Cargando…

Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome

Background: This study is focused on Internal Iliac Artery (IIA) embolization in patients undergoing Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR). Our aims were: to establish the feasibility of the procedure; to assess the presence of endoleak (EL) and increase in the size of the sac at follow-up; to define...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fontana, Federico, Coppola, Andrea, Ferrario, Lucrezia, De Marchi, Giuseppe, Macchi, Edoardo, Zorzetto, Giada, Franchin, Marco, Piffaretti, Gabriele, Tozzi, Matteo, Carcano, Giulio, Piacentino, Filippo, Venturini, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9782076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247399
_version_ 1784857252519215104
author Fontana, Federico
Coppola, Andrea
Ferrario, Lucrezia
De Marchi, Giuseppe
Macchi, Edoardo
Zorzetto, Giada
Franchin, Marco
Piffaretti, Gabriele
Tozzi, Matteo
Carcano, Giulio
Piacentino, Filippo
Venturini, Massimo
author_facet Fontana, Federico
Coppola, Andrea
Ferrario, Lucrezia
De Marchi, Giuseppe
Macchi, Edoardo
Zorzetto, Giada
Franchin, Marco
Piffaretti, Gabriele
Tozzi, Matteo
Carcano, Giulio
Piacentino, Filippo
Venturini, Massimo
author_sort Fontana, Federico
collection PubMed
description Background: This study is focused on Internal Iliac Artery (IIA) embolization in patients undergoing Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR). Our aims were: to establish the feasibility of the procedure; to assess the presence of endoleak (EL) and increase in the size of the sac at follow-up; to define the need for reintervention; and to evaluate mortality rate. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, EVAR-treated patients with an embolization of IIA were chosen. Coils and vascular plug were used as embolizing agents. Results: A total of 49 participants were enrolled in the study (48 men and one woman) with a median age of 76 ± 12 years. Patients had no early EL in 87.75% of cases, 8.16% had type 1a EL, 2.04% type 1b EL, and 2.04% type 2 EL, with a comprehensive technical success of 95.91%. In the follow-up, at 1 month 72.22% remained without EL, at 6 months 70.97%, and at 1 year 81.48%. In the same period, the trend of type 1 EL was 5.56% (1 month), 3.23% (6 months), and 0% (1 year). For EL type 2: 22.22% at 1 month, 25.81% at 6 months, and 16.7% at 1 year. The overall mortality was 35.58% and the re-intervention rate was 16.33%. Conclusions: IIA embolization is a feasible and safe procedure. The presence of EL is not superior to EVAR procedures that do not involve embolization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9782076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97820762022-12-24 Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome Fontana, Federico Coppola, Andrea Ferrario, Lucrezia De Marchi, Giuseppe Macchi, Edoardo Zorzetto, Giada Franchin, Marco Piffaretti, Gabriele Tozzi, Matteo Carcano, Giulio Piacentino, Filippo Venturini, Massimo J Clin Med Article Background: This study is focused on Internal Iliac Artery (IIA) embolization in patients undergoing Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR). Our aims were: to establish the feasibility of the procedure; to assess the presence of endoleak (EL) and increase in the size of the sac at follow-up; to define the need for reintervention; and to evaluate mortality rate. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, EVAR-treated patients with an embolization of IIA were chosen. Coils and vascular plug were used as embolizing agents. Results: A total of 49 participants were enrolled in the study (48 men and one woman) with a median age of 76 ± 12 years. Patients had no early EL in 87.75% of cases, 8.16% had type 1a EL, 2.04% type 1b EL, and 2.04% type 2 EL, with a comprehensive technical success of 95.91%. In the follow-up, at 1 month 72.22% remained without EL, at 6 months 70.97%, and at 1 year 81.48%. In the same period, the trend of type 1 EL was 5.56% (1 month), 3.23% (6 months), and 0% (1 year). For EL type 2: 22.22% at 1 month, 25.81% at 6 months, and 16.7% at 1 year. The overall mortality was 35.58% and the re-intervention rate was 16.33%. Conclusions: IIA embolization is a feasible and safe procedure. The presence of EL is not superior to EVAR procedures that do not involve embolization. MDPI 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9782076/ /pubmed/36556015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247399 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fontana, Federico
Coppola, Andrea
Ferrario, Lucrezia
De Marchi, Giuseppe
Macchi, Edoardo
Zorzetto, Giada
Franchin, Marco
Piffaretti, Gabriele
Tozzi, Matteo
Carcano, Giulio
Piacentino, Filippo
Venturini, Massimo
Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome
title Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome
title_full Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome
title_fullStr Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome
title_short Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome
title_sort internal iliac artery embolization within evar procedure: safety, feasibility, and outcome
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9782076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247399
work_keys_str_mv AT fontanafederico internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome
AT coppolaandrea internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome
AT ferrariolucrezia internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome
AT demarchigiuseppe internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome
AT macchiedoardo internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome
AT zorzettogiada internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome
AT franchinmarco internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome
AT piffarettigabriele internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome
AT tozzimatteo internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome
AT carcanogiulio internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome
AT piacentinofilippo internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome
AT venturinimassimo internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome