Cargando…
Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study
Ce(3+), Pr(3+) co-doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) (Ce, Pr:LuAG) single crystals and ceramics were prepared using the optical floating zone (OFZ) and reactive vacuum sintering methods, respectively. The microstructure, photo- (λ(ex) = 450 nm), and radio-luminescence (under X-ray excitation) performance, as wel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9780938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15249025 |
_version_ | 1784856951254941696 |
---|---|
author | Xiong, Yifei Shi, Yun Wang, Haibo Zhang, Qian Wu, Tong Yuan, Qiang Ma, Kaicheng Li, Tongtong Zhou, Zhenzhen Fang, Jinghong He, Huan Ni, Jinqi Liu, Qian Yu, Jiangding Cui, Sheng Shichalin, Oleg Papynov, Eugeniy |
author_facet | Xiong, Yifei Shi, Yun Wang, Haibo Zhang, Qian Wu, Tong Yuan, Qiang Ma, Kaicheng Li, Tongtong Zhou, Zhenzhen Fang, Jinghong He, Huan Ni, Jinqi Liu, Qian Yu, Jiangding Cui, Sheng Shichalin, Oleg Papynov, Eugeniy |
author_sort | Xiong, Yifei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ce(3+), Pr(3+) co-doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) (Ce, Pr:LuAG) single crystals and ceramics were prepared using the optical floating zone (OFZ) and reactive vacuum sintering methods, respectively. The microstructure, photo- (λ(ex) = 450 nm), and radio-luminescence (under X-ray excitation) performance, as well as scintillation light yield (LY, under γ-ray, (137)Cs source) of both materials, were investigated and compared. Ce, Pr:LuAG ceramics had an in-line transmittance of approximately 20% in the visible light range, while the analogous crystals were more transparent (~65%). The X-ray excited luminescent (XEL) spectra showed the characteristic Ce (3+) and Pr(3+) emissions located at 310 nm, 380 nm, and 510 nm. The highest LY of the Ce, Pr:LuAG ceramics reached 34,112 pho/MeV at 2 μs time gate, which is higher than that of a single crystal. The ratio of LY values (LY2/LY0.75) between shaping times of 0.75 μs and 2 μs indicated a faster scintillation decay of ceramics regarding single crystals. It was ascribed to the lower effective concentration of luminescent activators in single crystals because of the coefficient segregation effect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9780938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97809382022-12-24 Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study Xiong, Yifei Shi, Yun Wang, Haibo Zhang, Qian Wu, Tong Yuan, Qiang Ma, Kaicheng Li, Tongtong Zhou, Zhenzhen Fang, Jinghong He, Huan Ni, Jinqi Liu, Qian Yu, Jiangding Cui, Sheng Shichalin, Oleg Papynov, Eugeniy Materials (Basel) Article Ce(3+), Pr(3+) co-doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) (Ce, Pr:LuAG) single crystals and ceramics were prepared using the optical floating zone (OFZ) and reactive vacuum sintering methods, respectively. The microstructure, photo- (λ(ex) = 450 nm), and radio-luminescence (under X-ray excitation) performance, as well as scintillation light yield (LY, under γ-ray, (137)Cs source) of both materials, were investigated and compared. Ce, Pr:LuAG ceramics had an in-line transmittance of approximately 20% in the visible light range, while the analogous crystals were more transparent (~65%). The X-ray excited luminescent (XEL) spectra showed the characteristic Ce (3+) and Pr(3+) emissions located at 310 nm, 380 nm, and 510 nm. The highest LY of the Ce, Pr:LuAG ceramics reached 34,112 pho/MeV at 2 μs time gate, which is higher than that of a single crystal. The ratio of LY values (LY2/LY0.75) between shaping times of 0.75 μs and 2 μs indicated a faster scintillation decay of ceramics regarding single crystals. It was ascribed to the lower effective concentration of luminescent activators in single crystals because of the coefficient segregation effect. MDPI 2022-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9780938/ /pubmed/36556830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15249025 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Xiong, Yifei Shi, Yun Wang, Haibo Zhang, Qian Wu, Tong Yuan, Qiang Ma, Kaicheng Li, Tongtong Zhou, Zhenzhen Fang, Jinghong He, Huan Ni, Jinqi Liu, Qian Yu, Jiangding Cui, Sheng Shichalin, Oleg Papynov, Eugeniy Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study |
title | Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Ce(3+), Pr(3+) Co-Doped Lu(3)Al(5)O(12) Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | ce(3+), pr(3+) co-doped lu(3)al(5)o(12) single crystals and ceramics: a comparative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9780938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15249025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiongyifei ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT shiyun ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT wanghaibo ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT zhangqian ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT wutong ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT yuanqiang ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT makaicheng ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT litongtong ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT zhouzhenzhen ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT fangjinghong ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT hehuan ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT nijinqi ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT liuqian ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT yujiangding ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT cuisheng ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT shichalinoleg ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy AT papynoveugeniy ce3pr3codopedlu3al5o12singlecrystalsandceramicsacomparativestudy |