Cargando…
Semi-automated contact tracing and management of contact precautions during the COVID-19 pandemic within a tertiary hospital
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of a spreadsheet-based COVID-19 contact-tracing tool (CTT) and determination of risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission among hospital staff members. DESIGN: Observational descriptive study on the application and acceptance of the CTT. Retrospective case-control study for SAR...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9780020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36575771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2022.100266 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Evaluation of a spreadsheet-based COVID-19 contact-tracing tool (CTT) and determination of risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission among hospital staff members. DESIGN: Observational descriptive study on the application and acceptance of the CTT. Retrospective case-control study for SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk factor determination and for evaluation of the CTT's risk stratification algorithm. Setting: Tertiary hospital in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 3514 contacts of hospital staff members to 322 SARS-CoV-2-positive cases. METHODS: A case-control study was performed to identify risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission and for unprotected contacts among staff members. To evaluate strengths and weaknesses of the CTT performance statistics were analyzed and users completed a questionnaire measuring satisfaction and acceptance of the tool. RESULTS: In 2021, the CTT was used for the algorithm-based semi-automated management of 3514 in-hospital contacts. The tool determined the risk category of individual contacts and generated messages for the information of the local public health department, the in-hospital SARS-CoV-2 test center and all staff members who had contact to the index case. Staff members without regular contacts to patients had significantly (P<0.005) more unprotected contacts to other staff members (25.5% vs. 9.6%) and more SARS-CoV-2 transmissions per contact (4.9% vs. 0.6%) than staff members with frequent contacts to patients. The profession “nurse or medical technical service” was associated with significantly (P<0.005) more unprotected contacts between staff members (11.0% vs. 2.6%) compared to the profession “physician”. CONCLUSIONS: Digital tools can increase the efficiency of in-hospital contact tracing. The CTT enable a timely systematic analysis of risk factors among staff members. |
---|