Cargando…
Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
There is increasing interest in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a reliable treatment for arthritic, rotator cuff deficient shoulders. Humeral and glenoid version are controversial parameters that can influence internal and external rotation, muscular forces, and implant stability as ou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9781424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247416 |
_version_ | 1784857070860763136 |
---|---|
author | Berton, Alessandra Longo, Umile Giuseppe Gulotta, Lawrence V. De Salvatore, Sergio Piergentili, Ilaria Calabrese, Giovanni Roberti, Federica Warren, Russell F. Denaro, Vincenzo |
author_facet | Berton, Alessandra Longo, Umile Giuseppe Gulotta, Lawrence V. De Salvatore, Sergio Piergentili, Ilaria Calabrese, Giovanni Roberti, Federica Warren, Russell F. Denaro, Vincenzo |
author_sort | Berton, Alessandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is increasing interest in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a reliable treatment for arthritic, rotator cuff deficient shoulders. Humeral and glenoid version are controversial parameters that can influence internal and external rotation, muscular forces, and implant stability as outcomes of RTSA. The aim of this study was to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on the effect of both humeral component version and glenoid component version and give recommendations on their most optimal degree for RTSA. A comprehensive quantitative review of the published literature on the effect of humeral version and glenoid version in RTSA was performed, to identify its influence on the range of movement, muscle forces, and intrinsic stability of the reverse prosthesis. Eleven studies were included: nine were biomechanical studies, one was a clinical-radiographic study, and one was an implant design consideration. Anterior stability can be improved by implanting the humeral component in neutral or with some anteversion. Glenoid component retroversion has been proven to reduce the likelihood of subluxation, while increasing ER and ROM at the same time. The study was conducted considering 5° anteversion; neutral; and 5°, 10°, and 20° retroversion of the glenoid component. Although a final opinion has not been yet expressed on the matter, the general consensus tends to agree on restoring 0° to 20° of retroversion of the humeral and glenoid component to yield the best outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9781424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97814242022-12-24 Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Berton, Alessandra Longo, Umile Giuseppe Gulotta, Lawrence V. De Salvatore, Sergio Piergentili, Ilaria Calabrese, Giovanni Roberti, Federica Warren, Russell F. Denaro, Vincenzo J Clin Med Article There is increasing interest in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a reliable treatment for arthritic, rotator cuff deficient shoulders. Humeral and glenoid version are controversial parameters that can influence internal and external rotation, muscular forces, and implant stability as outcomes of RTSA. The aim of this study was to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on the effect of both humeral component version and glenoid component version and give recommendations on their most optimal degree for RTSA. A comprehensive quantitative review of the published literature on the effect of humeral version and glenoid version in RTSA was performed, to identify its influence on the range of movement, muscle forces, and intrinsic stability of the reverse prosthesis. Eleven studies were included: nine were biomechanical studies, one was a clinical-radiographic study, and one was an implant design consideration. Anterior stability can be improved by implanting the humeral component in neutral or with some anteversion. Glenoid component retroversion has been proven to reduce the likelihood of subluxation, while increasing ER and ROM at the same time. The study was conducted considering 5° anteversion; neutral; and 5°, 10°, and 20° retroversion of the glenoid component. Although a final opinion has not been yet expressed on the matter, the general consensus tends to agree on restoring 0° to 20° of retroversion of the humeral and glenoid component to yield the best outcomes. MDPI 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9781424/ /pubmed/36556031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247416 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Berton, Alessandra Longo, Umile Giuseppe Gulotta, Lawrence V. De Salvatore, Sergio Piergentili, Ilaria Calabrese, Giovanni Roberti, Federica Warren, Russell F. Denaro, Vincenzo Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review |
title | Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | humeral and glenoid version in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9781424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247416 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bertonalessandra humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview AT longoumilegiuseppe humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview AT gulottalawrencev humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview AT desalvatoresergio humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview AT piergentiliilaria humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview AT calabresegiovanni humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview AT robertifederica humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview AT warrenrussellf humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview AT denarovincenzo humeralandglenoidversioninreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyasystematicreview |