Cargando…

Causal association between adiponectin and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: A Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND: Numerous observational studies have revealed that circulating adiponectin (ADPN) is associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. However, the causality remains unknown. We aimed to assess the causality of circulating ADPN on AD risk using Mendelian randomization (MR). METHODS: Fou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Tianyu, Huang, Wei, Cao, Fangzheng, Yu, Xinyue, Ying, Zhenhua, Guo, Shunyuan, Cheng, Yifan, Xu, Chao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9780387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36570466
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1038975
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Numerous observational studies have revealed that circulating adiponectin (ADPN) is associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. However, the causality remains unknown. We aimed to assess the causality of circulating ADPN on AD risk using Mendelian randomization (MR). METHODS: Fourteen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with ADPN were selected from publicly available genetic abstract data. We applied these SNPs to two recent large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of AD, one from the FinnGen consortium and the other from a large meta-analysis. The inverse variance weighted method, MR–Egger method, the weighted median method, the Cochran Q statistic, the MR-Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier methods, and the leave-one-out analysis were applied for MR analyses. RESULTS: In MR analysis, no significant genetic association was found between plasma ADPN levels and AD risk by analyzing the FinnGen consortium GWAS database in the inverse variance weighted method [odds ratio (OR): 0.874, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.701–1.089, p = 0.230], MR–Egger (OR: 0.944, 95% CI: 0.692–1.288, p = 0.721), and weighted median method (OR: 0.900, 95% CI: 0.678–1.194, p = 0.449). Additionally, the same analysis was conducted for the meta-analysis database, and we found no significant association (OR: 1.000, 95% CI: 0.999–1.001, p = 0.683). CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal no significant causal association between circulating ADPN and AD risk.