the Latin America Telemedicine Infarct Network database from April 2014 to December 2019. From these records, we included the following balanced classes: angiographically confirmed and unconfirmed STEMI (divided by wall affected), branch blocks, non-specific ST-T changes, normal, and abnormal (Remaining 200+ CPT codes). Cardiologist annotations ensured precision (Ground truth). Determined classes were “STEMI” and “Not-STEMI”. A 1-D Convolutional Neural Network model was trained and tested for each lead with dataset proportions of 90/10, respectively. The last dense layer outputs a probability for each record being STEMI/Not-STEMI. The analysis also included performance metrics and false-negative reports. RESULTS: Overall, the most promising Single lead for STEMI detection was V2 (91.2% Accuracy, 89.6% Sensitivity, and 92.9% Specificity). 55% of false negatives were inferior wall STEMI (Table 1). CONCLUSION: Appreciable progress of our new methodology compared to our previous experiences in AI-guided Single Lead for STEMI detection, especially for lead V2. By performing a thorough analysis of false-negative reports, we aspire to identify potential areas of STEMI detection weakness which will become the focus of future ventures. FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Type of funding sources: None. Oxford University Press 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9779832/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac076.2786 Text en Reproduced from: European Heart Journal, Volume 43, Issue Supplement_2, October 2022, ehac544.2786, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2786 by permission of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. The opinions expressed in the Journal item reproduced as this reprint are those of the authors and contributors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Society of Cardiology, the editors, the editorial board, Oxford University Press or the organization to which the authors are affiliated. The mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations, and the inclusion of advertisements in this reprint do not imply endorsement by the Journal, the editors, the editorial board, Oxford University Press or the organization to which the authors are affiliated. The editors and publishers have taken all reasonable precautions to verify drug names and doses, the results of experimental work and clinical findings published in the Journal. The ultimate responsibility for the use and dosage of drugs mentioned in this reprint and in interpretation of published material lies with the medical practitioner, and the editors and publisher cannot accept liability for damages arising from any error or omissions in the Journal or in this reprint. Please inform the editors of any errors. © The Author(s) 2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Mehta, S Vieira, D Zerpa, D Guillen, V Gonzalez, A Brena-Pastor, L Siyam, T Stoica, S Ozair, S Pinos, D Martinez, F Fleming, M Carrera, K Rossitto, F Whuking, C Performance metrics of AI-enhanced single lead EKG maintained after entry of organised clustered data |
title | Performance metrics of AI-enhanced single lead EKG maintained after entry of organised clustered data |
title_full | Performance metrics of AI-enhanced single lead EKG maintained after entry of organised clustered data |
title_fullStr | Performance metrics of AI-enhanced single lead EKG maintained after entry of organised clustered data |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance metrics of AI-enhanced single lead EKG maintained after entry of organised clustered data |
title_short | Performance metrics of AI-enhanced single lead EKG maintained after entry of organised clustered data |
title_sort | performance metrics of ai-enhanced single lead ekg maintained after entry of organised clustered data |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779832/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac076.2786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehtas performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT vieirad performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT zerpad performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT guillenv performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT gonzaleza performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT brenapastorl performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT siyamt performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT stoicas performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT ozairs performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT pinosd performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT martinezf performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT flemingm performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT carrerak performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT rossittof performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata AT whukingc performancemetricsofaienhancedsingleleadekgmaintainedafterentryoforganisedclustereddata |