Cargando…
Effects of lockdown on physical activity and arrhythmia burden in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the COVID-19 Lockdown ICD-Carelink (CLIC) study
BACKGROUND: Both COVID-19 and the measures taken to control the pandemic may significantly affect cardiovascular health. The effects of a lockdown on physical activity and its potential consequences for arrhythmia burden remain largely unknown. PURPOSE: In this study, we investigated the effect of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779887/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac076.2771 |
_version_ | 1784856720233725952 |
---|---|
author | Ghossein, M A Linz, D Van Kraaij, D J W Van Stipdonk, A M W De Melis, M Vernooy, K Heijman, J |
author_facet | Ghossein, M A Linz, D Van Kraaij, D J W Van Stipdonk, A M W De Melis, M Vernooy, K Heijman, J |
author_sort | Ghossein, M A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Both COVID-19 and the measures taken to control the pandemic may significantly affect cardiovascular health. The effects of a lockdown on physical activity and its potential consequences for arrhythmia burden remain largely unknown. PURPOSE: In this study, we investigated the effect of the lockdown during the first COVID-19 wave on patients' physical activity and arrhythmia burden. METHODS: All patients with an ICD connected to a Carelink home-monitoring system from two Dutch hospitals were included. Anonymized data on physical activity, heart rate, and occurrence of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF), and atrial fibrillation/tachycardia (AF/AT) were obtained and were compared between March-April 2020 (lockdown) and March-April 2019 (reference) within each patient. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. RESULTS: The ICDs of 531 patients registered significantly less activity during de lockdown period compared to the reference period (210±104 min vs 182±103 min, p<0.0001, Figure 1, panels A and B), while weather conditions improved (1A). Daytime and nighttime heart rates were significantly lower during lockdown compared to the reference period (71.3±9 bpm vs 72.6±9 bpm, p<0.0001 and 63.4±9 vs 63.8±9, p=0.02, respectively). AF/AT burden increased (Figure 2A) while number of VT/VF episodes decreased (2B). There was no significant difference in number of NSVT episodes. CONCLUSION: During the lockdown in the first COVID-19 wave, the Carelink system revealed significantly less activity, increase in AF/AT burden and decrease in VT/VF episodes. Further investigation is needed to understand the relationship between physical activity and the occurrence of arrhythmias in ICD patients. FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Type of funding sources: None. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9779887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97798872023-01-27 Effects of lockdown on physical activity and arrhythmia burden in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the COVID-19 Lockdown ICD-Carelink (CLIC) study Ghossein, M A Linz, D Van Kraaij, D J W Van Stipdonk, A M W De Melis, M Vernooy, K Heijman, J Eur Heart J Digit Health Abstracts BACKGROUND: Both COVID-19 and the measures taken to control the pandemic may significantly affect cardiovascular health. The effects of a lockdown on physical activity and its potential consequences for arrhythmia burden remain largely unknown. PURPOSE: In this study, we investigated the effect of the lockdown during the first COVID-19 wave on patients' physical activity and arrhythmia burden. METHODS: All patients with an ICD connected to a Carelink home-monitoring system from two Dutch hospitals were included. Anonymized data on physical activity, heart rate, and occurrence of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF), and atrial fibrillation/tachycardia (AF/AT) were obtained and were compared between March-April 2020 (lockdown) and March-April 2019 (reference) within each patient. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. RESULTS: The ICDs of 531 patients registered significantly less activity during de lockdown period compared to the reference period (210±104 min vs 182±103 min, p<0.0001, Figure 1, panels A and B), while weather conditions improved (1A). Daytime and nighttime heart rates were significantly lower during lockdown compared to the reference period (71.3±9 bpm vs 72.6±9 bpm, p<0.0001 and 63.4±9 vs 63.8±9, p=0.02, respectively). AF/AT burden increased (Figure 2A) while number of VT/VF episodes decreased (2B). There was no significant difference in number of NSVT episodes. CONCLUSION: During the lockdown in the first COVID-19 wave, the Carelink system revealed significantly less activity, increase in AF/AT burden and decrease in VT/VF episodes. Further investigation is needed to understand the relationship between physical activity and the occurrence of arrhythmias in ICD patients. FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Type of funding sources: None. Oxford University Press 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9779887/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac076.2771 Text en Reproduced from: European Heart Journal, Volume 43, Issue Supplement_2, October 2022, ehac544.2771, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2771 by permission of Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. The opinions expressed in the Journal item reproduced as this reprint are those of the authors and contributors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Society of Cardiology, the editors, the editorial board, Oxford University Press or the organization to which the authors are affiliated. The mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations, and the inclusion of advertisements in this reprint do not imply endorsement by the Journal, the editors, the editorial board, Oxford University Press or the organization to which the authors are affiliated. The editors and publishers have taken all reasonable precautions to verify drug names and doses, the results of experimental work and clinical findings published in the Journal. The ultimate responsibility for the use and dosage of drugs mentioned in this reprint and in interpretation of published material lies with the medical practitioner, and the editors and publisher cannot accept liability for damages arising from any error or omissions in the Journal or in this reprint. Please inform the editors of any errors. © The Author(s) 2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Ghossein, M A Linz, D Van Kraaij, D J W Van Stipdonk, A M W De Melis, M Vernooy, K Heijman, J Effects of lockdown on physical activity and arrhythmia burden in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the COVID-19 Lockdown ICD-Carelink (CLIC) study |
title | Effects of lockdown on physical activity and arrhythmia burden in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the COVID-19 Lockdown ICD-Carelink (CLIC) study |
title_full | Effects of lockdown on physical activity and arrhythmia burden in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the COVID-19 Lockdown ICD-Carelink (CLIC) study |
title_fullStr | Effects of lockdown on physical activity and arrhythmia burden in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the COVID-19 Lockdown ICD-Carelink (CLIC) study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of lockdown on physical activity and arrhythmia burden in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the COVID-19 Lockdown ICD-Carelink (CLIC) study |
title_short | Effects of lockdown on physical activity and arrhythmia burden in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the COVID-19 Lockdown ICD-Carelink (CLIC) study |
title_sort | effects of lockdown on physical activity and arrhythmia burden in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: the covid-19 lockdown icd-carelink (clic) study |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779887/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac076.2771 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghosseinma effectsoflockdownonphysicalactivityandarrhythmiaburdeninpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorthecovid19lockdownicdcarelinkclicstudy AT linzd effectsoflockdownonphysicalactivityandarrhythmiaburdeninpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorthecovid19lockdownicdcarelinkclicstudy AT vankraaijdjw effectsoflockdownonphysicalactivityandarrhythmiaburdeninpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorthecovid19lockdownicdcarelinkclicstudy AT vanstipdonkamw effectsoflockdownonphysicalactivityandarrhythmiaburdeninpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorthecovid19lockdownicdcarelinkclicstudy AT demelism effectsoflockdownonphysicalactivityandarrhythmiaburdeninpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorthecovid19lockdownicdcarelinkclicstudy AT vernooyk effectsoflockdownonphysicalactivityandarrhythmiaburdeninpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorthecovid19lockdownicdcarelinkclicstudy AT heijmanj effectsoflockdownonphysicalactivityandarrhythmiaburdeninpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorthecovid19lockdownicdcarelinkclicstudy |