Cargando…
Effects of lockdown on physical activity and arrhythmia burden in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the COVID-19 Lockdown ICD-Carelink (CLIC) study
BACKGROUND: Both COVID-19 and the measures taken to control the pandemic may significantly affect cardiovascular health. The effects of a lockdown on physical activity and its potential consequences for arrhythmia burden remain largely unknown. PURPOSE: In this study, we investigated the effect of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779887/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac076.2771 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Both COVID-19 and the measures taken to control the pandemic may significantly affect cardiovascular health. The effects of a lockdown on physical activity and its potential consequences for arrhythmia burden remain largely unknown. PURPOSE: In this study, we investigated the effect of the lockdown during the first COVID-19 wave on patients' physical activity and arrhythmia burden. METHODS: All patients with an ICD connected to a Carelink home-monitoring system from two Dutch hospitals were included. Anonymized data on physical activity, heart rate, and occurrence of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF), and atrial fibrillation/tachycardia (AF/AT) were obtained and were compared between March-April 2020 (lockdown) and March-April 2019 (reference) within each patient. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. RESULTS: The ICDs of 531 patients registered significantly less activity during de lockdown period compared to the reference period (210±104 min vs 182±103 min, p<0.0001, Figure 1, panels A and B), while weather conditions improved (1A). Daytime and nighttime heart rates were significantly lower during lockdown compared to the reference period (71.3±9 bpm vs 72.6±9 bpm, p<0.0001 and 63.4±9 vs 63.8±9, p=0.02, respectively). AF/AT burden increased (Figure 2A) while number of VT/VF episodes decreased (2B). There was no significant difference in number of NSVT episodes. CONCLUSION: During the lockdown in the first COVID-19 wave, the Carelink system revealed significantly less activity, increase in AF/AT burden and decrease in VT/VF episodes. Further investigation is needed to understand the relationship between physical activity and the occurrence of arrhythmias in ICD patients. FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Type of funding sources: None. |
---|