Cargando…

Does the type of pushing at delivery influence pelvic floor function at 2 months postpartum? A pragmatic randomized trial—The EOLE study

INTRODUCTION: Maternal pushing techniques during the second stage of labor may affect women's pelvic floor function. Our main objective was to assess the impact of the type of pushing used at delivery on the mother's medium‐term pelvic floor function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a second...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barasinski, Chloé, Debost‐Legrand, Anne, Savary, Denis, Bouchet, Pamela, Curinier, Sandra, Vendittelli, Françoise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9780713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14461
_version_ 1784856898595454976
author Barasinski, Chloé
Debost‐Legrand, Anne
Savary, Denis
Bouchet, Pamela
Curinier, Sandra
Vendittelli, Françoise
author_facet Barasinski, Chloé
Debost‐Legrand, Anne
Savary, Denis
Bouchet, Pamela
Curinier, Sandra
Vendittelli, Françoise
author_sort Barasinski, Chloé
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Maternal pushing techniques during the second stage of labor may affect women's pelvic floor function. Our main objective was to assess the impact of the type of pushing used at delivery on the mother's medium‐term pelvic floor function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02474745) that took place in four French hospitals from 2015 through 2017 (n = 250). Women in labor with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation at term who had undergone standardized training in both of these types of pushing were randomized after cervical dilation ≥7 cm. The exclusion criteria were a previous cesarean, a cesarean delivery in this pregnancy or a fetal heart rate anomaly. In the intervention group, open‐glottis (OG) pushing was defined as a prolonged exhalation contracting the abdominal muscles to help move the fetus down the birth canal. Closed‐glottis (CG) pushing was defined as Valsalva pushing. The principal outcome was the stage of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) assessed by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse‐Quantification 2 months after delivery. A secondary outcome was incidence of urinary incontinence (UI). The results of our multivariable, modified intention‐to‐treat analysis are reported as crude relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Our analysis included 207 women. Mode of birth was similar in both groups. The two groups did not differ for stage II POP: 10 of 104 (9.4%) in the OG group compared with 7 of 98 (7.1%) in the CG group, for a RR 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–3.33, and an adjusted RR of 1.22, 95% CI 0.42–3.6. Similarly, the incidence of UI did not differ: 26.7% in the OG group and 28.6% in the CG group (aRR 0.81, 95% CI 0.42–1.53). Subgroup analysis suggests that for secundiparous and multiparous women, OG pushing could have a protective effect on the occurrence of UI (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13–0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The type of directed pushing used at delivery did not impact the occurrence of pelvic organ prolapse 2 months after delivery. OG pushing may have a protective effect against UI among secundiparous and multiparous women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9780713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97807132022-12-27 Does the type of pushing at delivery influence pelvic floor function at 2 months postpartum? A pragmatic randomized trial—The EOLE study Barasinski, Chloé Debost‐Legrand, Anne Savary, Denis Bouchet, Pamela Curinier, Sandra Vendittelli, Françoise Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Birth INTRODUCTION: Maternal pushing techniques during the second stage of labor may affect women's pelvic floor function. Our main objective was to assess the impact of the type of pushing used at delivery on the mother's medium‐term pelvic floor function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02474745) that took place in four French hospitals from 2015 through 2017 (n = 250). Women in labor with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation at term who had undergone standardized training in both of these types of pushing were randomized after cervical dilation ≥7 cm. The exclusion criteria were a previous cesarean, a cesarean delivery in this pregnancy or a fetal heart rate anomaly. In the intervention group, open‐glottis (OG) pushing was defined as a prolonged exhalation contracting the abdominal muscles to help move the fetus down the birth canal. Closed‐glottis (CG) pushing was defined as Valsalva pushing. The principal outcome was the stage of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) assessed by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse‐Quantification 2 months after delivery. A secondary outcome was incidence of urinary incontinence (UI). The results of our multivariable, modified intention‐to‐treat analysis are reported as crude relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Our analysis included 207 women. Mode of birth was similar in both groups. The two groups did not differ for stage II POP: 10 of 104 (9.4%) in the OG group compared with 7 of 98 (7.1%) in the CG group, for a RR 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–3.33, and an adjusted RR of 1.22, 95% CI 0.42–3.6. Similarly, the incidence of UI did not differ: 26.7% in the OG group and 28.6% in the CG group (aRR 0.81, 95% CI 0.42–1.53). Subgroup analysis suggests that for secundiparous and multiparous women, OG pushing could have a protective effect on the occurrence of UI (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13–0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The type of directed pushing used at delivery did not impact the occurrence of pelvic organ prolapse 2 months after delivery. OG pushing may have a protective effect against UI among secundiparous and multiparous women. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9780713/ /pubmed/36352788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14461 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Birth
Barasinski, Chloé
Debost‐Legrand, Anne
Savary, Denis
Bouchet, Pamela
Curinier, Sandra
Vendittelli, Françoise
Does the type of pushing at delivery influence pelvic floor function at 2 months postpartum? A pragmatic randomized trial—The EOLE study
title Does the type of pushing at delivery influence pelvic floor function at 2 months postpartum? A pragmatic randomized trial—The EOLE study
title_full Does the type of pushing at delivery influence pelvic floor function at 2 months postpartum? A pragmatic randomized trial—The EOLE study
title_fullStr Does the type of pushing at delivery influence pelvic floor function at 2 months postpartum? A pragmatic randomized trial—The EOLE study
title_full_unstemmed Does the type of pushing at delivery influence pelvic floor function at 2 months postpartum? A pragmatic randomized trial—The EOLE study
title_short Does the type of pushing at delivery influence pelvic floor function at 2 months postpartum? A pragmatic randomized trial—The EOLE study
title_sort does the type of pushing at delivery influence pelvic floor function at 2 months postpartum? a pragmatic randomized trial—the eole study
topic Birth
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9780713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14461
work_keys_str_mv AT barasinskichloe doesthetypeofpushingatdeliveryinfluencepelvicfloorfunctionat2monthspostpartumapragmaticrandomizedtrialtheeolestudy
AT debostlegrandanne doesthetypeofpushingatdeliveryinfluencepelvicfloorfunctionat2monthspostpartumapragmaticrandomizedtrialtheeolestudy
AT savarydenis doesthetypeofpushingatdeliveryinfluencepelvicfloorfunctionat2monthspostpartumapragmaticrandomizedtrialtheeolestudy
AT bouchetpamela doesthetypeofpushingatdeliveryinfluencepelvicfloorfunctionat2monthspostpartumapragmaticrandomizedtrialtheeolestudy
AT curiniersandra doesthetypeofpushingatdeliveryinfluencepelvicfloorfunctionat2monthspostpartumapragmaticrandomizedtrialtheeolestudy
AT vendittellifrancoise doesthetypeofpushingatdeliveryinfluencepelvicfloorfunctionat2monthspostpartumapragmaticrandomizedtrialtheeolestudy