Cargando…

Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

There is increasing interest in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a reliable treatment for arthritic, rotator cuff deficient shoulders. Humeral and glenoid version are controversial parameters that can influence internal and external rotation, muscular forces, and implant stability as ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berton, Alessandra, Longo, Umile Giuseppe, Gulotta, Lawrence V., De Salvatore, Sergio, Piergentili, Ilaria, Calabrese, Giovanni, Roberti, Federica, Warren, Russell F., Denaro, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9781424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247416
_version_ 1784857070860763136
author Berton, Alessandra
Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Gulotta, Lawrence V.
De Salvatore, Sergio
Piergentili, Ilaria
Calabrese, Giovanni
Roberti, Federica
Warren, Russell F.
Denaro, Vincenzo
author_facet Berton, Alessandra
Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Gulotta, Lawrence V.
De Salvatore, Sergio
Piergentili, Ilaria
Calabrese, Giovanni
Roberti, Federica
Warren, Russell F.
Denaro, Vincenzo
author_sort Berton, Alessandra
collection PubMed
description There is increasing interest in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a reliable treatment for arthritic, rotator cuff deficient shoulders. Humeral and glenoid version are controversial parameters that can influence internal and external rotation, muscular forces, and implant stability as outcomes of RTSA. The aim of this study was to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on the effect of both humeral component version and glenoid component version and give recommendations on their most optimal degree for RTSA. A comprehensive quantitative review of the published literature on the effect of humeral version and glenoid version in RTSA was performed, to identify its influence on the range of movement, muscle forces, and intrinsic stability of the reverse prosthesis. Eleven studies were included: nine were biomechanical studies, one was a clinical-radiographic study, and one was an implant design consideration. Anterior stability can be improved by implanting the humeral component in neutral or with some anteversion. Glenoid component retroversion has been proven to reduce the likelihood of subluxation, while increasing ER and ROM at the same time. The study was conducted considering 5° anteversion; neutral; and 5°, 10°, and 20° retroversion of the glenoid component. Although a final opinion has not been yet expressed on the matter, the general consensus tends to agree on restoring 0° to 20° of retroversion of the humeral and glenoid component to yield the best outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9781424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97814242022-12-24 Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Berton, Alessandra Longo, Umile Giuseppe Gulotta, Lawrence V. De Salvatore, Sergio Piergentili, Ilaria Calabrese, Giovanni Roberti, Federica Warren, Russell F. Denaro, Vincenzo J Clin Med Article There is increasing interest in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a reliable treatment for arthritic, rotator cuff deficient shoulders. Humeral and glenoid version are controversial parameters that can influence internal and external rotation, muscular forces, and implant stability as outcomes of RTSA. The aim of this study was to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on the effect of both humeral component version and glenoid component version and give recommendations on their most optimal degree for RTSA. A comprehensive quantitative review of the published literature on the effect of humeral version and glenoid version in RTSA was performed, to identify its influence on the range of movement, muscle forces, and intrinsic stability of the reverse prosthesis. Eleven studies were included: nine were biomechanical studies, one was a clinical-radiographic study, and one was an implant design consideration. Anterior stability can be improved by implanting the humeral component in neutral or with some anteversion. Glenoid component retroversion has been proven to reduce the likelihood of subluxation, while increasing ER and ROM at the same time. The study was conducted considering 5° anteversion; neutral; and 5°, 10°, and 20° retroversion of the glenoid component. Although a final opinion has not been yet expressed on the matter, the general consensus tends to agree on restoring 0° to 20° of retroversion of the humeral and glenoid component to yield the best outcomes. MDPI 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9781424/ /pubmed/36556031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247416 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Berton, Alessandra
Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Gulotta, Lawrence V.
De Salvatore, Sergio
Piergentili, Ilaria
Calabrese, Giovanni
Roberti, Federica
Warren, Russell F.
Denaro, Vincenzo
Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_full Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_short Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
title_sort humeral and glenoid version in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9781424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247416
work_keys_str_mv AT bertonalessandra humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview
AT longoumilegiuseppe humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview
AT gulottalawrencev humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview
AT desalvatoresergio humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview
AT piergentiliilaria humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview
AT calabresegiovanni humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview
AT robertifederica humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview
AT warrenrussellf humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview
AT denarovincenzo humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview