Cargando…

The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the most common malignancy affecting the biliary tree. The only curative treatment is surgical resection, aiming for negative margins (R0). For those who have locally advanced disease, which is borderline resectable, neoadjuvant chemoradiation presents an op...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cremen, Sinead, Kelly, Michael E., Gallagher, Tom K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568243
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975136
_version_ 1784856743606484992
author Cremen, Sinead
Kelly, Michael E.
Gallagher, Tom K.
author_facet Cremen, Sinead
Kelly, Michael E.
Gallagher, Tom K.
author_sort Cremen, Sinead
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the most common malignancy affecting the biliary tree. The only curative treatment is surgical resection, aiming for negative margins (R0). For those who have locally advanced disease, which is borderline resectable, neoadjuvant chemoradiation presents an opportunity to reduce tumour size and allow for surgical resection. The aim of this review is to establish the role of neoadjuvant therapy in each subtype of CCA and establish its impact on survival. METHODS: Search terms such as ‘neoadjuvant therapy’ and ‘cholangiocarcinoma’ were searched on multiple databases, including Pubmed, Ovid and Embase. They were then reviewed separately by two reviewers for inclusion criteria. 978 studies were initially identified from the search strategy, with 21 being included in this review. RESULTS: 5,009 patients were included across 21 studies. 1,173 underwent neoadjuvant therapy, 3,818 had surgical resection alone. 359 patients received Gemcitabine based regimes, making it the most commonly utilised regimen for patients CCA and Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC). Data on tolerability of regimes was limited. All included papers were found to have low risk of bias when assessed using The Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a similar median overall survival compared to those who underwent upfront surgery (38.4 versus 35.1 months respectively). Pre-operative CA19-9, microvascular invasion, perineurial invasion and positive lymph nodes were of prognostic significance across BTC and CCA subtypes. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection is associated with improved patient outcomes and longer median overall survival compared to therapy and upfront surgery, however heterogeneity between research papers limited the ability to further analyse the significance of these results. Although initial studies are promising, further research is required in order to define suitable treatment protocols and tolerability of neoadjuvant regimes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020164781.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9779982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97799822022-12-23 The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review Cremen, Sinead Kelly, Michael E. Gallagher, Tom K. Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the most common malignancy affecting the biliary tree. The only curative treatment is surgical resection, aiming for negative margins (R0). For those who have locally advanced disease, which is borderline resectable, neoadjuvant chemoradiation presents an opportunity to reduce tumour size and allow for surgical resection. The aim of this review is to establish the role of neoadjuvant therapy in each subtype of CCA and establish its impact on survival. METHODS: Search terms such as ‘neoadjuvant therapy’ and ‘cholangiocarcinoma’ were searched on multiple databases, including Pubmed, Ovid and Embase. They were then reviewed separately by two reviewers for inclusion criteria. 978 studies were initially identified from the search strategy, with 21 being included in this review. RESULTS: 5,009 patients were included across 21 studies. 1,173 underwent neoadjuvant therapy, 3,818 had surgical resection alone. 359 patients received Gemcitabine based regimes, making it the most commonly utilised regimen for patients CCA and Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC). Data on tolerability of regimes was limited. All included papers were found to have low risk of bias when assessed using The Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a similar median overall survival compared to those who underwent upfront surgery (38.4 versus 35.1 months respectively). Pre-operative CA19-9, microvascular invasion, perineurial invasion and positive lymph nodes were of prognostic significance across BTC and CCA subtypes. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection is associated with improved patient outcomes and longer median overall survival compared to therapy and upfront surgery, however heterogeneity between research papers limited the ability to further analyse the significance of these results. Although initial studies are promising, further research is required in order to define suitable treatment protocols and tolerability of neoadjuvant regimes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020164781. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9779982/ /pubmed/36568243 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975136 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cremen, Kelly and Gallagher https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Cremen, Sinead
Kelly, Michael E.
Gallagher, Tom K.
The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review
title The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review
title_full The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review
title_fullStr The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review
title_short The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review
title_sort role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568243
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975136
work_keys_str_mv AT cremensinead theroleofneoadjuvanttherapyincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview
AT kellymichaele theroleofneoadjuvanttherapyincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview
AT gallaghertomk theroleofneoadjuvanttherapyincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview
AT cremensinead roleofneoadjuvanttherapyincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview
AT kellymichaele roleofneoadjuvanttherapyincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview
AT gallaghertomk roleofneoadjuvanttherapyincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview