Cargando…
The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the most common malignancy affecting the biliary tree. The only curative treatment is surgical resection, aiming for negative margins (R0). For those who have locally advanced disease, which is borderline resectable, neoadjuvant chemoradiation presents an op...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568243 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975136 |
_version_ | 1784856743606484992 |
---|---|
author | Cremen, Sinead Kelly, Michael E. Gallagher, Tom K. |
author_facet | Cremen, Sinead Kelly, Michael E. Gallagher, Tom K. |
author_sort | Cremen, Sinead |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the most common malignancy affecting the biliary tree. The only curative treatment is surgical resection, aiming for negative margins (R0). For those who have locally advanced disease, which is borderline resectable, neoadjuvant chemoradiation presents an opportunity to reduce tumour size and allow for surgical resection. The aim of this review is to establish the role of neoadjuvant therapy in each subtype of CCA and establish its impact on survival. METHODS: Search terms such as ‘neoadjuvant therapy’ and ‘cholangiocarcinoma’ were searched on multiple databases, including Pubmed, Ovid and Embase. They were then reviewed separately by two reviewers for inclusion criteria. 978 studies were initially identified from the search strategy, with 21 being included in this review. RESULTS: 5,009 patients were included across 21 studies. 1,173 underwent neoadjuvant therapy, 3,818 had surgical resection alone. 359 patients received Gemcitabine based regimes, making it the most commonly utilised regimen for patients CCA and Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC). Data on tolerability of regimes was limited. All included papers were found to have low risk of bias when assessed using The Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a similar median overall survival compared to those who underwent upfront surgery (38.4 versus 35.1 months respectively). Pre-operative CA19-9, microvascular invasion, perineurial invasion and positive lymph nodes were of prognostic significance across BTC and CCA subtypes. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection is associated with improved patient outcomes and longer median overall survival compared to therapy and upfront surgery, however heterogeneity between research papers limited the ability to further analyse the significance of these results. Although initial studies are promising, further research is required in order to define suitable treatment protocols and tolerability of neoadjuvant regimes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020164781. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9779982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97799822022-12-23 The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review Cremen, Sinead Kelly, Michael E. Gallagher, Tom K. Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the most common malignancy affecting the biliary tree. The only curative treatment is surgical resection, aiming for negative margins (R0). For those who have locally advanced disease, which is borderline resectable, neoadjuvant chemoradiation presents an opportunity to reduce tumour size and allow for surgical resection. The aim of this review is to establish the role of neoadjuvant therapy in each subtype of CCA and establish its impact on survival. METHODS: Search terms such as ‘neoadjuvant therapy’ and ‘cholangiocarcinoma’ were searched on multiple databases, including Pubmed, Ovid and Embase. They were then reviewed separately by two reviewers for inclusion criteria. 978 studies were initially identified from the search strategy, with 21 being included in this review. RESULTS: 5,009 patients were included across 21 studies. 1,173 underwent neoadjuvant therapy, 3,818 had surgical resection alone. 359 patients received Gemcitabine based regimes, making it the most commonly utilised regimen for patients CCA and Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC). Data on tolerability of regimes was limited. All included papers were found to have low risk of bias when assessed using The Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a similar median overall survival compared to those who underwent upfront surgery (38.4 versus 35.1 months respectively). Pre-operative CA19-9, microvascular invasion, perineurial invasion and positive lymph nodes were of prognostic significance across BTC and CCA subtypes. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection is associated with improved patient outcomes and longer median overall survival compared to therapy and upfront surgery, however heterogeneity between research papers limited the ability to further analyse the significance of these results. Although initial studies are promising, further research is required in order to define suitable treatment protocols and tolerability of neoadjuvant regimes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020164781. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9779982/ /pubmed/36568243 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975136 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cremen, Kelly and Gallagher https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Cremen, Sinead Kelly, Michael E. Gallagher, Tom K. The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review |
title | The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review |
title_full | The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review |
title_short | The role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review |
title_sort | role of neo-adjuvant therapy in cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9779982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568243 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cremensinead theroleofneoadjuvanttherapyincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview AT kellymichaele theroleofneoadjuvanttherapyincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview AT gallaghertomk theroleofneoadjuvanttherapyincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview AT cremensinead roleofneoadjuvanttherapyincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview AT kellymichaele roleofneoadjuvanttherapyincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview AT gallaghertomk roleofneoadjuvanttherapyincholangiocarcinomaasystematicreview |