Cargando…

Analysis of Signal Processing Methods to Reject the DC Offset Contribution of Static Reflectors in FMCW Radar-Based Vital Signs Monitoring

Frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radars are currently being investigated for remote vital signs monitoring (measure of respiration and heart rates) as an innovative wireless solution for healthcare and ambient assisted living. However, static reflectors (furniture, objects, stationary body...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mercuri, Marco, Torfs, Tom, Rykunov, Maxim, Laureti, Stefano, Ricci, Marco, Crupi, Felice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9781610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36560066
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22249697
_version_ 1784857116396224512
author Mercuri, Marco
Torfs, Tom
Rykunov, Maxim
Laureti, Stefano
Ricci, Marco
Crupi, Felice
author_facet Mercuri, Marco
Torfs, Tom
Rykunov, Maxim
Laureti, Stefano
Ricci, Marco
Crupi, Felice
author_sort Mercuri, Marco
collection PubMed
description Frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radars are currently being investigated for remote vital signs monitoring (measure of respiration and heart rates) as an innovative wireless solution for healthcare and ambient assisted living. However, static reflectors (furniture, objects, stationary body parts, etc.) within the range or range angular bin where the subject is present contribute in the Doppler signal to a direct current (DC) offset. The latter is added to the person’s information, containing also a useful DC component, causing signal distortion and hence reducing the accuracy in measuring the vital sign parameters. Removing the sole contribution of the unwanted DC offset is fundamental to perform proper phase demodulation, so that accurate vital signs monitoring can be achieved. In this work, we analyzed different DC offset calibration methods to determine which one achieves the highest accuracy in measuring the physiological parameters as the transmitting frequency varies. More precisely, by using two FMCW radars, operating below 10 GHz and at millimeter wave (mmWave), we applied four DC offset calibration methods to the baseband radar signals originated by the cardiopulmonary activities. We experimentally determined the accuracy of the methods by measuring the respiration and the heart rates of different subjects in an office setting. It was found that the linear demodulation outperforms the other methods if operating below 10 GHz while the geometric fitting provides the best results at mmWave.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9781610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97816102022-12-24 Analysis of Signal Processing Methods to Reject the DC Offset Contribution of Static Reflectors in FMCW Radar-Based Vital Signs Monitoring Mercuri, Marco Torfs, Tom Rykunov, Maxim Laureti, Stefano Ricci, Marco Crupi, Felice Sensors (Basel) Article Frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radars are currently being investigated for remote vital signs monitoring (measure of respiration and heart rates) as an innovative wireless solution for healthcare and ambient assisted living. However, static reflectors (furniture, objects, stationary body parts, etc.) within the range or range angular bin where the subject is present contribute in the Doppler signal to a direct current (DC) offset. The latter is added to the person’s information, containing also a useful DC component, causing signal distortion and hence reducing the accuracy in measuring the vital sign parameters. Removing the sole contribution of the unwanted DC offset is fundamental to perform proper phase demodulation, so that accurate vital signs monitoring can be achieved. In this work, we analyzed different DC offset calibration methods to determine which one achieves the highest accuracy in measuring the physiological parameters as the transmitting frequency varies. More precisely, by using two FMCW radars, operating below 10 GHz and at millimeter wave (mmWave), we applied four DC offset calibration methods to the baseband radar signals originated by the cardiopulmonary activities. We experimentally determined the accuracy of the methods by measuring the respiration and the heart rates of different subjects in an office setting. It was found that the linear demodulation outperforms the other methods if operating below 10 GHz while the geometric fitting provides the best results at mmWave. MDPI 2022-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9781610/ /pubmed/36560066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22249697 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mercuri, Marco
Torfs, Tom
Rykunov, Maxim
Laureti, Stefano
Ricci, Marco
Crupi, Felice
Analysis of Signal Processing Methods to Reject the DC Offset Contribution of Static Reflectors in FMCW Radar-Based Vital Signs Monitoring
title Analysis of Signal Processing Methods to Reject the DC Offset Contribution of Static Reflectors in FMCW Radar-Based Vital Signs Monitoring
title_full Analysis of Signal Processing Methods to Reject the DC Offset Contribution of Static Reflectors in FMCW Radar-Based Vital Signs Monitoring
title_fullStr Analysis of Signal Processing Methods to Reject the DC Offset Contribution of Static Reflectors in FMCW Radar-Based Vital Signs Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Signal Processing Methods to Reject the DC Offset Contribution of Static Reflectors in FMCW Radar-Based Vital Signs Monitoring
title_short Analysis of Signal Processing Methods to Reject the DC Offset Contribution of Static Reflectors in FMCW Radar-Based Vital Signs Monitoring
title_sort analysis of signal processing methods to reject the dc offset contribution of static reflectors in fmcw radar-based vital signs monitoring
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9781610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36560066
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22249697
work_keys_str_mv AT mercurimarco analysisofsignalprocessingmethodstorejectthedcoffsetcontributionofstaticreflectorsinfmcwradarbasedvitalsignsmonitoring
AT torfstom analysisofsignalprocessingmethodstorejectthedcoffsetcontributionofstaticreflectorsinfmcwradarbasedvitalsignsmonitoring
AT rykunovmaxim analysisofsignalprocessingmethodstorejectthedcoffsetcontributionofstaticreflectorsinfmcwradarbasedvitalsignsmonitoring
AT lauretistefano analysisofsignalprocessingmethodstorejectthedcoffsetcontributionofstaticreflectorsinfmcwradarbasedvitalsignsmonitoring
AT riccimarco analysisofsignalprocessingmethodstorejectthedcoffsetcontributionofstaticreflectorsinfmcwradarbasedvitalsignsmonitoring
AT crupifelice analysisofsignalprocessingmethodstorejectthedcoffsetcontributionofstaticreflectorsinfmcwradarbasedvitalsignsmonitoring