Cargando…

Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study

Ce(3+), Pr(3+) co-doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) (Ce, Pr:LuAG) single crystals and ceramics were prepared using the optical floating zone (OFZ) and reactive vacuum sintering methods, respectively. The microstructure, photo- (λ(ex) = 450 nm), and radio-luminescence (under X-ray excitation) performance, as wel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Yifei, Shi, Yun, Wang, Haibo, Zhang, Qian, Wu, Tong, Yuan, Qiang, Ma, Kaicheng, Li, Tongtong, Zhou, Zhenzhen, Fang, Jinghong, He, Huan, Ni, Jinqi, Liu, Qian, Yu, Jiangding, Cui, Sheng, Shichalin, Oleg, Papynov, Eugeniy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9780938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556830
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15249025
_version_ 1784856951254941696
author Xiong, Yifei
Shi, Yun
Wang, Haibo
Zhang, Qian
Wu, Tong
Yuan, Qiang
Ma, Kaicheng
Li, Tongtong
Zhou, Zhenzhen
Fang, Jinghong
He, Huan
Ni, Jinqi
Liu, Qian
Yu, Jiangding
Cui, Sheng
Shichalin, Oleg
Papynov, Eugeniy
author_facet Xiong, Yifei
Shi, Yun
Wang, Haibo
Zhang, Qian
Wu, Tong
Yuan, Qiang
Ma, Kaicheng
Li, Tongtong
Zhou, Zhenzhen
Fang, Jinghong
He, Huan
Ni, Jinqi
Liu, Qian
Yu, Jiangding
Cui, Sheng
Shichalin, Oleg
Papynov, Eugeniy
author_sort Xiong, Yifei
collection PubMed
description Ce(3+), Pr(3+) co-doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) (Ce, Pr:LuAG) single crystals and ceramics were prepared using the optical floating zone (OFZ) and reactive vacuum sintering methods, respectively. The microstructure, photo- (λ(ex) = 450 nm), and radio-luminescence (under X-ray excitation) performance, as well as scintillation light yield (LY, under γ-ray, (137)Cs source) of both materials, were investigated and compared. Ce, Pr:LuAG ceramics had an in-line transmittance of approximately 20% in the visible light range, while the analogous crystals were more transparent (~65%). The X-ray excited luminescent (XEL) spectra showed the characteristic Ce (3+) and Pr(3+) emissions located at 310 nm, 380 nm, and 510 nm. The highest LY of the Ce, Pr:LuAG ceramics reached 34,112 pho/MeV at 2 μs time gate, which is higher than that of a single crystal. The ratio of LY values (LY2/LY0.75) between shaping times of 0.75 μs and 2 μs indicated a faster scintillation decay of ceramics regarding single crystals. It was ascribed to the lower effective concentration of luminescent activators in single crystals because of the coefficient segregation effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9780938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97809382022-12-24 Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study Xiong, Yifei Shi, Yun Wang, Haibo Zhang, Qian Wu, Tong Yuan, Qiang Ma, Kaicheng Li, Tongtong Zhou, Zhenzhen Fang, Jinghong He, Huan Ni, Jinqi Liu, Qian Yu, Jiangding Cui, Sheng Shichalin, Oleg Papynov, Eugeniy Materials (Basel) Article Ce(3+), Pr(3+) co-doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) (Ce, Pr:LuAG) single crystals and ceramics were prepared using the optical floating zone (OFZ) and reactive vacuum sintering methods, respectively. The microstructure, photo- (λ(ex) = 450 nm), and radio-luminescence (under X-ray excitation) performance, as well as scintillation light yield (LY, under γ-ray, (137)Cs source) of both materials, were investigated and compared. Ce, Pr:LuAG ceramics had an in-line transmittance of approximately 20% in the visible light range, while the analogous crystals were more transparent (~65%). The X-ray excited luminescent (XEL) spectra showed the characteristic Ce (3+) and Pr(3+) emissions located at 310 nm, 380 nm, and 510 nm. The highest LY of the Ce, Pr:LuAG ceramics reached 34,112 pho/MeV at 2 μs time gate, which is higher than that of a single crystal. The ratio of LY values (LY2/LY0.75) between shaping times of 0.75 μs and 2 μs indicated a faster scintillation decay of ceramics regarding single crystals. It was ascribed to the lower effective concentration of luminescent activators in single crystals because of the coefficient segregation effect. MDPI 2022-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9780938/ /pubmed/36556830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15249025 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Xiong, Yifei
Shi, Yun
Wang, Haibo
Zhang, Qian
Wu, Tong
Yuan, Qiang
Ma, Kaicheng
Li, Tongtong
Zhou, Zhenzhen
Fang, Jinghong
He, Huan
Ni, Jinqi
Liu, Qian
Yu, Jiangding
Cui, Sheng
Shichalin, Oleg
Papynov, Eugeniy
Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study
title Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study
title_full Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study
title_short Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study
title_sort ce(3+), pr(3+) co-doped lu(3)al(5)o(12) single crystals and ceramics: a comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9780938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556830
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15249025
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongyifei ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT shiyun ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT wanghaibo ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT zhangqian ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT wutong ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT yuanqiang ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT makaicheng ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT litongtong ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT zhouzhenzhen ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT fangjinghong ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT hehuan ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT nijinqi ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT liuqian ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT yujiangding ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT cuisheng ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT shichalinoleg ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy
AT papynoveugeniy ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy