Cargando…
Assessment of heart failure parameters by telemonitoring patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
INTRODUCTION: Different heart failure (HF) parameters have been evaluated in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Recently, a multi-parameters HF index available in some ICDs has been proposed for patients monitoring in order to prevent hospitalizations for HF. We sought to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779871/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac076.2806 |
_version_ | 1784856716306808832 |
---|---|
author | Fily, M Feliachi, S Leven, F Inamo, J C Hamonic, J B Mansourati, J |
author_facet | Fily, M Feliachi, S Leven, F Inamo, J C Hamonic, J B Mansourati, J |
author_sort | Fily, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Different heart failure (HF) parameters have been evaluated in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Recently, a multi-parameters HF index available in some ICDs has been proposed for patients monitoring in order to prevent hospitalizations for HF. We sought to analyze this index in our patients, based on the occurrence of hospitalizations for HF and/or all-cause mortality. As a second endpoint, the level of NT-pro-BNP, the treatment of HF and the Minnesota score (quality of life) were as well evaluated. METHOD: This was on an open, single-center, case-control study. Inclusions started on March 2017 to end up in November 2020 with the main criteria of HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%, DDD or CRT-D implanted in primary prevention. A control group was composed of patients receiving telemonitoring and a control group composed of patients receiving standard monitoring. A 1/1 pairing was carried out, based on 3 criteria: age, sex and the date of ICD implantation. Data collection was carried out in August 2021. RESULTS: 74 patients were included in the study; none was lost to follow-up. The occurrence of hospitalization for HF and/or death from any cause was found at the end of the study in 7 of 37 patients in the remote monitoring group versus 22 events of 37 in patients receiving standard monitoring (p=0.011). The number of deaths from any cause was 4 in the study group vs 8 in the control group (NS, p=0.21). The average length of hospital stay is 6.27 days (± 23.6) for patients receiving remote monitoring compared to 9.14 days (± 22.1) p=0.64. NT-pro-BNP was found with a median level of 553 pg/mL [146; 1541] in the remotely monitored group against 498 pg/mL [211; 1400] in controls (p=0.77). The assessment of quality of life by the Minnesota score shows a similar result (p=0.7). Analysis of the treatment of HF shows a significantly (p<0.01) greater presence of anti-aldosterone in patients receiving remote monitoring. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the benefit of the telemonitoring protocol on the occurrence of hospitalizations for heart failure and/or all-cause mortality in heart failure patients with an ICD. We observe a significantly higher percentage of anti-aldosterone treatment in monitored patients, suggesting a more optimized medical treatment. FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Type of funding sources: None. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9779871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97798712023-01-27 Assessment of heart failure parameters by telemonitoring patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator Fily, M Feliachi, S Leven, F Inamo, J C Hamonic, J B Mansourati, J Eur Heart J Digit Health Abstracts INTRODUCTION: Different heart failure (HF) parameters have been evaluated in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Recently, a multi-parameters HF index available in some ICDs has been proposed for patients monitoring in order to prevent hospitalizations for HF. We sought to analyze this index in our patients, based on the occurrence of hospitalizations for HF and/or all-cause mortality. As a second endpoint, the level of NT-pro-BNP, the treatment of HF and the Minnesota score (quality of life) were as well evaluated. METHOD: This was on an open, single-center, case-control study. Inclusions started on March 2017 to end up in November 2020 with the main criteria of HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%, DDD or CRT-D implanted in primary prevention. A control group was composed of patients receiving telemonitoring and a control group composed of patients receiving standard monitoring. A 1/1 pairing was carried out, based on 3 criteria: age, sex and the date of ICD implantation. Data collection was carried out in August 2021. RESULTS: 74 patients were included in the study; none was lost to follow-up. The occurrence of hospitalization for HF and/or death from any cause was found at the end of the study in 7 of 37 patients in the remote monitoring group versus 22 events of 37 in patients receiving standard monitoring (p=0.011). The number of deaths from any cause was 4 in the study group vs 8 in the control group (NS, p=0.21). The average length of hospital stay is 6.27 days (± 23.6) for patients receiving remote monitoring compared to 9.14 days (± 22.1) p=0.64. NT-pro-BNP was found with a median level of 553 pg/mL [146; 1541] in the remotely monitored group against 498 pg/mL [211; 1400] in controls (p=0.77). The assessment of quality of life by the Minnesota score shows a similar result (p=0.7). Analysis of the treatment of HF shows a significantly (p<0.01) greater presence of anti-aldosterone in patients receiving remote monitoring. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the benefit of the telemonitoring protocol on the occurrence of hospitalizations for heart failure and/or all-cause mortality in heart failure patients with an ICD. We observe a significantly higher percentage of anti-aldosterone treatment in monitored patients, suggesting a more optimized medical treatment. FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Type of funding sources: None. Oxford University Press 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9779871/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac076.2806 Text en Reproduced from: European Heart Journal, Volume 43, Issue Supplement_2, October 2022, ehac544.2806, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2806 by permission of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. The opinions expressed in the Journal item reproduced as this reprint are those of the authors and contributors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Society of Cardiology, the editors, the editorial board, Oxford University Press or the organization to which the authors are affiliated. The mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations, and the inclusion of advertisements in this reprint do not imply endorsement by the Journal, the editors, the editorial board, Oxford University Press or the organization to which the authors are affiliated. The editors and publishers have taken all reasonable precautions to verify drug names and doses, the results of experimental work and clinical findings published in the Journal. The ultimate responsibility for the use and dosage of drugs mentioned in this reprint and in interpretation of published material lies with the medical practitioner, and the editors and publisher cannot accept liability for damages arising from any error or omissions in the Journal or in this reprint. Please inform the editors of any errors. © The Author(s) 2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Fily, M Feliachi, S Leven, F Inamo, J C Hamonic, J B Mansourati, J Assessment of heart failure parameters by telemonitoring patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator |
title | Assessment of heart failure parameters by telemonitoring patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator |
title_full | Assessment of heart failure parameters by telemonitoring patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator |
title_fullStr | Assessment of heart failure parameters by telemonitoring patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of heart failure parameters by telemonitoring patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator |
title_short | Assessment of heart failure parameters by telemonitoring patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator |
title_sort | assessment of heart failure parameters by telemonitoring patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779871/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac076.2806 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT filym assessmentofheartfailureparametersbytelemonitoringpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT feliachis assessmentofheartfailureparametersbytelemonitoringpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT levenf assessmentofheartfailureparametersbytelemonitoringpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT inamojc assessmentofheartfailureparametersbytelemonitoringpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT hamonicjb assessmentofheartfailureparametersbytelemonitoringpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT mansouratij assessmentofheartfailureparametersbytelemonitoringpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator |