Cargando…
Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome
Background: This study is focused on Internal Iliac Artery (IIA) embolization in patients undergoing Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR). Our aims were: to establish the feasibility of the procedure; to assess the presence of endoleak (EL) and increase in the size of the sac at follow-up; to define...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9782076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247399 |
_version_ | 1784857252519215104 |
---|---|
author | Fontana, Federico Coppola, Andrea Ferrario, Lucrezia De Marchi, Giuseppe Macchi, Edoardo Zorzetto, Giada Franchin, Marco Piffaretti, Gabriele Tozzi, Matteo Carcano, Giulio Piacentino, Filippo Venturini, Massimo |
author_facet | Fontana, Federico Coppola, Andrea Ferrario, Lucrezia De Marchi, Giuseppe Macchi, Edoardo Zorzetto, Giada Franchin, Marco Piffaretti, Gabriele Tozzi, Matteo Carcano, Giulio Piacentino, Filippo Venturini, Massimo |
author_sort | Fontana, Federico |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: This study is focused on Internal Iliac Artery (IIA) embolization in patients undergoing Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR). Our aims were: to establish the feasibility of the procedure; to assess the presence of endoleak (EL) and increase in the size of the sac at follow-up; to define the need for reintervention; and to evaluate mortality rate. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, EVAR-treated patients with an embolization of IIA were chosen. Coils and vascular plug were used as embolizing agents. Results: A total of 49 participants were enrolled in the study (48 men and one woman) with a median age of 76 ± 12 years. Patients had no early EL in 87.75% of cases, 8.16% had type 1a EL, 2.04% type 1b EL, and 2.04% type 2 EL, with a comprehensive technical success of 95.91%. In the follow-up, at 1 month 72.22% remained without EL, at 6 months 70.97%, and at 1 year 81.48%. In the same period, the trend of type 1 EL was 5.56% (1 month), 3.23% (6 months), and 0% (1 year). For EL type 2: 22.22% at 1 month, 25.81% at 6 months, and 16.7% at 1 year. The overall mortality was 35.58% and the re-intervention rate was 16.33%. Conclusions: IIA embolization is a feasible and safe procedure. The presence of EL is not superior to EVAR procedures that do not involve embolization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9782076 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97820762022-12-24 Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome Fontana, Federico Coppola, Andrea Ferrario, Lucrezia De Marchi, Giuseppe Macchi, Edoardo Zorzetto, Giada Franchin, Marco Piffaretti, Gabriele Tozzi, Matteo Carcano, Giulio Piacentino, Filippo Venturini, Massimo J Clin Med Article Background: This study is focused on Internal Iliac Artery (IIA) embolization in patients undergoing Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR). Our aims were: to establish the feasibility of the procedure; to assess the presence of endoleak (EL) and increase in the size of the sac at follow-up; to define the need for reintervention; and to evaluate mortality rate. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, EVAR-treated patients with an embolization of IIA were chosen. Coils and vascular plug were used as embolizing agents. Results: A total of 49 participants were enrolled in the study (48 men and one woman) with a median age of 76 ± 12 years. Patients had no early EL in 87.75% of cases, 8.16% had type 1a EL, 2.04% type 1b EL, and 2.04% type 2 EL, with a comprehensive technical success of 95.91%. In the follow-up, at 1 month 72.22% remained without EL, at 6 months 70.97%, and at 1 year 81.48%. In the same period, the trend of type 1 EL was 5.56% (1 month), 3.23% (6 months), and 0% (1 year). For EL type 2: 22.22% at 1 month, 25.81% at 6 months, and 16.7% at 1 year. The overall mortality was 35.58% and the re-intervention rate was 16.33%. Conclusions: IIA embolization is a feasible and safe procedure. The presence of EL is not superior to EVAR procedures that do not involve embolization. MDPI 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9782076/ /pubmed/36556015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247399 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fontana, Federico Coppola, Andrea Ferrario, Lucrezia De Marchi, Giuseppe Macchi, Edoardo Zorzetto, Giada Franchin, Marco Piffaretti, Gabriele Tozzi, Matteo Carcano, Giulio Piacentino, Filippo Venturini, Massimo Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome |
title | Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome |
title_full | Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome |
title_fullStr | Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome |
title_full_unstemmed | Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome |
title_short | Internal Iliac Artery Embolization within EVAR Procedure: Safety, Feasibility, and Outcome |
title_sort | internal iliac artery embolization within evar procedure: safety, feasibility, and outcome |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9782076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247399 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fontanafederico internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome AT coppolaandrea internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome AT ferrariolucrezia internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome AT demarchigiuseppe internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome AT macchiedoardo internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome AT zorzettogiada internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome AT franchinmarco internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome AT piffarettigabriele internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome AT tozzimatteo internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome AT carcanogiulio internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome AT piacentinofilippo internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome AT venturinimassimo internaliliacarteryembolizationwithinevarproceduresafetyfeasibilityandoutcome |